Audit: QRS - L-Citrulline for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 28/08/2026 13:32 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 84
Failed 0
N/A 9
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Every cell traces to the ER: protocol cells to Therapeutic Protocol (ER 360-376), time cells to Practical Considerations (ER 413) and ER 362, benefit/risk items to the ER tier headings, monitoring rows to the ER biomarker table (ER 445-453), qualitative items to ER 457-463.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Cautious framing preserved: “Absent safety data in pregnancy and lactation” (ER “Absent Safety Data in Pregnancy and Lactation”); marker_9_target keeps “No established target; track change from the individual’s own baseline”.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening or softening detected; “Pregnancy and lactation” remains a contraindication, speculative risks remain in the Speculative tier.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come from the ER “Populations who should avoid” list, Key Interactions from the ER interaction bullets, Qualitative Assessment from the ER qualitative marker list. No category crossover.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, study citations, author names, NCT identifiers or brand names appear anywhere in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions of any kind are introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Voice, hedging and register match the ER throughout.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No imperatives or clinical instructions; the footer disclaimer is unmodified template text.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the file (verified by search).
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms are limited to those the ER itself carries in its biomarker table and contraindication list.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the file (verified by search).
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 At-A-Glance carries the responder-population signal (“Gains cluster in raised pressure, past middle age, diabetes or excess weight”), which is what differentiates this audience from the average person.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No occurrence of “anti-aging”; the document uses “inflammatory aging” and “age-related”, matching the ER.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Document voice stays clinical (“Gastrointestinal discomfort”, “Symptomatic hypotension”); the plainer register in At-A-Glance is required by item 7.4 and is ER Conclusion wording.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: * Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment” * Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions” * Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative” * Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings and labels present verbatim: “Protocol” (line 445), “Time to effect” (491), “Benefits” (538), “Contraindications” (571), “Key Interactions” (590), “Risk & Side Effects” (636), “Monitoring” (657), “Qualitative Assessment” (807); tier labels and “Marker”/”Target”/”Why” unchanged.
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 template variable names are present; marker_#* and qualitative_item# are expanded to nine and seven numbered instances respectively.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Non-variable spans (website=”evidence_review”, website=”audit”, website=”full_review”) and the entire stylesheet are byte-identical to the template.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No ER section that maps to a QRS variable is empty, and the ER contains no empty-state phrasing such as “Not formally studied”. The absent High risk tier is governed by item 13.5.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 ER bold labels reused verbatim in Key Interactions (all eight drug-class labels) and Protocol (“Standard vascular dose”, “Best time of day”, “Pre-exercise dose”); marker names match the ER table rows.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 No label paraphrased or abbreviated. The three Time-to-effect labels are derived descriptors because the ER carries no per-item labels for them, which item 11.4 requires.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji characters in the file (verified by search); the ER’s ⚠️ Conflicted markers and tier squares are correctly dropped.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every section is condensed to headings and key facts rather than carried over at ER length: benefits and risks are reduced to bare tier headings, contraindications and interactions to a single clause each, and the ER biomarker table’s Context/Notes column is dropped entirely.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 The metadata comment spans lines 2-14, immediately after <!doctype html> on line 1 and before any other comment or markup.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening --- on line 3, closing --- on line 13; the preamble text on line 2 sits outside the YAML block.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment and not duplicated anywhere in the rendered body.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 All values trimmed; the only quoted value is duration: "00:03", which requires quoting because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: l_citrulline_2026-0828-1027_Opus_ER.md (line 4).
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02 (line 5) matches the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0828-1322 (line 6) in YYYY-MMDD-HHMM form.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus (line 7).
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Single word, no version or qualifier.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5 (line 8).
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Nickname plus version number only, no qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: l_citrulline_2026-0828-1027_Opus_QRS.html (line 9) matches the file on disk.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Confirmed again across all nine frontmatter keys.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 <title>L-Citrulline for Health &amp; Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet</title> (line 22), with the ampersand entity-encoded.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 L-Citrulline for Health &amp; Longevity (line 417), matching the ER canonical_topic.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 08/28/2026 (line 421), the MM/DD/YYYY form of qrs_creation_date 2026-0828.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5 (line 425).
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 The header div contains only the title and the standard subline; no AKA line, badge, version stamp or audit date.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condensed from the ER Conclusion (ER 487-493): mechanism, strongest evidence, responder population and tolerability.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 54 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause maps to a distinct Conclusion passage — mechanism (ER 487), vascular findings and the meta-analysis disagreement (ER 489), responder clustering (ER 489), tolerability and split dosing (ER 491).
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms; “pooled analyses” replaces “meta-analysis”, “heavy effort” replaces “exertion”. The only technical word is the substance name “arginine”, whose consequence is stated in the same clause.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial names, years, sample sizes or p-values.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No effect sizes, confidence intervals or statistical results.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from the ER “Populations who should avoid L-Citrulline” list inside Key Interactions & Contraindications (ER 331-338).
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All six ER contraindications are present, in ER order.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Six <li> elements inside the [stop_items] span (lines 574-585).
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each item is a single clause; the ER’s trailing rationale “on the basis of absent rather than negative evidence” is stripped from the pregnancy item.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Preserved: the specialist-supervision exception, “Child-Pugh Class C”, “eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m²”, “below 100 mmHg”, “within 90 days”. Only the ER’s lay glosses (“a measure of filtration capacity”, “heart attack”) are dropped.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation inside parentheses in its contraindication list.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The section is populated, and the ER does identify populations that should avoid the intervention, so leaving it non-empty is correct.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not left empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from the eight interaction bullets of the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section (ER 315-329).
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 All eight ER interactions are present; none duplicates a contraindication.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Eight <li> elements inside the [caution_items] span (lines 593-626).
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each item reduces the ER bullet to a short consequence clause (e.g. “additive blood pressure reduction”, “potentially severe hypotension”); monitoring advice, separation intervals and reassurance text are stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 All seven parenthetical drug/agent lists are carried through verbatim.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation inside parentheses in its interaction list.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The section is populated, and the ER does identify interactions, so leaving it non-empty is correct.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not left empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Derived from the ER Therapeutic Protocol section (ER 358-380).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose (6 g daily), schedule (split morning and evening) and the pre-exercise dose are the three implementation decisions the ER protocol turns on; the 10 g escalation is folded into action_1_sub.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER protocol supplies more than three distinct actionable aspects, so no set is unused.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine action fields carry ER-derived content; no placeholders remain.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Chronic vascular response (4-7 weeks) and the acute response (within 60 minutes) come from ER 413; the 8-week non-response decision point comes from ER 362.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered chronic resting blood pressure and endothelial function first (the two High-tier benefits with reported magnitudes), then the acute vascular and performance effects, then the dosing decision point.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three distinct time-related aspects are available in the ER, so no set is unused.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All nine time fields carry ER-derived content; no placeholders remain.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER does provide time-to-effect information (ER 413), so the section is correctly retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Derived from the ER Expected Benefits section (ER 153-235).
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present and populated (lines 540-564).
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each item is the ER benefit heading alone; magnitudes, confidence intervals, mechanisms and the ⚠️ Conflicted markers are dropped.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 The ER benefit headings contain no parenthetical content, and none has been introduced.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four benefit tiers carry items in the ER, so no span needs hiding.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section (ER 253-293).
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present (lines 638-651).
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each item is the ER risk heading alone; the 14.63% incidence figure, the 24 g/day tolerance data and the mechanistic rationale are all dropped.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No frequencies, severity grades or study references carried through.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 The ER states “No risk reaches High”, and [risks_high] is set to style="display: none" with empty content (line 638) rather than empty-state text.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section (ER 437-453).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All nine ER table rows are present with names, targets and rationales matching the ER verbatim.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 [monitoring_cadence] (lines 796-801) condenses the ER cadence paragraph (ER 441), including the day one-to-three window for anyone on antihypertensives or nitrates.

15. Qualitative Assessment

| # | Description | Result | Comments | |—|————-|:——:|———-| | 15.1 | The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section | 🟢 | Derived from the qualitative marker list in the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section (ER 455-463). | | 15.2 | All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed | 🟢 | All seven ER qualitative markers are present, verbatim and in ER order. |

Issues 28/08/2026 13:32

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.