Audit: QRS - Methylphenidate for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 20/09/2026 20:00 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 83
Failed 0
N/A 10
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All protocol values (5 mg 2–3× daily → 20–60 mg; 18 mg → 54–72 mg; 30–60 minutes; 4–6 weeks; 3–4 hours per dose), all nine biomarker targets, the cadence sentence, all benefit/risk items and all gate items trace to ER lines 443–453, 498, 526–545, 410–419 and the Expected Benefits / Potential Risks headings.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “No established numeric target” (marker_8_target) and “No established target; track change from own baseline” (marker_9_target) mirror ER lines 535–536; “Pregnancy (guidance stays cautious)” mirrors ER line 419.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Tier placement matches the ER exactly; the conflicted items stay in the same Low tier the ER assigns them, and the pregnancy gate keeps the ER’s cautious qualifier rather than dropping or hardening it.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 No content from ER Benefit-Modifying Factors (lines 241–251) or Risk-Modifying Factors (lines 365–375) appears anywhere in the QRS; gates draw solely on Key Interactions & Contraindications.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 The QRS contains no PubMed ID, citation, expert name, NCT identifier or brand name.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions of any kind in the QRS body.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Terse, declarative, evidence-first register throughout, matching the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Numeric targets and tiers carry the data; the At-A-Glance opens with the established effect before the costs.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Descriptive noun phrases (“Osmotic-release capsules each morning, raised in 18 mg steps”) rather than instructions.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No imperatives, no “should”, “must”, “recommend” or “advise” anywhere in the body.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Every cell states what is done or observed, not what the reader ought to do.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns present.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms retained are condition names with no shorter equivalent (pheochromocytoma, priapism, Raynaud’s phenomenon); explanatory cells use plain wording (“Iron limits the enzyme that makes dopamine”).
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Gate items and tier lists are short phrases; the At-A-Glance is 59 words.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed by scan for second-person forms; none found.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Home blood-pressure logging, ferritin and thyroid targets and qualitative self-tracking all presume a proactive adult.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Nine-marker panel, staged cadence and six qualitative trackers presuppose effortful follow-through.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Optimal functional ranges (ferritin 50–100 ng/mL, TSH 0.5–2.0 mIU/L) are tighter than conventional reference ranges, matching the ER’s stated framing.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 The At-A-Glance separates the diagnosed from the non-diagnosed adult case, the distinction that matters for this readership.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “anti-aging” does not occur; the title uses “Health & Longevity”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 No “pill”, “shot”, “by mouth” or equivalent; formulation is named formally (“Immediate-release”, “Osmotic-release capsules”, “Extended-release”).

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed strings match the template byte-for-byte (QRS lines 440, 477, 519, 539, 555, 581, 600, 604–606, 719 and the four tier labels in both tier cards).
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 Programmatic set comparison against core/qrs/QRS.html: no template variable missing; the only extras are the expected marker_1..9_* and qualitative_item_1..6 expansions of the marker_#_* / qualitative_item_# row templates.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 The three non-variable spans (website="evidence_review", website="audit", website="full_review") are unchanged at QRS lines 423, 426 and 434.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section used by the QRS is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 “Immediate-release titration”, “Extended-release once-daily dosing”, “Best time of day”, “Time to effect” and “Half-life and coverage” are the ER’s bold labels verbatim (ER lines 443, 445, 451, 453, 498); every Key Interaction item leads with the ER’s bold label.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels carry the ER wording; “Time to optimal dose” names the second half of the ER’s own Time to effect bullet, which the sheet must split because 11.1 requires three distinct time sets.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji in the QRS; tiers are rendered with <strong> labels and the CSS palette only.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every item is compressed to a short phrase and all explanatory clauses, mechanisms and effect sizes are stripped; item counts are fixed by the ER via 9.2, 14.2 and 15.2 and cannot be reduced further.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 QRS lines 2–14, immediately after <!doctype html> on line 1.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening --- at line 3, closing --- at line 13; the preamble text on line 2 sits before the opening delimiter.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed entirely in an HTML comment; no element on the sheet repeats any metadata value.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:03" is quoted, and it contains a colon; all other values are bare and untrimmed of nothing.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4: er_filename: methylphenidate_2026-0920-1614_Opus_ER.md.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 Line 5: qrs_prompt_version: 26.9.11, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 Line 6: qrs_creation_date: 2026-0920-1941.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Line 7: qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus” is a single word with no version or qualifier.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Line 8: qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5” is nickname plus version with no trailing qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Line 9 matches the file on disk: methylphenidate_2026-0920-1614_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Re-verified across all nine keys; only the colon-bearing duration value is quoted.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 22: Methylphenidate for Health &amp; Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet, matching ER frontmatter canonical_topic with the ampersand encoded.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 417: Methylphenidate for Health &amp; Longevity.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 Line 421: 09/20/2026, the correct MM/DD/YYYY rendering of 2026-0920-1941.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Line 425: Opus 5, matching the frontmatter value.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 The header block (lines 415–428) is the template block with only the three variables substituted.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Compresses ER lines 569–571: mechanism, the diagnosed-population effect, the non-diagnosed effect, and the cost profile.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 59 words by word count.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each of the four sentences maps to a distinct clause of the ER Conclusion (lines 569 and 571).
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms; “alertness and reward chemicals” replaces dopamine/noradrenaline and “people meeting diagnostic criteria” replaces the ADHD label.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial name, year or sample size appears.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No SMD, odds ratio, hazard ratio or confidence interval appears.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All nine items trace to ER lines 380, 384 and 412–419.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 The eight bullets of “Populations who should avoid Methylphenidate” plus the day-of-surgery anaesthetic contraindication from ER line 384 (“Caution to absolute contraindication on the day of surgery”).
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Nine <li> elements at QRS lines 542–550.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Definitional glosses and the pregnancy citation are stripped; no dash-trailing clause survives in any item.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “within the past 14 days”, “within 90 days”, “at or above 180/110 mmHg”, “without supervised dispensing” and “(halothane, sevoflurane, desflurane)” are all retained.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation inside parentheses in this section.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The section is populated, and the ER does identify such populations, so the constraint holds.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not left empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All fourteen items trace to ER lines 382–408.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Every non-contraindicated ER interaction bullet is present; the MAOI bullet and the anaesthetic clause are correctly excluded because they appear in the Contraindications gate.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Fourteen <li> elements at QRS lines 558–571.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s explanatory glosses (“compounds mimicking adrenaline —”, “an early antidepressant generation —”, “the common modern antidepressant class —”, “drugs that block dopamine signalling”) and all mitigation sentences are stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Named example drugs are retained for every bullet that carries them (sympathomimetics, midodrine/droxidopa, tricyclics, SSRIs, stimulant supplements, blood-pressure-lowering supplements); lists are trimmed, never dropped.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation inside parentheses in this section.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The section is populated and the ER lists fifteen interaction bullets, so the constraint holds.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not left empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 All three action sets come from ER Therapeutic Protocol lines 443, 445 and 451.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Immediate-release titration, extended-release once-daily dosing and timing of day are the three execution decisions the ER’s remaining bullets (genetics, sex, age, payer incentives) all modify rather than replace.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER mentions thirteen actionable protocol aspects, so no set is unused.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine cells carry ER-derived content; none is empty or placeholder.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Onset (30–60 minutes), time to optimal dose (4–6 weeks) and per-dose duration/coverage are the only time-to-effect quantities the ER supplies (lines 453 and 498).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered from the fastest, most directly experienced effect through titration to the coverage window that governs the dosing schedule.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three distinct time-to-effect aspects exist in the ER, so no set is unused.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All nine cells carry ER-derived content; the half-life sub-cell combines ER lines 453 and 130.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER does provide time-to-effect information, so the section is correctly retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 All fourteen items correspond one-to-one with the ER’s #### benefit headings at lines 152–236.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans are present and populated (QRS lines 521–532) with the ER’s 3 / 5 / 4 / 2 tier distribution.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each item is the ER heading reduced to a noun phrase; no Magnitude figure, mechanism sentence or evidence note carries over.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses appear anywhere in the four benefit spans.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four benefit tiers have items in the ER, so no span needs hiding.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 All sixteen items correspond one-to-one with the ER’s #### risk headings at lines 262–360.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans are present and populated (QRS lines 583–594) with the ER’s 6 / 2 / 7 / 1 tier distribution.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each item is the ER heading reduced to a noun phrase; no frequency, relative risk or mechanism carries over.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses appear anywhere in the four risk spans.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four risk tiers have items in the ER, so no span needs hiding.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Table and cadence both derive from ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success, lines 524–536.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All nine ER table rows are present in order: resting pulse, blood pressure, body weight, sleep latency and total sleep, ferritin, TSH, fasting glucose, electrocardiogram, full blood count — with targets matching the ER’s optimal functional ranges.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 QRS line 713 reproduces the ER’s cadence sentence from line 524, including the one-week-after-dose-change rule and the annual blood panel.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Drawn from the ER’s “Qualitative markers tracked alongside the laboratory panel” list, lines 540–545.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers are present verbatim at QRS lines 722–737.

Issues 20/09/2026 20:00

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 20/09/2026 19:57

  1. 1.2 — Electrocardiogram target drops ER hedge: [marker_8_target] (QRS line 692) reads “Sinus rhythm; corrected QT below 450 ms in men, 460 ms in women”, omitting the ER’s “No established numeric target” qualifier (ER line 535), while [marker_9_target] preserves the equivalent hedge for the full blood count.

Fixes 20/09/2026 19:57

  1. 1.2 — Electrocardiogram target hedge restored: [marker_8_target] changed from “Sinus rhythm; corrected QT below 450 ms in men, 460 ms in women” to “No established numeric target; sinus rhythm, corrected QT below 450 ms in men, 460 ms in women”, matching the ER’s own qualifier.

Issues 20/09/2026 19:52

  1. 1.1 — Coverage hours not ER-supported: [time_3_sub] (QRS line 511) claims “modified-release designs stretch coverage to 10–12 hours”, but the ER’s general statement is “extended-release designs stretch coverage to 8–12 hours” (ER line 130); the 10–12 hour figure applies in the ER only to osmotic-release capsules (ER line 445).

Fixes 20/09/2026 19:52

  1. 1.1 — Coverage hours aligned to ER: [time_3_sub] changed from “modified-release designs stretch coverage to 10–12 hours” to “extended-release designs stretch coverage to 8–12 hours”, matching the ER’s general statement at ER line 130.

Issues 20/09/2026 19:47

  1. 12.3 / 12.4 — “(conflicted)” qualifier in benefits: [benefits_low] at line 528 preserves three added parentheticals “(conflicted)”; section 12’s preamble states the tier already encodes evidence strength, so such qualifiers must be stripped.
  2. 13.3 / 13.4 — “(conflicted)” qualifier in risks: [risks_low] at line 590 preserves three added parentheticals “(conflicted)”, which section 13 requires to be stripped for the same reason.
  3. 4.3 — Invented time-to-effect label: [time_2_label] at line 494 is “Optimal dose”, a label found nowhere in the ER, and paired with the value “4–6 weeks” it misreads as a dose rather than the time the ER says titration to the optimal dose takes.

Fixes 20/09/2026 19:47

  1. 12.3 / 12.4 — “(conflicted)” stripped from benefits: Removed the three “(conflicted)” parentheticals from [benefits_low], leaving “Reduced cancer-related fatigue; … reduced use in stimulant use disorder; reduced depressive symptoms as add-on treatment”.
  2. 13.3 / 13.4 — “(conflicted)” stripped from risks: Removed the three “(conflicted)” parentheticals from [risks_low], leaving the cardiovascular, growth-suppression and tic items as bare tiered descriptors.
  3. 4.3 — Time-to-effect label corrected: Changed [time_2_label] from “Optimal dose” to “Time to optimal dose” so the label matches its value “4–6 weeks” and the ER’s statement that finding the optimal dose takes four to six weeks.