Audit: QRS - Japanese Knotweed for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 25/06/2026 02:21 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 86
Failed 0
N/A 5
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All QRS content traces to ER passages (Conclusion, Protocol, Benefits, Risks, Monitoring, Key Interactions).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 QRS preserves cautious framing (e.g., “rest mainly on lab and animal work”, “theoretical anthraquinone hepatotoxicity”, “Speculative” tier).
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Strength of claims matches ER; contraindications and risk tiers unchanged.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications/Interactions derive from the ER “Key Interactions & Contraindications” section; benefits/risks from their own sections. No miscategorization.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 QRS contains no PMIDs, NCT IDs, citations, expert names, or brands.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Objective, evidence-graded tone consistent with ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Tone is expert yet accessible and data-driven.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents evidence rather than prescribing.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directive medical advice; footer disclaimer present.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Content presents facts/biomarkers without recommending.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain language used; technical terms minimal.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact card/table layout, terse items.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct reader address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing targets risk-aware longevity audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol/titration/monitoring content assumes effort-willing audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not pitched to general population.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Risk/benefit weighting reflects the optimization audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “longevity” framing used; no “anti-aging” voice.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Formal terminology used throughout.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings/labels present and unchanged.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All expected data-qrs-var spans present.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Non-targeted spans unchanged.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” 🟢 High benefit/risk tiers are empty in ER; QRS hides them via display:none rather than inventing content (consistent with 12.5/13.5). No section requires empty-state phrasing.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Labels (e.g., monitoring markers) align with ER wording.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels faithful to ER.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators in QRS; styling is CSS-based.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to single-page layout.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element after doctype (lines 2-14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 YAML delimited by — at lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; only “duration” quoted (contains colon).
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: japanese_knotweed_2026-0625-0114_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18 matches QRS.md version.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0625-0114.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus” is single word.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 4.8” = nickname + version, no qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: japanese_knotweed_2026-0625-0114_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values clean; quoting only where required.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Japanese Knotweed for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Japanese Knotweed for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 06/25/2026 from 2026-0625.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header contains only title and standard subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion (lines 432-436).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 56 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Commercial resveratrol source, inflammation/oxidative signal, lab/animal basis, laxative/bleeding/quality drawbacks all in Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 Plain terms (“inflammation”, “lab and animal work”); “resveratrol” named as the plant compound, consistent with ER’s lay framing.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trials cited.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No effect sizes or statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from ER line 295 “Populations who should avoid this intervention”.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All six contraindications match the ER avoid-list.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Six <li> items.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash. Just the key fact. 🟢 Items terse; mechanistic rationales from ER stripped.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible. 🟢 “(breast, uterine, ovarian)” and “within ~2 weeks” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking symbols in source; lists are plain comma-separated.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Contraindications are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 281-291.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Six interaction bullets carried; warfarin-without-supervision (the contraindication) is distinct from the general anticoagulant interaction.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Six <li> items.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash. Just the key fact. 🟢 “Caution”/consequence clauses from ER stripped; items terse.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible. 🟢 Example drug lists preserved (warfarin/apixaban/etc., statins, fish oil/vitamin E/ginkgo, etc.).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking symbols; lists plain comma-separated.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Key interactions are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Derived from ER Therapeutic Protocol (lines 317-327).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Whole-root dosing, resveratrol-standardized dosing, split dosing with food — the key actionable aspects.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three actionable aspects are present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All three cells filled with ER-derived content.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Inflammatory markers (4-6 wk), Lyme symptoms (weeks-months), trial reassessment (8-12 wk) from ER lines 350/368.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Inflammatory-marker benefit (Medium, strongest signal) leads; ordering defensible.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three time-to-effect aspects are present.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All three cells filled with ER-derived content.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 147-199.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four tier variables present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Tier items are terse keyword lists.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried into benefit items.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high set to display:none (ER High benefits empty); medium/low/speculative filled.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Derived from ER lines 217-263.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four tier variables present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Risk items are terse.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried into risk items.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high set to display:none (ER High risks empty); medium/low/speculative filled.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from ER Monitoring Protocol table (lines 396-402).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 hs-CRP, ALT/AST, eGFR, INR, fasting lipid panel — all five ER biomarkers listed with targets.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence reflects ER lines 393-394 (baseline, 8-12 wk, every 6-12 mo; warfarin INR 1-2 wk).

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from ER qualitative markers (lines 406-410).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 Energy/fatigue, joint comfort, cognitive clarity, sleep quality, digestive tolerance — all five listed.

Issues 25/06/2026 02:21

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 25/06/2026 02:18

  1. 4.3 — Label abbreviated (OTC): caution_items (QRS line 558) abbreviates the ER’s verbatim label “Over-the-counter NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) and aspirin” (ER line 287) to “OTC NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) and aspirin”, introducing an acronym in place of the spelled-out label.

Fixes 25/06/2026 02:18

  1. 4.3 — Label abbreviation expanded: Restored the ER’s verbatim label by changing “OTC NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) and aspirin” back to “Over-the-counter NSAIDs (ibuprofen, naproxen) and aspirin” in the Key Interactions gate.

Issues 25/06/2026 02:13

  1. 13.4 — Parenthetical not stripped in risk item: risks_low (line 579) keeps the parenthetical “(estrogenic)” in “hormonal (estrogenic) activity”; item 13.4 requires parenthetical content in risk tier items be stripped.

Fixes 25/06/2026 02:13

  1. 13.4 — Strip parenthetical in risk item: Changed risks_low from “hormonal (estrogenic) activity” to “hormonal estrogenic activity”, removing the parenthetical per the no-parenthetical rule for risk tier items.