Audit: QRS - Panax quinquefolius for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 20/08/2026 12:50 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 83
Failed 0
N/A 10
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All protocol values, time-to-effect windows, gate items, tiered benefits/risks, biomarker rows and cadence trace to ER lines 156–190, 244–288, 328–336, 356–380, 415, 443–466.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “contested blood-pressure signal” (line 433) mirrors ER “contested signal on blood pressure” (ER line 488); Speculative tiers retained as Speculative.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Avoid-populations stay in Contraindications, monitor-level items stay in Key Interactions; no severity drift observed.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Gates draw only from ER Key Interactions & Contraindications; Benefit- and Risk-Modifying Factors are not surfaced anywhere.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT IDs, author names or brand names (Cereboost, CVT-E002, COLD-fX) appear in the QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 Institutional attributions from ER lines 358–362 (St. Michael’s, Swinburne, Mayo Clinic) are stripped, none added.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Register matches the ER’s measured, non-promotional voice.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Gate and cadence entries are stated as noun phrases and passive observations, not instructions.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 No “should”, “recommended”, or “advised” in the document’s own voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the file.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Retained technical terms (CYP3A4, hs-CRP, eGFR) are ER-sourced biomarker and drug-class names where no plain equivalent exists.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed by pronoun scan.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Ten-marker monitoring panel and 8–12 week protocols assume this audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 At-a-glance flags sponsor funding and batch-chemistry dependence, the two caveats that matter to this audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “Health & Longevity” in the title; no occurrence of “anti-aging”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “blood sugar” / “blood thinner” appear only inside At-A-Glance, where item 7.4 mandates plain-language substitutes; ER Conclusion uses the same wording.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fifteen fixed strings byte-identical to [qrs_template].
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 template variables present; marker_#* expanded to 10 rows and qualitative_item# to 5 items as the template’s repeatable pattern intends.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 website="evidence_review", website="full_review" and website="audit" spans are untouched; CSS, footer and disclaimer identical to template.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section mapped by this checklist is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 “Standard metabolic protocol”, “Standard cognitive protocol”, “Standard fatigue protocol” verbatim from ER lines 358–362; biomarker names verbatim from the ER table.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢  
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 Zero emoji in the file; the ER’s “⚠️ Conflicted” markers are stripped.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every section is materially condensed against its ER source; no section carries trailing prose.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Lines 2–14, immediately after the doctype.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening --- line 3, closing --- line 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment; no duplicate rendering elsewhere.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:03" is quoted, correctly, because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 Line 5: 26.7.02, matching the QRS.md badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 Line 6: 2026-0820-1245.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Line 7.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus”.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Line 8.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5”.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Line 9, matches the file on disk.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Re-verified across all nine keys.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 22: “Panax quinquefolius for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 417.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 Line 421: 08/20/2026 from 2026-0820-1245.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Line 425: “Opus 5”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header block is template-identical apart from the three variable spans.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Line 433 condenses ER lines 488–492.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 Exactly 60 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Chemistry difference, glycemic primacy, fatigue/memory/blood-pressure ranking, safety, warfarin hazard, sponsor funding and batch chemistry each map to a distinct Conclusion sentence.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 “blood sugar”, “blood-thinner”, “tiredness”, “short-term memory”, “batch chemistry” — no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All eight items map to ER lines 330–336.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All seven ER avoid-population bullets represented; the autoimmune/transplant bullet is split into two items, both ER-sourced.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Lines 542–549.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 ER glosses “(which lowers estrogen production)”, “(anti-rejection drugs such as …)” and “given absent human safety data” are all stripped; no dash-trailing clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 INR targets 2.0–3.0 / 2.5–3.5, HbA1c below 6.0%, 14-day surgical window, “any trimester”, “under 12” all retained.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation in this section.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 Section is populated, and the ER does name avoid-populations.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All eight items map to ER lines 310–324.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 The two omitted ER bullets — vitamin K antagonists and immunosuppressive/biologic therapy — are already carried as Contraindications.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Lines 557–564.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 ER glosses “which make the kidney excrete sugar”, “which slow stomach emptying”, “both of which relax arteries”, “older antidepressants that block …” and every Mitigation clause are stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Every ER example-drug list is retained in full.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation in this section.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 Section is populated, and the ER does name such interactions.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 ER Therapeutic Protocol lines 358–366.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 The metabolic, cognitive and fatigue protocols are the ER’s three named standard regimens.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies three distinct actionable aspects.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Nine spans populated; “taken in the morning” in action_2_sub is drawn from the ER “Best time of day” bullet.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Glycemic control, cancer-related fatigue and working memory, per ER line 415 and the benefit entries.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 High tier first (glycemic control), then the Medium-tier benefits in ER order (fatigue, then working memory).
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies three distinct time-to-effect aspects.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 “4–8 weeks” from ER line 415; “8 weeks” and the missed four-week endpoint from ER lines 164–166; “1–6 hours” peaking near three hours from ER lines 176–178.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER does provide time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Eleven benefit headings from ER lines 152–220, all tiers preserved.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four populated at lines 521–532.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Bare benefit names only; all Magnitude lines omitted.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses in any benefit item.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers carry items in the ER.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Seven risk headings from ER lines 244–288, all tiers preserved.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four populated at lines 576–587.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Bare risk names only; all Magnitude lines omitted.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses in any risk item.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers carry items in the ER.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success, lines 443–458.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All ten ER table rows present with verbatim names, targets and rationales.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Line 717 condenses ER line 445.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 ER lines 462–466.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All five ER qualitative markers present verbatim.

Issues 20/08/2026 12:50

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.