Audit: QRS - Oxytocin for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 11/04/2026 18:36 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 97
Passed 88
Failed 0
N/A 9
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All claims, labels and values trace to the ER (Conclusion, Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, tiers, Key Interactions & Contraindications, Monitoring table).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Gate hedges kept: “inferred, no data in these groups” (line 550), “inferred, no human data” (line 553); lede keeps “lacks long-term data”.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening or softening found; lede “not body weight” matches ER “Net: no weight benefit”.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come from “Populations who should avoid”; interactions from Documented/Theoretical lists; tiers as in ER.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, citations, expert names, NCT IDs or brand names appear.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Neutral, evidence-reporting tone mirrors the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Monitoring phrases (“a positive result stops use”, “signaling a need to stop”) are carried verbatim from the ER.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses the reader directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms (SIADH, SSRIs, NSAIDs, DXA, QT-prolonging) are part of ER labels carried verbatim.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.11 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Lede frames the narrow evidence for health-focused adults, as in the ER Conclusion.
2.13 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording.
2.14 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “injection”, “nasally”, “nasal dose” used; no lay route terms.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: • Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”
• Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”
• Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”
• Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why”
🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and Marker/Target/Why headers unchanged.
3.2 Every element carrying a data-qrs-var attribute in [qrs_template] is present in the QRS with the same name 🟢 All template data-qrs-var names present; # patterns expanded to 1..5 markers and 1..6 qualitative items.
3.3 Everything outside the data-qrs-var spans — markup, text, styles, comments — is as in the template; spans that no checklist item addresses are left unchanged as well 🟢 Diff against template shows changes only inside data-qrs-var spans, the metadata block and the required display:none on risks_medium.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 An empty ER section never produces visible empty-state text in the QRS: the corresponding region is hidden or left empty. Phrases such as “None documented in human trials to date” or “Not formally studied” appear only where the ER uses them for a fact the QRS carries over. 🟢 No empty-state text; empty Medium risk tier hidden.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 ER bold labels used for protocol, contraindication, interaction and qualitative labels.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Only glosses and example names trimmed (e.g., halothane/desflurane, azithromycin dropped); at least one example kept.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. It fails this item only for one of four things: a trailing clause after a dash, an optional gloss, an example list left untrimmed, or a repetition. Nothing else is cut to fit. 🟢 No trailing dash clauses, optional glosses, untrimmed example lists or repetitions found.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢  
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢  
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢  
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 duration “00:03” quoted because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢  
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 26.10.25 matches QRS.md.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 2026-1104-1818
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢  
5.9 The nickname of the AI is the full name without the version number, with all remaining words joined by hyphens (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini-Flash, GPT); when the full name has no version number or is “Unknown”, the nickname equals the full name 🟢 Opus
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢  
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the model name (the word or words directly before the version number, leaving out the first if there is more than one, e.g., Claude Opus 5.5 → Opus 5.5), the model version number and the variant (if any) as stated in the system prompt or developer instructions of the creating model, with every word capitalized and without product, effort or pricing names (e.g., Opus X.Y, Sonnet X.Y, Grok X.Y, Gemini X.Y Flash, GPT X.Y), the model name alone when the system prompt or developer instructions name a model without a version number (e.g., Grok), or “Unknown” when neither the system prompt nor the developer instructions of the creating model name a model 🟢 Opus 5.5
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢  

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Oxytocin for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢  
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 11/04/2026 matches qrs_creation_date 2026-1104-1818.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢  
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢  

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens with “the body’s bonding and birth hormone, is a prescription medicine” and its obstetric uses before any verdict.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢  
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 Exactly 70 words.
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢  
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢  
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All six ER “Populations who should avoid” items present (lines 548–553).
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Threshold “below 135 mmol/L”, condition list and “(injected oxytocin)” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation in the ER.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 Section is populated; the ER names populations to avoid.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
9.2 [caution_items] represent the ER’s documented interactions — the items under its “Documented interactions:” label — excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications and any entry phrased as no interaction found 🟢 Eight documented interactions listed; Alcohol (“no interaction found”) correctly excluded.
9.3 [caution_theoretical_items] represent the ER’s theoretical interactions — the items under its “Theoretical interactions (inferred from mechanism, not studied in humans):” label 🟢 All four theoretical interactions listed.
9.4 The ER placeholder “None identified” is never an item: it means that group is empty 🟢  
9.5 Individual [caution_items] and [caution_theoretical_items] are formatted as <li></li>. The template’s bold “Theoretical (inferred from mechanism)” sub-heading is the only marker of the second list’s status: no item carries “(theoretical)”, “inferred from” or a mechanism clause 🟢 No “(theoretical)” or mechanism clauses on items.
9.6 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
9.7 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug lists preserved in trimmed form.
9.8 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 No ranking notation in the ER.
9.9 If the ER’s theoretical group is empty, the whole Theoretical block — the caution_theoretical span with its sub-heading and list — is hidden with style="display:none", not removed: its spans stay in place, empty. N/A ER theoretical group is not empty.
9.10 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 Section is populated; the ER names documented interactions.
9.11 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on, and the Theoretical block is hidden per 9.9. E.g. N/A Section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Therapeutic Protocol section 🟢  
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from that section 🟢 Standard single research dose, healthy-aging regimen and appetite/metabolic regimen.
10.3 If fewer than three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER, the unused sets are left empty and hidden with style="display:none", not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER names more than three actionable aspects.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from that section. 🟢  

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Meal size, chronic outcomes and blood/brain-fluid levels from ER Practical Considerations.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Benefit-linked windows (meal size, lean mass) precede the pharmacokinetic window.
11.3 If fewer than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER, the unused sets are left empty and hidden with style="display:none", not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER gives three time-to-effect aspects.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢  
11.5 If the ER provides no information on time to effect at all, the whole Time to effect block (its subhead and all three sets) is hidden with style="display:none", not removed: its spans stay in place, empty. N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢  
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢  
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Items are the ER benefit headings only.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
12.5 If a tier (high, medium, low, speculative) has no items, its span is hidden with style="display:none", not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four benefit tiers have items.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢  
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢  
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢  
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
13.5 If a tier (high, medium, low, speculative) has no items, its span is hidden with style="display:none", not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 ER Medium risk tier is empty; risks_medium span hidden with style=”display:none” (line 597).

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section 🟢  
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from that section are listed, one table row per marker; the template’s # row is the pattern, repeated with # replaced by 1, 2, 3 … in the data-qrs-var names 🟢 All five ER table biomarkers listed as marker_1..marker_5; serum osmolality appears only as a context note for sodium.
14.3 [marker_#name] is the marker, [marker#target] its target value or range as given in the ER, [marker#_why] its purpose in a few words; a target the ER does not give is written “Not specified in the ER” 🟢 Targets match the ER table.
14.4 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from that section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢  
14.5 If the ER names no measurable biomarker, the table is hidden with style="display:none" and the single # row is left as in the template N/A The ER names measurable biomarkers.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section 🟢  
15.2 All subjective/qualitative markers from that section are listed, one <li> per marker; the template’s # item is the pattern, repeated with # replaced by 1, 2, 3 … 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers listed as qualitative_item_1..6.
15.3 If the ER names no qualitative marker, the card’s list is hidden with style="display:none" and the single # item is left as in the template N/A The ER names qualitative markers.

Issues 11/04/2026 18:36

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 11/04/2026 18:32

  1. 4.5 — Untrimmed example list: The Key Interactions item at line 562 keeps the full four-name list “Inhaled anesthetics (cyclopropane, halothane, sevoflurane, desflurane)” although the dense sheet runs past one A4 page and other example lists were trimmed.

Fixes 11/04/2026 18:32

  1. 4.5 — Inhaled anesthetics list trimmed: Shortened the Key Interactions item from “(cyclopropane, halothane, sevoflurane, desflurane)” to “(cyclopropane, sevoflurane)”, keeping the FDA-label example and one current agent.

Issues 11/04/2026 18:29

  1. 4.5 — Time-to-effect sub repeats label: time_1_sub at line 495 (“Meal-size effects appear at the first meal after a nasal dose”) restates the label “Meal size” and value “First meal” instead of adding information.

Fixes 11/04/2026 18:29

  1. 4.5 — Time-to-effect sub repeats label: Replaced time_1_sub “Meal-size effects appear at the first meal after a nasal dose” with “Single doses reduced meal intake, preferentially fat; trials dosed shortly before meals”, taken from the ER Nutrition habit item.

Issues 11/04/2026 18:25

  1. 1.2 — Lede drops data hedge: The At a Glance (line 439) states “Short-term nasal use looks reassuring” without the ER Conclusion’s cautious phrasing “though long-term human data are lacking” (ER line 517).
  2. 14.3 — Monitoring purpose dropped: marker_4_why “Conflicting LDL and HDL shifts in trials” (line 662) and marker_5_why “Lean-mass gain in a pilot trial” (line 673) omit the ER’s purpose “Expected to change:”, while rows 1–3 keep “Safety check:”.

Fixes 11/04/2026 18:25

  1. 1.2 — Restored long-term data hedge: Changed the At a Glance from “Short-term nasal use looks reassuring” to “Nasal use looks reassuring short-term but lacks long-term data”, and shortened “mostly taken as a nasal spray” to “mostly taken nasally” to stay within 70 words.
  2. 14.3 — Restored monitoring purpose: Prefixed marker_4_why and marker_5_why with the ER’s purpose “Expected to change:”, matching ER table rows for lipids and lean mass.

Issues 11/04/2026 18:21

  1. 1.1 — Pregnancy test scope broadened: The monitoring_cadence at line 680 lists a baseline “pregnancy test” for everyone, while the ER (line 477) limits it to “women who could be pregnant”.

Fixes 11/04/2026 18:21

  1. 1.1 — Pregnancy test scope restored: Changed the monitoring_cadence baseline from “heart rate and pregnancy test” to “heart rate and, for women who could be pregnant, pregnancy test”, matching the ER.