Audit: QRS - DSIP for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 30/09/2026 07:15 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 94
Passed 89
Failed 0
N/A 5
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All protocol, time-to-effect, benefit, risk, gate and monitoring content traces to ER text (e.g., Therapeutic Protocol L300/302/305/307, Practical Considerations L334/337, Monitoring L351-374).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Cautious framing kept: “never tested in trials” (ER L337), “No established target; track change from own baseline” (ER L360), “unconfirmed in people” (ER L394).
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening or softening found; contraindications and interactions mirror ER L264-282.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come from the ER avoid-list, interactions from the ER interaction bullets, risks from Potential Risks; no cross-category relabeling.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT IDs, expert names or brand names; “Basel” and “World Anti-Doping Agency” appear in the ER for the same facts.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions; the ER protocol attribution “(Schneider-Helmert, Schoenenberger)” is dropped, not replaced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Neutral, evidence-weighing tone matches ER Conclusion.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Footer disclaimer present; items are stated as facts.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢  
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct reader address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 At a Glance weighs the thin evidence against self-injection risks for this audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Uses “injectable”, “injection”, “intravenous”, “subcutaneous”; no lay route phrasing.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and table headers identical to template.
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All template spans present; marker_#* expanded to marker_1..10, qualitative_item# to 1..5.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Non-checklist spans (evidence_review, audit, full_review website spans) and footer unchanged versus template.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” 🟢 Empty High/Medium tiers hidden via display:none per 12.5/13.5; no empty-state text needed elsewhere.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels “Basel clinical protocol”, “Peptide-clinic protocol”, “Time of day” match ER bold labels (L300, L302, L305).
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢  
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji in QRS.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Items condensed (interaction mitigations and contraindication explanations stripped); required full lists kept.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment immediately follows <!doctype html> (lines 1-2).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 YAML delimited by “—” lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside HTML comment; not surfaced elsewhere.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; duration “00:00” quoted because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: dsip_2026-0930-0553_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.9.29 matches QRS.md version.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0930-0654
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢  
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5.5
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢  
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename matches file name.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢  

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “DSIP for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “DSIP for Health & Longevity”
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 09/30/2026 matches 2026-0930-0654.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5.5
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢  

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens with what DSIP is (“a chain of nine amino acids sold as an injectable research product”) and its uses (sleep, stress resilience, healthy aging).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses ER Conclusion L390-394.
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 Exactly 70 words (script count).
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each sentence maps to ER Conclusion L390, L392, L394.
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢  
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 Seven items match ER “Populations who should avoid DSIP” L276-282.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Qualifiers kept: “(any trimester)”, “(≥15 breathing pauses per hour)”, “within the past 90 days”, “(prohibited class S0)”.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation in ER.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 Section populated.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Eight ER interaction bullets (L264-271) listed; “Other interventions” (no negative interaction, L272) correctly omitted.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Mitigations and rationales stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug lists preserved for all drug classes.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation in ER.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 Section populated.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢  
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Basel protocol (trial-tested), peptide-clinic protocol (current practice) and time of day/single dose (ER L300, L302, L305, L307).
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER provides at least three actionable aspects.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢  

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Onset of normalized sleep, older-adult delay and sleep-pressure onset (ER L334).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 All three relate to the lead benefit (sleep), ordered from main outcome to onset detail.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER provides three time-to-effect aspects.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢  
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢  
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢  
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Low and Speculative items are ER headings without qualifiers or effect sizes.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high and benefits_medium set to display: none (ER L131, L135 state none reach these tiers).

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢  
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢  
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢  
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high set to display: none (ER L214).

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢  
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 10 ER table biomarkers listed with ER targets and “Why” text (ER L357-366).
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence matches ER L351-353.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢  
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 5 ER qualitative markers listed verbatim (ER L370-374).

Issues 30/09/2026 07:15

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 30/09/2026 07:12

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained jargon “ischemia”: The speculative risk at line 585 reads “Harm during acute heart or brain ischemia”; “ischemia” is unexplained medical jargon, whereas the ER glosses it as “blocked blood flow” (ER line 246) and calls it “acute heart blockage” in the Conclusion.

Fixes 30/09/2026 07:12

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained jargon “ischemia”: Replaced “harm during acute heart or brain ischemia” in risks_speculative with “harm during acutely blocked blood flow to the heart or brain”, using the ER’s own gloss.

Issues 30/09/2026 07:09

  1. 1.3 — Hedge dropped in At a Glance: QRS line 433 states “Side effects were mild in the few hundred people studied over weeks”, while the ER Conclusion (line 392) says “Reported side effects were mild”; omitting “Reported” strengthens the ER claim.

Fixes 30/09/2026 07:09

  1. 1.3 — Restored ER hedge wording: Changed “Side effects were mild” to “Reported side effects were mild” in At a Glance to match the ER Conclusion, and reworded “The longevity case rests entirely” to “Longevity evidence rests entirely” to keep the section at 70 words.

Issues 30/09/2026 07:07

  1. 8.5 — Unstable angina qualifier dropped: The Contraindications item at QRS line 545 omits the ER parenthetical “(chest pain at rest or rapidly worsening)” (ER line 279) entirely, although 8.5 requires parenthetical qualifiers to be trimmed but never dropped.

Fixes 30/09/2026 07:07

  1. 8.5 — Unstable angina qualifier restored: Changed the Contraindications item from “Heart attack, unstable angina or stroke within the past 90 days” to “Heart attack, unstable angina (chest pain at rest or rapidly worsening) or stroke within the past 90 days”, restoring the ER parenthetical.

Issues 30/09/2026 07:02

  1. 1.2 — Limited-data caveat dropped: At a Glance (line 433) says “Reported side effects were mild” but omits the ER Conclusion caveat that “the people studied numbered only a few hundred, over weeks rather than years” (ER line 392).

Fixes 30/09/2026 07:02

  1. 1.2 — Limited-data caveat restored: Replaced “Reported side effects were mild” in At a Glance with “Side effects were mild in the few hundred people studied over weeks”, trimming other wording to stay within 70 words.

Issues 30/09/2026 06:57

  1. 2.7 — Unexpanded monitoring acronyms: The Monitoring table lists “ISI score” (line 604) and “AHI” (line 648) as bare acronyms never expanded on the sheet, although the ER expands both (Insomnia Severity Index; apnea–hypopnea index).

Fixes 30/09/2026 06:57

  1. 2.7 — Unexpanded monitoring acronyms: Expanded marker names from “ISI score” to “Insomnia Severity Index (ISI)” and from “AHI” to “Apnea–hypopnea index (AHI)”, using the ER Context-column expansions.