Audit: QRS - Kiwi for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 19/08/2026 08:42 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 83
Failed 0
N/A 10
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Spot-checked every populated span against the ER: protocol cells vs ER lines 369/371/381, time-to-effect vs ER line 430, benefit and risk tiers vs the ER Expected Benefits / Potential Risks & Side Effects headings, gates vs ER lines 322–343, all 11 markers vs the ER monitoring table (lines 464–474), cadence vs ER line 460, qualitative items vs ER lines 478–483.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 The ER’s “⚠️ Conflicted” flags on blood pressure and cholesterol are carried through as “(conflicted)”; marker_2 and marker_11 keep the ER’s “No established target” wording.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Absolute contraindications stay in the stop gate, “Caution”/”Monitor” items stay in the interactions gate; no tier or certainty was shifted.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Stop items come only from the ER’s “Populations who should avoid Kiwi” sub-list; caution items only from the ER interaction bullets; nothing from Benefit-Modifying Factors or Risk-Modifying Factors was promoted into a gate.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, author names, NCT identifiers or brand names (Actazin, Livaux, Zyactinase, Zespri) appear anywhere in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions of any kind in the sheet.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Flat, declarative, evidence-first register throughout, matching the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 At-a-glance leads with what holds up, then names what is unresolved and the single real hazard.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Cells state doses and windows as trial facts (“The dose in nearly every positive trial”), not instructions.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No imperatives; cadence is phrased as a schedule of measurements, not a directive.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 No occurrences of “recommend”, “advise”, “should” in the document’s own voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms are confined to biomarker names and decision-gate thresholds where they are load-bearing; the at-a-glance is jargon-free.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Every item is a fragment or single clause; no item carries a citation or mechanism.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed — no direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing assumes a reader who will run baseline labs and keep a bowel diary.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Daily two-fruit habit, cultivar selection and an 11-marker panel are presented without hedging on effort.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Content depth (Act d 1 specific IgE, 24-hour urinary oxalate) is well beyond general-population material.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 The conflicted cardiometabolic signals are labelled as such rather than sold, and the vitamin C benefit is scoped to those starting low.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “anti-aging” does not occur; the title uses “Health & Longevity”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “adverse events”, “complete spontaneous bowel movements”, “international normalised ratio” are used in the ER’s own register.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All present byte-identical to [qrs_template] at lines 445, 491, 541, 572, 592, 618, 646, 650–652, 823, and the four tier labels in both the benefits and risks cards.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 Diff of the extracted var names shows all 34 template vars present; the only additions are the repeatable marker_#_* (11 rows) and qualitative_item_# (6 items) instances the template defines as repeatable.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 The three <span website="..."> hooks, the disclaimer, the stylesheet link and all CSS are unchanged from the template.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No ER section mapped by this template is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 “Standard dose”, “Cultivar selection” and “Best time of day” are the ER’s own bold labels (ER lines 369, 371, 381); the monitoring row labels are the ER biomarker-table names verbatim.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Time-to-effect labels (“Stool frequency”, “Plasma vitamin C”, “Mood and vitality”) are lifted from the ER’s own sentence at line 430 rather than invented.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No codepoint in the emoji ranges occurs in the file; the ER’s “⚠️ Conflicted” markers are rendered as plain “(conflicted)”.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every section is condensed rather than transcribed: benefits and risks are heading-level fragments, gate items are stripped of trailing clauses, marker_2’s target is shortened from the ER wording, and no section was extended with additional cards or rows beyond the template.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Lines 2–14; the comment opens immediately after <!doctype html> on line 1.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening --- at line 3, closing --- at line 13; the descriptive text sits on line 2 before the opener.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment; no metadata value is repeated in the header or footer.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:02" is quoted, and it contains a colon; all other values are bare and trimmed.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4: er_filename: kiwi_2026-0825-0623_Opus_ER.md.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 Line 5: qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 Line 6: qrs_creation_date: 2026-0819-0827.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Line 7: qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus” — single word, no version.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Line 8: qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5” — nickname plus version only.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Line 9 matches the actual file on disk: kiwi_2026-0825-0623_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Re-verified across all ten keys; no stray whitespace or unnecessary quoting.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 22: Kiwi for Health &amp; Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet, matching ER canonical_topic.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 417: Kiwi for Health &amp; Longevity.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 Line 421: 08/19/2026, matching qrs_creation_date: 2026-0819-0827.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Line 425: Opus 5.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 The header block is structurally identical to the template; the ER’s “Also known as” line was not carried over.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Four clauses map to ER conclusion lines 505 (laxation), 505 (vitamin C and mood), 507 (unresolved BP/cholesterol/sleep) and 509 (allergy).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 59 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause traces to a separate sentence of the ER Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 Plain wording throughout (“bowel movements”, “fibre supplements”, “vitamin C shortfall”); no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial, author or year is named.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No numbers other than “Two” as a dose count.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All four items come from the ER’s “Populations who should avoid Kiwi” sub-list (ER lines 340–343).
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 4 ER contraindication entries → 4 stop items, none added or dropped.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Lines 575–587: four <li> elements inside the span.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s “— absolute contraindication” and “— absolute contraindication pending allergy testing” tails are stripped, and the leading “Anyone with” is dropped from item 1.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “stage 4 or worse”, “(eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m²)”, “above 5.5 mmol/L” and “24-hour urinary oxalate above 45 mg/day” are all retained.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation inside parentheses in this section.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The ER does name such populations and the section is correctly populated rather than empty.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All eight items map one-to-one to the ER bullets at lines 322–336.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 8 ER interaction bullets → 8 caution items; no overlap with the four stop items.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Lines 595–608: eight <li> elements inside the span.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Every ER mechanism sentence (“Additive potassium load risks hyperkalaemia…”, “Platelet aggregation falls about 15%…”) is stripped; only the drug-class label remains.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 All ER example-drug parentheticals retained verbatim (spironolactone/amiloride/lisinopril/losartan; aspirin/clopidogrel/apixaban; fish oil/ginkgo/garlic/vitamin E; polyethylene glycol 3350/psyllium).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation inside parentheses in this section.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The ER names eight such interactions and the section is populated accordingly.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 All three cells trace to the ER Therapeutic Protocol bullets at lines 369, 371 and 381.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, cultivar and timing are the three bullets that change what a reader actually does; the remaining ER bullets are commentary on guidelines, competing approaches and subgroups.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies at least three actionable aspects and all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine spans are populated; no placeholder text remains.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Stool frequency, plasma vitamin C and mood/vitality — the three windows the ER states at line 430.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered High (constipation relief), High (vitamin C repletion), Medium (mood and vitality); the respiratory-symptom window, a Low benefit, is folded into time_3_sub rather than given a slot.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies at least three distinct windows and all three sets are used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All nine spans populated from ER lines 430, 164, 166 and 478.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER does provide time-to-effect information (Practical Considerations, line 430).

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 All 11 ER benefit headings are represented across the four tiers.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present and populated (lines 543–565).
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each entry is the ER heading reduced to a fragment; the ER’s Magnitude: lines and mechanism paragraphs are entirely absent.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 The ER’s parenthetical glosses (CSBM, LDL-C, HbA1c expansions) are stripped; the only parentheses left are the ER’s own “Conflicted” evidence flags, which items 1.2/1.3 require be preserved.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers have items in the ER.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 All seven ER risk headings are represented across the four tiers.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present and populated (lines 620–640).
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each entry is the ER heading reduced to a fragment; no prevalence figures, relative risks or mechanism text carried over.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses appear in any of the four risk spans.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers have items in the ER.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Rows and cadence come from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section (lines 458–474).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 11 ER table rows present, in ER order: plasma vitamin C, CSBM/week, ferritin, potassium, eGFR, hs-CRP, LDL-C and ApoB, HbA1c, blood pressure, 24-hour urinary oxalate, specific IgE to Act d 1. Targets and “Why” text match the ER.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Lines 811–817 condense ER line 460, keeping baseline/4-week checks, the conditional potassium check, the 6–12 month interval and the warfarin INR rule.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Taken from the “Qualitative markers worth tracking alongside the labs” list at ER lines 476–483.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six ER bullets present verbatim as qualitative_item_1 through qualitative_item_6.

Issues 19/08/2026 08:42

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 19/08/2026 08:39

  1. 2.8 — Time-to-effect sub-lines restate labels: time_1_sub (“Stool frequency and consistency change.”) and time_2_sub (“Plasma vitamin C saturates.”) repeat their own labels at QRS lines 503 and 514, consuming space on a one-page sheet without adding information beyond the label and value.

Fixes 19/08/2026 08:39

  1. 2.8 — Time-to-effect sub-lines restate labels: Replaced time_1_sub “Stool frequency and consistency change.” with “Consistency shifts alongside frequency; straining improved ahead of it in several trials.” and time_2_sub “Plasma vitamin C saturates.” with “Marginal status moves into the saturating range; those already replete change little.”, so both sub-lines add ER-sourced information instead of repeating their labels.

Issues 19/08/2026 08:33

  1. 11.4 — Time-to-effect sub mismatched: [time_3_sub] (lines 525–527) states “Respiratory-symptom effects required four weeks of daily intake.”, which does not describe the cell’s own label “Mood and vitality” or its value “2 weeks”, unlike the parallel subs in cells 1 and 2.

Fixes 19/08/2026 08:33

  1. 11.4 — Time-to-effect sub mismatched: Rewrote [time_3_sub] from “Respiratory-symptom effects required four weeks of daily intake.” to “Mood and vitality shift; respiratory-symptom effects require four weeks.” so the sub describes the cell’s own “Mood and vitality” label and “2 weeks” value.