Audit: QRS - CDP-Choline for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 24/07/2026 06:31 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 82
Failed 0
N/A 9
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All protocol, benefit, risk, interaction, and monitoring content traces to the ER (e.g., 500 mg/day most-studied dose, ER line 345; markers, ER lines 425–429).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “Evidence is suggestive, not settled” mirrors ER conclusion “suggestive rather than settled” (line 458).
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Pregnancy/breastfeeding preserved from ER “should avoid or use caution” (line 323); no strengthening/softening detected.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Interactions and contraindications drawn from ER “Key Interactions & Contraindications” section; no cross-category relabeling.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 QRS contains no PMIDs, NCT IDs, expert names, or brand names.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions present.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Balanced, evidence-forward tone matches the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Expert and accessible; presents actionable protocol without hype.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents evidence; no prescriptive instruction.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Footer disclaimer present; content presents evidence.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Information presented, not recommended.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain-language throughout; technical terms minimized.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact cards and gates.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct reader address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing targets proactive health-oriented adults.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring framing assumes willingness to follow effortful protocols.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not written for general population.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Benefit framing for cognitive-aging adults, inherited from ER.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”… Proper names that contain “anti-aging”… are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” language used.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language… Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Formal terminology used; plain-language in At-A-Glance is appropriate per 7.4.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”); Gate headings (“Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”); Tier labels (“High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”); Table column headers in Monitoring (“Marker”, “Target”, “Why”). 🟢 All fixed headings and labels present and unmodified.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All expected data-qrs-var spans present.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Non-addressed spans unchanged.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No mapped ER text section is empty; the empty Benefits High tier is handled by 12.5 (display:none).
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Monitoring marker names and tier labels match the ER verbatim.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels preserved.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji present; ER conflicted markers stripped.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to fit one page.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment begins at line 2, first element after doctype.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 YAML delimited by — at lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in HTML comment.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; duration quoted appropriately.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: cdp_choline_2026-0724-0422_Opus_ER.md.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0724-0622.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus” is single word.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier 🟢 “Opus 4.8” — nickname plus version, no qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: cdp_choline_2026-0724-0422_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed and consistent.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”… The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “CDP-Choline for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “CDP-Choline for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 07/24/2026 (from 2026-0724).
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header carries only date, ER link, AI4L, and model.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion (line 458).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 57 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Memory, attention, optic-nerve, safety, and “suggestive not settled” all trace to the Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 Plain language; no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 311–325.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 “Pregnancy & breastfeeding” reflects ER “avoid” population (line 323).
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 <li>Pregnancy &amp; breastfeeding</li>.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations… No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash… Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise; rationale “(insufficient safety data)” appropriately dropped.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved… 🟢 No qualifying parenthetical of that type on this item.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering)… normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A No ranking notation in the ER contraindication content.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Stop_items are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 311–325.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Levodopa, cholinesterase inhibitors, choline donors/nootropics, anticholinergics, BP-lowering supplements, bipolar disorder; pregnancy excluded.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item wrapped in <li>.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations… No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash… Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise; no trailing dash clauses.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved… 🟢 Example drugs preserved (donepezil, rivastigmine, galantamine; diphenhydramine; alpha-GPC, huperzine A).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens… normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list… N/A No ranking notation in the ER interaction content.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Caution_items are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Derived from ER Therapeutic Protocol (lines 343–365).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, Timing, Frequency.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible… N/A Three actionable aspects are present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All three cells filled and ER-supported.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Memory (4–12 weeks), Attention (hours–days), Optic nerve (4–12 months).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Memory (Medium) first, then Low-tier Attention and Optic nerve.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible… N/A Three aspects are present.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All three cells filled and ER-supported (ER lines 396, 196).
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 158–217.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four variables present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers… Just the key fact. 🟢 Benefit descriptors are the ER subsection headings, condensed.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parenthetical content carried through.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”… 🟢 benefits_high (no High-tier ER benefit) correctly set display:none.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 234–295.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four variables present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers… Just the key fact. 🟢 Concise tier lists matching ER subsection headings.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parenthetical content; conflicted marker stripped.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”… N/A All four risk tiers contain items.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from ER Monitoring table (lines 423–429).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 Homocysteine, TMAO, Blood pressure, B12 and folate, Cognitive baseline all listed.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 “Reassess at 8–12 weeks after starting, then every 6–12 months if use continues” (ER line 420).

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from ER qualitative markers (lines 434–438).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All five qualitative markers listed verbatim.

Issues 24/07/2026 06:31

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.