Audit: QRS - Oral Minoxidil for Hair Regrowth

Audit conducted on 25/06/2026 04:36 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 91
Failed 0
N/A 0
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All QRS content traces to ER passages (Conclusion, Protocol, Benefits, Risks, Interactions, Monitoring).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “Benefits fade after stopping” mirrors ER “benefits are not permanent… fade after stopping”; speculative tiers preserved.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening/softening; contraindications kept as hard gates.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Categories match ER source sections exactly.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT IDs, expert names, or citations appear in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Objective, data-aware tone consistent with ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Balanced expert/accessible tone maintained.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents evidence, no prescriptive directives.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Footer disclaimer present; content is descriptive.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Information-presentation framing used throughout.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain-language equivalents used (e.g., “faster heartbeat”).
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact card/table layout, terse items.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct address present.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing fits proactive, risk-aware adult.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol/monitoring detail assumes engaged audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not pitched to passive general population.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Risk/benefit weighting matches ER and audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” usage.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Uses “oral minoxidil”/”daily application”; no consumer slang.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified (card/section headings, gate headings, tier labels, Monitoring column headers). 🟢 All fixed headings present and unmodified (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”, “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”, “Marker”/”Target”/”Why”).
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the QRS. 🟢 Full set of data-qrs-var spans present.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 No unaddressed spans modified.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” 🟢 No empty source sections; all populated.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Tier labels and marker labels match ER.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Marker names match ER table verbatim.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji in rendered content; CSS/bold used.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Single-sheet layout with condensed items.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element after doctype (lines 2-14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 YAML delimited by — at lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; duration quoted (contains colon).
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: oral_minoxidil_hair_2026-0625-0326_Opus_ER.md (line 4).
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18 matches QRS.md version.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0625-0326 (line 6).
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus (line 7).
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus” is single word.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8 (line 8).
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier 🟢 “Opus 4.8” — nickname + version only.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: oral_minoxidil_hair_2026-0625-0326_Opus_QRS.html (line 9).
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values clean; only duration quoted (justified).

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”. The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Oral Minoxidil for Hair Regrowth - Quick Reference Sheet” (line 22); no entities needed.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Oral Minoxidil for Hair Regrowth” (line 417).
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 “06/25/2026” matches 2026-0625 (line 421).
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 4.8” (line 425).
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header contains only title and standard subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Distills the ER Conclusion (lines 436-438).
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 54 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Off-label use, density/thickness, on par with topical, hypertrichosis, edema/heart rate, fade after stopping all in Conclusion.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 Plain language (“blood-pressure drug”, “common hereditary hair loss”, “scalp solution”); no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No statistics cited.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Items drawn from ER lines 290, 302.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 Guanethidine, pheochromocytoma, recent MI <90 days, heart failure, pulmonary HTN with mitral stenosis, uncontrolled arrhythmia, kidney impairment, pregnancy/breastfeeding.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is a separate <li> (lines 542-549).
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details, or content after a dash. 🟢 Terse items, no trailing clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item. 🟢 ”(<90 days)” preserved on recent heart attack.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) normalize to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation present in source items.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty 🟢 Contraindications present, so section populated.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Items drawn from ER lines 288-304.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Guanethidine (a contraindication) correctly excluded.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item a separate <li> (lines 557-562).
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details, or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise items, no trailing clauses.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved. 🟢 Example drug lists preserved (ACE inhibitors, ARBs, etc.; ibuprofen, naproxen; pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine; potassium, magnesium, etc.).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens normalize to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation present in source items.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty 🟢 Interactions present, so section populated.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, titration, timing drawn from ER Therapeutic Protocol (lines 326-336).
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, Titration, Timing — the key actionable aspects.
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible. 🟢 All three sets filled; condition not triggered.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Doses (women 0.625–1.25, men 2.5–5 mg/day), low-and-slow titration, morning timing all from ER.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Visible regrowth, fuller results, early shedding from ER (line 375).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered visible regrowth → fuller results → early shedding.
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible. 🟢 Three aspects present; condition not triggered.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 3–6 months, ~12 months, first weeks all from ER.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel 🟢 ER provides time-to-effect data; section retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Tiers mirror ER Expected Benefits (lines 164-204).
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four tier spans present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, or mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Terse phrasings; no magnitudes or mechanisms.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 “(Diameter)” from ER header stripped.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 All four tiers have content; condition not triggered.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Tiers mirror ER Potential Risks (lines 226-266).
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four tier spans present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, or mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Terse phrasings; no frequencies or mechanisms.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 “(Hypertrichosis)”, “(Edema)”, “(Tachycardia)”, “(Pericardial/Pleural Effusion)” stripped.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 All four tiers have content; condition not triggered.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Markers and cadence drawn from ER Monitoring Protocol (lines 395-408).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 6 markers present: resting heart rate, blood pressure, ferritin, TSH, serum potassium, body weight.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 “Baseline, then at ~4 weeks and 3 months, then every 6–12 months” matches ER (line 399).

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Qualitative items drawn from ER qualitative markers (lines 412-416).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 5 qualitative markers present (reduced shedding, increased coverage, confidence, absence of side effects, photographic regrowth).

Issues 25/06/2026 04:36

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.