Audit: QRS - Chinese Hawthorn for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 22/09/2026 17:08 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items	Count
Total	94
Passed	86
Failed	0
N/A	8
Pass Rate	100.00%

• Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
• Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
• N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

---

1. General Rules

#	Description	Result	Comments
1.1	Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER.	🟢
1.2	Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing.	🟢
1.3	The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”).	🟢
1.4	The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc.	🟢
1.5	PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact.	🟢
1.6	The QRS does not introduce new attributions.	🟢

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

#	Description	Result	Comments
2.1	The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing.	🟢
2.2	The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging	🟢
2.3	The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor	🟢
2.4	The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice	🟢
2.5	The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising”	🟢
2.6	The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance	🟢
2.7	The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon	🟢
2.8	Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner	🟢
2.9	It DOES NOT address the reader directly	🟢
2.10	The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review.	🟢
2.11	The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort.	🟢
2.12	The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort.	🟢
2.13	Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience.	🟢
2.14	The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim.	🟢
2.15	The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt.	🟢

3. Template Integrity

#	Description	Result	Comments
3.1	The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why”	🟢
3.2	All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS.	🟢
3.3	Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged	🟢

4. Formatting

#	Description	Result	Comments
4.1	When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied”	N/A	No ER section relied on by the QRS is empty; condition does not apply.
4.2	Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label.	🟢
4.3	Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented.	🟢
4.4	The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels.	🟢
4.5	The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page.	🟢

5. Metadata

#	Description	Result	Comments
5.1	The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content.	🟢
5.2	Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML.	🟢
5.3	The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet.	🟢
5.4	All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting.	🟢
5.5	The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]”	🟢
5.6	Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]”	🟢
5.7	Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430)	🟢
5.8	The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]”	🟢
5.9	The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT)	🟢
5.10	The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]”	🟢
5.11	The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4)	🟢
5.12	The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]”	🟢
5.13	All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting.	🟢

6. Page Title & Header

#	Description	Result	Comments
6.1	[page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., & for &)	🟢
6.2	[header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., & for &)	🟢
6.3	[header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY]	🟢
6.4	[header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]	🟢
6.5	No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker.	🟢

7. At-A-Glance Section

#	Description	Result	Comments
7.1	[at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence	🟢
7.2	[at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section	🟢
7.3	[at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words	🟢
7.4	Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER.	🟢
7.5	It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead	🟢
7.6	It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values)	🟢
7.7	It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results	🟢

8. Contraindications

#	Description	Result	Comments
8.1	The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section	🟢
8.2	[stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER	🟢
8.3	Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li>	🟢
8.4	Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact.	🟢
8.5	Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely).	🟢
8.6	When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol.	🟢
8.7	The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision.	🟢
8.8	If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g.	N/A	Section is not empty (8 contraindications present).

9. Key Interactions

#	Description	Result	Comments
9.1	The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section	🟢
9.2	[caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications	🟢
9.3	Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li>	🟢
9.4	Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact.	🟢
9.5	Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely).	🟢
9.6	When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol.	🟢
9.7	The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used.	🟢
9.8	If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g.	N/A	Section is not empty (9 interactions present).

10. Protocol

#	Description	Result	Comments
10.1	The section is derived from the ER Protocol section	🟢
10.2	The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section	🟢
10.3	If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing.	N/A	Three distinct actionable aspects exist in the ER Therapeutic Protocol.
10.4	All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section.	🟢

11. Time to Effect

#	Description	Result	Comments
11.1	The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER	🟢
11.2	The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit	🟢
11.3	If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing.	N/A	Three distinct time-to-effect aspects are populated.
11.4	All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER.	🟢
11.5	If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel	N/A	The ER provides time-to-effect information; section retained.

12. Benefits

#	Description	Result	Comments
12.1	The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section	🟢
12.2	Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative]	🟢
12.3	Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact.	🟢
12.4	Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved.	🟢
12.5	If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing.	N/A	All four benefit tiers are populated in the ER.

13. Risks

#	Description	Result	Comments
13.1	The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section	🟢
13.2	Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative]	🟢
13.3	Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact.	🟢
13.4	Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved.	🟢
13.5	If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing.	N/A	All four risk tiers are populated in the ER.

14. Monitoring

#	Description	Result	Comments
14.1	The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section	🟢
14.2	All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed	🟢
14.3	[monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty.	🟢

15. Qualitative Assessment

#	Description	Result	Comments
15.1	The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section	🟢
15.2	All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed	🟢

Issues 22/09/2026 17:08

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 22/09/2026 17:00

1. 1.1 / 7.4 — Lede misattributes lipid findings: The [at_a_glance] sentence at QRS lines 436-437 hangs “modest blood-pressure falls, improved blood fats” off the clause “The strongest trials tested European relatives, not the Chinese species”, but the ER sources the lipid result to Chinese multi-herb formulas (ER lines 162, 509) and attaches only the heart-failure finding to the European-species clause.
2. 1.2 — ER hedges dropped from lede: The ER Conclusion qualifies both non-cardiac findings (“though the trials disagree”; “mostly in studies where hawthorn was one herb among several”, ER line 509); [at_a_glance] states them without either hedge.

Fixes 22/09/2026 17:00

1. 1.1 / 7.4 — Lede misattributes lipid findings: Split the [at_a_glance] colon clause so the European-species finding now carries only “better exercise tolerance in mild heart failure, no fewer deaths”, with blood pressure and blood fats moved into their own sentence.
2. 1.2 — ER hedges dropped from lede: Restored the ER Conclusion’s caveats — “Blood pressure falls modestly, though trials disagree; blood fats improve in multi-herb formulas” — replacing the unhedged “modest blood-pressure falls, improved blood fats”. Lede trimmed elsewhere to stay within the 70-word budget.

Issues 22/09/2026 16:50

1. 1.4 — Benefit-modifying factor as timing: time_2_sub (QRS line 517) carries the ER’s baseline-response statement (“Response scales with the baseline abnormality; near-optimal starting values predict little measurable change”), which the ER presents as a benefit-modifying / dose-targeting factor (ER lines 207, 392), not as a time-to-effect fact — recasting effect magnitude as effect timing.

Fixes 22/09/2026 16:50

1. 1.4 — Benefit-modifying factor as timing: Replaced time_2_sub with an ER time-to-effect statement (“Lipid and blood-pressure trials measured change across this window”, ER line 429), removing the baseline-response magnitude claim that the ER presents as a benefit-modifying / dose-targeting factor.

Issues 22/09/2026 16:47

1. 9.5 — Antacid example drugs dropped: “Antacids and acid-suppressing agents” (QRS line 604) carries no example drugs while all eight sibling interactions do; the ER’s named examples “proton-pump inhibitors or calcium carbonate” (ER line 326) are dropped entirely.
2. 11.4 — Time-to-effect subs restate values: time_1_sub (line 503) and time_2_sub (line 516) repeat their own value cells verbatim (“8 weeks or later”, “8–16 weeks”) instead of adding the ER’s further detail, spending two of the sheet’s densest cells on filler.

Fixes 22/09/2026 16:47

1. 9.5 — Antacid example drugs restored: Expanded the antacid interaction item to “Antacids and acid-suppressing agents (proton-pump inhibitors, calcium carbonate)”, restoring the ER’s named examples so the gate matches its eight sibling items.
2. 11.4 — Time-to-effect subs made informative: Replaced time_1_sub with “Nothing in the literature supports judging hawthorn before a full 8 weeks of consistent dosing” and time_2_sub with “Response scales with the baseline abnormality; near-optimal starting values predict little measurable change”, so neither cell restates its own value.

Issues 22/09/2026 16:36

1. 2.5 — Imperative phrasing in protocol: [action_3_sub] (line 484) reads “split into two or three daily doses”, an instruction to the reader rather than a presentation of the ER’s finding that “Every positive trial used two or three daily doses” (ER line 384).
2. 9.4 — Redundant “(prescription)” tag: The first key-interaction item (line 596) reads “Digoxin (prescription)”; the regulatory-class tag is redundant detail and is inconsistent with the other eight items, from which the ER’s “(prescription)” / “(over-the-counter)” markers were dropped.

Fixes 22/09/2026 16:36

1. 2.5 — Imperative phrasing in protocol: Changed [action_3_sub] from “With or just after food; split into two or three daily doses” to “With or just after food; two or three daily doses”, removing the instruction to the reader.
2. 9.4 — Redundant “(prescription)” tag: Shortened the first key-interaction item from “Digoxin (prescription)” to “Digoxin”, matching the treatment of the other eight items.