Audit: QRS - Cardio Training for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 15/09/2026 03:47 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 85
Failed 0
N/A 8
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢  
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Hedges carried through: “Accumulated short bouts appear comparable…” (line 482) mirrors ER line 436; speculative tiers retain the ER’s speculative framing.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Population and dose qualifiers that bound claims are retained (“in established coronary disease”, “at high training volumes”, “in lifelong male endurance athletes”).
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Stop/caution items come only from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section; no Benefit- or Risk-Modifying Factor is surfaced.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, author names, NCT IDs or device brands (Polar H10, Garmin HRM-Pro, Lactate Plus) carried into the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢  

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢  
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢  
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the authored content.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Retained terminology (NYHA IV, AV block, hs-CRP, ApoB) is ER-sourced and load-bearing for the decision gates and monitoring panel.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 The dose-shaped upper-end costs (atrial fibrillation, coronary plaque, low energy availability) are surfaced, which is the signal specific to high-volume trainees.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢  
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 The lede’s plain wordings (“irregular heart rhythm”, “fatty deposits in heart arteries”) are the ER Conclusion’s own phrasing, not lay substitutions introduced by the QRS.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed strings match the template byte-for-byte, including the template’s own unescaped & in “Risk & Side Effects” (line 604).
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 named template spans present; the four patterned spans (marker_#name/target/why, qualitative_item#) instantiated as marker_1–12 and qualitative_item_1–6.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Structural comparison against the template shows no added, removed or altered non-variable markup; the template’s BENEFTIS comment (line 528) and 2×2 Time-to-Effect comment (line 490) are preserved verbatim.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section mapped to the QRS is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels “Weekly structure”, “Polarised approach” and “Session length and splitting” match ER lines 424, 428 and 436 verbatim.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Monitoring marker names reproduce the ER biomarker-table rows verbatim (ER lines 517–528).
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji code points in the file; the ER’s ⚠️ Conflicted markers are correctly dropped.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every section is delivered in condensed form within the template’s fixed budget (three protocol cells, three time cells, one line per tier, trimmed targets and drug lists); no section is extended beyond the template’s structure.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Lines 2–14.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢  
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:03" is quoted, correctly, because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 Line 5: 26.9.11, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 Line 6: 2026-0915-0324.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Line 7.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus”.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Line 8.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5” — no trailing qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Line 9, matching the file on disk.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢  

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 22: “Cardio Training for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 417.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 Line 421: 09/15/2026 from 2026-0915-0324.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Line 425: “Opus 5”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 The ER’s “Also known as” line is not carried over; the header block matches the template.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Lines 434–437; tracks ER lines 561–563.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 50 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Trial-backed benefits map to ER line 561; the mortality association to line 561; the dose-shaped costs to line 563.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 “irregular heart rhythm” for atrial fibrillation, “fatty deposits in heart arteries” for coronary plaque, “thinking” for cognition; no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from “Populations who should avoid Cardio Training”, ER lines 389–400.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All 10 ER bullets represented, lines 566–575.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s trailing em-dash clause on myocarditis/pericarditis (line 392) is stripped; no dashes carry explanatory content.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 48 h, 3–6 months, NYHA IV, under 1.0 cm², 200/110 mmHg, 7 days, 250 mg/dL and 45 mm all preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 The ER uses no ranking notation; no bare symbols carried through.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The ER names such populations and the section is populated accordingly.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 ER lines 365–387.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 All 12 ER interaction bullets represented, lines 583–594; no overlap with [stop_items].
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s Caution/Monitor verdicts, mechanisms and mitigations are all stripped; drug-class glosses after the em-dash inside the ER parens are dropped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug lists retained for every class that carried one; longer lists trimmed rather than dropped (e.g., ER “apixaban, warfarin, clopidogrel” to “apixaban, warfarin”). The vitamin C above 1 g daily threshold is preserved.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 The ER uses no ranking notation; all parenthetical drug lists are plain comma-separated.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The ER names 12 such interactions and the section is populated accordingly.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 ER Therapeutic Protocol, lines 422–448.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Weekly volume/frequency, intensity distribution, and session length/splitting — the three levers the ER leads with.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER mentions far more than three actionable aspects; all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine spans populated; values trace to ER lines 424, 428 and 436.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Aerobic capacity, blood pressure/HbA1c and mood, from ER line 483.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered as cardiorespiratory fitness, then resting blood pressure/glucose control, then mood — matching the ER’s own ordering of High-tier benefits.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER states four distinct time-to-effect windows; all three sets are used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All nine spans populated; 6–8 weeks, 8–12 weeks and 1–2 weeks all match ER line 483.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information (line 483), so the section is retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 ER lines 143–251.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four present, lines 532–556.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each ER benefit reduced to its heading; the only qualifiers retained are the population bounds carried in the ER headings themselves, which cannot be dropped without overstating the claim.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses remain in any benefits span.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers carry items in the ER.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 ER lines 269–347.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four present, lines 606–628.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 All 12 ER risks reduced to headings; retained dose and population bounds are intrinsic to the ER headings.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses remain in any risks span.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers carry items in the ER.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success, lines 509–528.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 12 ER biomarker-table rows present as marker_1–marker_12, in ER order, with targets and rationales matching.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Lines 812–815; matches ER line 513.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 ER lines 530–537.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers present as qualitative_item_1–6.

Issues 15/09/2026 03:47

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 15/09/2026 03:36

  1. 4.3 — Interaction labels paraphrased: Key Interactions item 9 (QRS line 591) rewrites the ER label “High-dose antioxidant supplements (vitamin C above 1 g daily, vitamin E)” as “High-dose vitamin C (over 1 g daily) and vitamin E”, dropping the “antioxidant supplements” class label; item 10 (QRS line 592) abbreviates the ER’s “other vasodilatory supplements” to “other vasodilators”.

Fixes 15/09/2026 03:36

  1. 4.3 — Interaction labels paraphrased: Restored the ER class labels in Key Interactions — “High-dose vitamin C (over 1 g daily) and vitamin E” became “High-dose antioxidants (vitamin C above 1 g daily, vitamin E)”, and “other vasodilators” became “other vasodilatory supplements”.

Issues 15/09/2026 03:31

  1. 4.5 — Content exceeds one A4 page: Estimated rendered height is roughly 1,450pt against the ~774pt available on A4 with the template’s 12mm print padding; the at-a-glance lede (lines 434–438), decision-gate lists (lines 571–603), protocol sub-lines (lines 456–488) and tier strings (lines 540–562, 615–636) all run at full sentence length rather than condensed.
  2. 11.4 — Mismatched time-to-effect sub-line: [time_2_sub] at line 516 states “Body-composition and plaque-relevant changes take a year or more” beneath the label “Blood pressure & HbA1c” and the value “8–12 weeks”, attaching an unrelated and much longer timeline to that cell.

Fixes 15/09/2026 03:31

  1. 11.4 — Mismatched time-to-effect sub-line: Replaced [time_2_sub] “Body-composition and plaque-relevant changes take a year or more” with “Resting pressure and blood sugar fall”, so the sub-line now describes the cell’s own label and 8–12 week value.
  2. 4.5 — At-a-glance lede condensed: Trimmed [at_a_glance] from 57 to 50 words, merging the mood/sleep/cognition list and shortening the cost clause.
  3. 4.5 — Protocol sub-lines condensed: Shortened all three [action_#_sub] strings (e.g. the polarised cell from “Roughly 80% of sessions below the first lactate threshold and 20% near maximal, avoiding the moderate middle” to “80% below the first lactate threshold, 20% near maximal”) and tightened [action_3_value] to “45–90 min base; 20–40 intervals”.
  4. 4.5 — Contraindication gate condensed: Rewrote all ten [stop_items] to single-line form (e.g. “New York Heart Association class IV” → “NYHA IV”, “above 200 mmHg systolic or 110 mmHg diastolic” → “above 200/110 mmHg”), preserving every threshold, time window and severity class.
  5. 4.5 — Key-interaction gate condensed: Trimmed the longest [caution_items] example lists to one or two drugs each and shortened the antioxidant entry to “High-dose vitamin C (over 1 g daily) and vitamin E”, keeping every ER interaction and its threshold.
  6. 4.5 — Benefits and Risks tiers condensed: Compressed [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [risks_medium], [risks_low] and [risks_speculative] to shorter forms of the same ER headings, dropping no benefit or risk.
  7. 4.5 — Monitoring condensed: Shortened [marker_1_target] and [marker_3_target] to single lines and compressed [monitoring_cadence] to “Daily resting heart rate and variability; fitness retest 8–12 weeks then 6–12 monthly; blood panel annually; coronary calcium imaging 3–5 yearly”.
  8. 4.5 — Qualitative items condensed: Tightened four of the six [qualitative_item_#] strings so each fits one rendered line, with no marker removed.