Audit: QRS - L-Arginine for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 05/09/2026 03:22 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 83
Failed 0
N/A 10
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Spot-checked every populated span against the ER; all content traces to ER text (e.g. Protocol l.391-395, Practical Considerations l.444, Monitoring table l.476-484).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 No cautious-phrasing passage is restated more firmly; e.g. marker_9_target keeps the ER’s “No established target” wording verbatim.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Benefit and risk tiers mirror the ER’s own High/Medium/Low/Speculative grading; no claim is up- or down-graded.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications draw only on the ER’s “Populations who should avoid L-Arginine” list plus the nitrate bullet the ER itself labels an absolute contraindication; no Benefit- or Risk-Modifying Factor is repurposed.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT identifiers, author names, years or sample sizes anywhere in the QRS. Pycnogenol is the only brand name and appears in the ER for the same interaction (ER l.349).
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions of any kind are present.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Register matches the ER: measured, non-promotional, signal-and-limitation framing.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Expert but accessible; targets and thresholds are given without hedging or hype.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents thresholds and observations; issues no instructions.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No advisory constructions; the template disclaimer is the only clinical-referral text.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Cadence and protocol cells are stated as noun phrases (“Full baseline panel before the first dose”), not recommendations.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns; verified by full-file scan.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms are confined to the decision gates and monitoring table where precision is required; the At-A-Glance uses plain-language equivalents.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Every section is reduced to labels, values and short qualifiers; no prose beyond the At-A-Glance.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed: no direct address anywhere in the document.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Content assumes a reader who will test biomarkers, titrate doses and track qualitative markers.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Nine-marker monitoring panel, split dosing and empty-stomach timing all presuppose willingness to follow an inconvenient protocol.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Detail level and biomarker targets are well beyond general-population framing.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 The risks card carries the post-infarction mortality and C-reactive-protein signals with the same prominence as the benefits, matching the ER’s balance.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No occurrence of “anti-aging” in the document.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Clinical register throughout; the few plain-language terms (“heart attack”, “empty stomach”) are the ER’s own wording and, in the At-A-Glance, required by 7.4.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and table column headers are byte-identical to the template.
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 template variables present; marker_#* and qualitative_item# correctly expanded to 9 and 7 instances respectively.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Structural diff against the template shows changes only inside data-qrs-var spans; the website=”evidence_review”, website=”audit” and website=”full_review” spans, the CSS block and the footer disclaimer are untouched.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No ER section feeding the QRS is empty; every source section carries content.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol cell labels reuse the ER’s bold bullet labels verbatim (“Standard dose range”, “Split dosing rather than a single bolus”, “Best time of day”); interaction labels likewise.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 No label is invented; time-to-effect labels name the three endpoints the ER itself lists in its Time to effect bullet.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji characters in the file; tiering is carried by the template’s bold labels and CSS.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Sections are condensed to the minimum consistent with the mandatory completeness items (8.2, 9.2, 14.2, 15.2): gate items are stripped to the key fact, benefits and risks to the ER’s headings, and the At-A-Glance to 59 words. No content is carried at full ER length.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment opens at line 2, immediately after <!doctype html>, before any other content.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening — at line 3, closing — at line 13; the preceding title text is outside the block.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment and not echoed by any rendered element.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 All values trimmed; only duration is quoted, correctly so because “00:03” contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: l_arginine_2026-0905-0002_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0905-0315, correct YYYY-MMDD-HHMM form.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Single word, no version or qualifier.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Nickname plus version number, no additional qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: l_arginine_2026-0905-0002_Opus_QRS.html, matching the file on disk.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Confirmed for all nine frontmatter keys.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 L-Arginine for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet, matching the ER canonical_topic with the ampersand entity-encoded.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 header_topic is “L-Arginine for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 qrs_creation_date 2026-0905 renders as 09/05/2026.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 header_subline_model is “Opus 5”, matching qrs_creator_ai_fullname.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header is byte-identical to the template apart from the three variable spans; no badge, AKA line, version stamp or audit date.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion (l.514-518): mechanism, the three supported effects, the dose-limiting harm, and the two harm signals.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 59 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause maps to a distinct Conclusion passage: l.514 (mechanism), l.516 (blood pressure, erectile function, pre-eclampsia), l.518 (gut limit, the two harm signals).
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms; pre-eclampsia is rendered as “the dangerous blood-pressure disorder of pregnancy” and myocardial infarction as “heart attack”.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial names, years, sample sizes or p-values.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No effect sizes, confidence intervals or relative risks.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section (l.335-363).
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All seven populations from the ER’s “Populations who should avoid L-Arginine” list plus organic nitrates, which the ER labels an absolute contraindication (l.337); eight items total.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is a separate <li> inside the stop_items span.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Trailing rationale clauses from the ER are stripped, e.g. “on the basis of the halted post-infarction trial”, “where ammonia clearance is impaired” and “where unopposed vasodilation is hazardous”.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Time window (past 6 months), severity classes (Child-Pugh Class C, NYHA Class IV), enzyme list and thresholds (below 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, above 5.5 mmol/L) all retained; only “estimated glomerular” is trimmed from the filtration-rate qualifier.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER’s contraindication list uses no ranking notation inside parentheses.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The section is populated, and correctly so: the ER names eight avoid conditions.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section (l.335-353).
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 All nine ER interaction bullets are present; the organic-nitrate bullet is correctly omitted because it is carried as a contraindication.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is a separate <li> inside the caution_items span.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Caution/Monitor labels, mechanistic sentences and Mitigation clauses are all stripped; the em-dash drug-class glosses inside the antihypertensive parenthetical are removed.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Named example drugs and agents are preserved for every item, including those the ER carried in body text rather than the bold label (pre-workout blends, salt substitutes, ornithine, histidine, sauna, alcohol).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER’s interaction list uses no ranking notation inside parentheses.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The section is populated, and correctly so: the ER names ten interactions.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Therapeutic Protocol section (l.391-395).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose range, dose splitting and timing are the three actionable bullets in the ER Protocol section; the remainder are modifiers, competing approaches and attribution.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER names more than three actionable implementation aspects; all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine action spans carry ER-derived content.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Blood pressure, erectile function and wound healing are exactly the three endpoints in the ER’s Time to effect bullet (l.444).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered blood pressure, erectile function (both High-tier benefits, in ER order) then wound healing (Medium).
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER names three time-to-effect aspects; all three sets are used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All nine time spans carry ER-derived content; values 2-4, 4-12 and 2-8 weeks match the ER.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER does provide time-to-effect information, so the section is retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Expected Benefits section (l.151-237).
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four tier spans are present and populated.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Items are the ER’s benefit headings only; no magnitudes, confidence intervals, trial counts or mechanism.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 The ER’s benefit headings carry no parentheticals, and none is introduced.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers contain items in the ER, so none is hidden.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section (l.257-317).
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four tier spans are present and populated.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Items are the ER’s risk headings only; the 8.3%-versus-2.3% adverse-event rate, the six deaths and the P value are all omitted.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 The ER’s risk headings carry no parentheticals, and none is introduced.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers contain items in the ER, so none is hidden.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section (l.470-484).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All nine rows of the ER biomarker table are carried, with Target and Why cells verbatim.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 monitoring_cadence reproduces the ER’s front-loaded schedule (l.470-472), including the baseline panel, week 2/4, week 12 and the 6-12 month interval.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Drawn from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section (l.486-494).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All seven qualitative markers from the ER list are carried verbatim.

Issues 05/09/2026 03:22

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.