Audit: QRS - Cnidium monnieri for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 17/08/2026 18:37 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 88
Failed 0
N/A 5
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All doses (3–10 g, 15–30 g, 250–500 mg 10:1, 10–98%), all biomarker targets, the cadence, both time-to-effect values, and every gate/benefit/risk item trace to explicit ER text.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “No dose has been validated in a controlled human trial” and “No human time-course exists” carry the ER’s hedges verbatim.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Contraindications remain contraindications; cautions remain cautions; tier assignments match the ER exactly.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Gates draw only from Key Interactions & Contraindications; Benefits/Risks only from their own ER sections; no modifying factor is surfaced as a gate.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT numbers, author names, or brand names appear anywhere in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No institutions, practitioners, or organisations are named.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Matches the ER’s sceptical, mechanism-aware register — preclinical claims flagged as such throughout.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Quantified targets and tiered evidence let a reader act on the material; nothing is alarmist or moralising.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents ranges and thresholds without issuing orders.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Descriptive throughout; the footer disclaimer is the template’s own.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 No “should”, “recommended”, or “advised” appears in the QRS’s own voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the rendered text.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms are confined to the places they carry information (CYP enzymes, furanocoumarins, biomarker names).
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Gate items, tier lines, and marker rows are stripped to key facts.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed; no direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Functional-range biomarker targets and a bone-turnover panel presuppose exactly this audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Decoctions, sitz baths, night-time application, and repeat laboratory panels are presented without apology.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 No simplification toward mass-market framing.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 At-A-Glance foregrounds the adulteration and phototoxicity ledger that matters most to a self-directed user.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “anti-aging” does not occur; the title uses “Health & Longevity”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “erectile response”, “phototoxic”, “contraindications”, “transaminases”; the plain-language wording in At-A-Glance is required by item 7.4.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All headings, gate headings, tier labels, and table headers are byte-identical to the template.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 Every template span is present; the marker_#_* and qualitative_item_# families are expanded to 8 and 6 numbered instances respectively.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 A full diff against the template shows changes confined to variable content, the two display: none tier spans, and the hidden time_3 cell.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section feeding the QRS is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels (“Traditional oral dose”, “Traditional external protocol”, “Extract equivalents”) and eight of the nine caution items reuse the ER bold labels verbatim; the ninth replaces the ER’s catch-all container label “Other interventions” with the interaction itself, as item 9.5 requires the substantive content be preserved.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 No invented labels; marker names match the ER biomarker table exactly.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji in the file; tiers are conveyed by bold labels plus the green/red card CSS.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content is condensed to the minimum permitted by the mandatory-completeness items (14.2, 15.2, 8.5, 9.5); the print rules and A4 @page sizing are intact.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Lines 2–14, immediately after <!doctype html>.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening --- at line 3, closing --- at line 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment; no corresponding visible element exists.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:04" is quoted, and it contains a colon requiring it.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: cnidium_monnieri_2026-0825-1350_Opus_ER.md, line 4.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02, matching the QRS.md badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0817-1816.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus, line 7.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus” — single word, no version.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5, line 8.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5” — nickname plus version, no context-window or other qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: cnidium_monnieri_2026-0825-1350_Opus_QRS.html, matching the file on disk.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Re-verified across all nine keys; no stray whitespace or unnecessary quoting.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Cnidium monnieri for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”, line 22.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Cnidium monnieri for Health & Longevity”, line 417.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 2026-0817-1816 → “08/17/2026”, line 421.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 5”, line 425.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header carries only the title and the template subline; the ER’s “Also known as” line is not carried over.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Mirrors the Conclusion’s structure: traditional record, the topical-only human evidence, preclinical bone/erectile claims, and the safety ledger.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 58 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause maps to a distinct Conclusion sentence; “most sexual-performance products tested” tracks the ER’s own “most products tested were found to contain undeclared prescription drugs”.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 “sun-sensitising compounds” for furanocoumarins, “a liver signal”, “slowed drug clearance”; no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial names, years, or sample sizes.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 Only the qualitative “modest improvement”; no SMD, RR, or percentages.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All seven items come from that section’s “Populations who should avoid” list plus its absolute-contraindication nitrate bullet.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All seven ER avoid-populations are represented, none added.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Seven <li> elements inside the span, lines 565–574.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s trailing clauses (“— no safety data at any dose…”, “where clearance is substantially impaired”, “given the adulteration risk…”) are all stripped; no dashes remain.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “above twice the upper limit of normal”, “Child-Pugh Class B or C”, the named nitrates and photosensitivity disorders, and “within two weeks of scheduled surgery” are all retained.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 The ER uses no ranking notation here; all parentheticals are plain comma-separated lists.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The ER identifies seven such populations, and the section is correctly populated.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All nine items map one-to-one onto ER caution bullets.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 The ER’s ten interaction bullets less the nitrate bullet (carried as an absolute contraindication) yields exactly the nine listed.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Nine <li> elements, lines 582–600.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Every ER mitigation clause (“Mitigation: check the international normalised ratio…”, “separate topical application from sun exposure…”) is stripped; no dashes remain.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 All named example drugs are preserved, including the three-way grouped supplement list and “high-dose paracetamol”.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking symbols in the ER; parentheticals are plain comma- and semicolon-separated lists.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The ER identifies ten such interactions, and the section is correctly populated.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 All three cells derive from the ER Therapeutic Protocol bullets.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Oral dose, external protocol, and extract equivalents are the three dose-determining bullets; the remaining bullets are modifiers rather than actions.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies at least three distinct actionable aspects; all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Nine populated spans, all ER-derived: 3–10 g, 15–30 g, 250–500 mg 10:1, split dosing with food, night-time topical application, 10–98% purity.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 The ER’s Practical Considerations “Time to effect” bullet yields exactly two distinct aspects — topical antipruritic and oral/bone — and both are carried.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Topical itch relief (Medium tier) precedes bone effects (Low tier).
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. 🟢 The third pcell carries style="display: none" with all three spans emptied, lines 522–532.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 “1–2 weeks” and the two-month rodent time-course both match the ER verbatim.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER does provide time-to-effect information, so the section is correctly retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 All nine benefit headings from the ER are represented at their ER tiers.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present, lines 540–555.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 ER headings condensed to bare phrases; no Magnitude figures (SMD −0.35, RR 1.29, SMD 3.08, 0.1–30 μM) carried over.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses appear in any benefits span.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 The ER has no High-tier benefit; benefits_high is emptied and set to display: none, line 540.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 All eight risk headings from the ER are represented at their ER tiers.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present, lines 612–630.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Condensed ER headings only; the 61%/150-product figures and the 21.9/18.1/13.1 μM inhibition constants are not carried over.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses appear in any risks span.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 The ER has no High-tier risk; risks_high is emptied and set to display: none, line 612.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Table and cadence both come from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All eight ER table rows are present in ER order — ALT, AST, GGT, INR, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, Serum CTX, P1NP, seated blood pressure — with targets and rationales matching.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Baseline, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, 1 and 4 weeks for anticoagulation, 6 months for bone turnover, then 6–12 months — matching the ER paragraph.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Drawn from the ER’s “Qualitative markers worth tracking alongside the laboratory values” list.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers are carried, in ER order and near-verbatim.

Issues 17/08/2026 18:37

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 17/08/2026 18:30

  1. 11.1 / 11.3 — Third time-to-effect set not a time-to-effect aspect: The ER supplies only two time-to-effect aspects (“Time to effect” in Practical Considerations: topical 1–2 weeks and oral/bone “a quarter at minimum”), yet time_3 (lines 524–533) is filled with “Suggested duration / 8–12 weeks oral” drawn from Discontinuation & Cycling; the unused third set should instead be left empty and made invisible.

Fixes 17/08/2026 18:30

  1. 11.1 / 11.3 — Third time-to-effect set emptied: Removed the “Suggested duration / 8–12 weeks oral” content from time_3, which came from Discontinuation & Cycling rather than the ER’s time-to-effect material, and left the three time_3 spans empty with the surrounding .pcell set to display: none.

Issues 17/08/2026 18:23

  1. 8.4 — Redundant trailing clause on nitrates: The nitrates contraindication at QRS lines 571–574 ends with “, including nitrate therapy for angina”, a trailing elaboration already covered by the head term “Nitrates and nitric oxide donors (nitroglycerin, isosorbide, amyl nitrite)”.

Fixes 17/08/2026 18:23

  1. 8.4 — Redundant trailing clause on nitrates: Stripped “, including nitrate therapy for angina” from the nitrates contraindication, leaving “Nitrates and nitric oxide donors (nitroglycerin, isosorbide, amyl nitrite)”.