Audit: QRS - Periodic Phlebotomy for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 29/08/2026 04:52 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 84
Failed 0
N/A 9
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Protocol cells trace to ER lines 357–361; time-to-effect to ER line 408; benefits/risks to ER section headings; monitoring rows to ER table lines 440–449; qualitative items to ER lines 453–458.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “plausible but unproven” carried verbatim from ER line 484 into at_a_glance.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Contraindication thresholds and time windows carried at full strength; “well established” is the ER’s own word (ER line 480).
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come only from ER lines 325–331; Key Interactions only from ER lines 307–321; no Benefit-/Risk-Modifying Factor content is surfaced.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT IDs or author names in the QRS; all named drugs (warfarin, apixaban, epoetin alfa, omeprazole, etc.) appear in ER lines 307–319.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions present.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Measured, trade-off-forward tone mirroring the ER conclusion.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Numeric targets and thresholds throughout; framing is neutral and enabling.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Content is descriptive; no imperatives.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Ranges are presented as targets drawn from the ER, not as instructions.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 No recommending or advising verbs.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the document body.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms used are load-bearing and taken from the ER; at_a_glance is fully plain.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Every card item is a stripped noun phrase; no elaborations.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed: no “you”/”your”.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Functional ranges and ferritin-titrated scheduling assume a proactive, self-managing reader.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Weekly/fortnightly induction schedules and repeat lab panels are presented without hedging on burden.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Ten-marker monitoring panel and genotype testing are beyond general-population framing.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 at_a_glance draws the exact line between established indications and the unproven general case.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 “Slowed skin and connective-tissue aging” — no “anti-aging” construction anywhere.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Clinical register throughout (myocardial infarction, vasovagal reaction, hyperferritinemia); benefit labels reproduce the ER’s own section headings verbatim.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All headings, gate heads and table headers byte-identical to the template; visible tier labels intact.
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 Every template variable present; the marker_#* and qualitative_item# repeat placeholders are expanded to marker_1–10 and qualitative_item_1–6.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 The website=”evidence_review”, website=”audit” and website=”full_review” spans and all CSS are unchanged from the template.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No ER section governed by this item is empty; the absent High benefit tier is governed by item 12.5, which mandates display:none rather than empty-state phrasing.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 All eight Key Interaction labels and all three Protocol labels reproduce the ER bold labels verbatim.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Time-to-effect labels (“Iron-overload induction”, “Blood pressure”, “Ferritin”) are the literal subjects of ER line 408.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 Character scan confirms no code points above U+2190; the ER’s tier emoji and “⚠️ Conflicted” markers were correctly dropped.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every card is at the minimum the other checklist items permit; the compact 9–9.5pt card typography and 2-column gate grid hold the sheet to one page.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Lines 2–14, immediately after the doctype.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening “—” line 3, closing “—” line 13; the preamble text sits on line 2.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment; no metadata value is echoed on the page.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:03" is quoted, correctly, because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4: periodic_phlebotomy_2026-0829-0219_Opus_ER.md.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 Line 5: 26.7.02, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 Line 6: 2026-0829-0446.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Line 7: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Single word, no version.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Line 8: Opus 5.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5” — nickname plus version, context-window qualifier correctly omitted.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Line 9 matches the file on disk exactly.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Confirmed across all nine keys.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Periodic Phlebotomy for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”; ampersand correctly encoded.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 417 matches ER frontmatter canonical_topic with & encoding.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 2026-0829-0446 → 08/29/2026.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 5”, matching the frontmatter.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header carries only the template’s title and subline; the ER’s “Also known as” line was not carried over.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses ER lines 480–484 into who it is established for and what it costs.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 54 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Established indications ← ER line 480; “plausible but unproven” ← line 484; the cost list ← line 484.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 “store too much iron”, “make too many red cells”, “oxygen-carrying capacity” replace hemochromatosis, polycythemia and VO2max.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial named.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No numbers of any kind.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Sourced from “Populations who should avoid Periodic Phlebotomy”, ER lines 323–331.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All seven ER bullets present, none added.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Seven <li> elements inside the span.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s “, where the removed fraction of blood volume becomes disproportionate” and the NYHA gloss are stripped; no trailing dash clauses remain.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “(110 lb)”, “within the preceding 6 months”, “within the preceding 3 years”, “NYHA Class III–IV”, and all g/dL and ng/mL thresholds preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation in its contraindication list.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The ER names seven such populations and the section is correspondingly populated.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Sourced from ER lines 307–321.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 All eight ER interaction bullets present; no overlap with the contraindication list.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Eight <li> elements inside the span.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s Severity / Consequence / Mitigation fields and the PMID-linked meta-analysis reference are all stripped; only label plus drug examples remain.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Named example drugs retained for every bullet that has them (warfarin/apixaban/clopidogrel/aspirin, epoetin alfa/darbepoetin/testosterone cypionate, omeprazole/pantoprazole, and the five iron-lowering supplements).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation in its interaction list.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The ER names eight interactions and the section is correspondingly populated.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Sourced from ER Therapeutic Protocol, lines 357–361.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 The ER’s three dosing/scheduling regimens — standard voluntary donation, ferritin-guided donation, iron-overload induction — are the first three bullets and the only ones that specify volume and interval.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies more than three actionable aspects; all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine cells populated; volumes, intervals and ferritin endpoints match ER lines 357, 359 and 361.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 ER line 408 names exactly three: iron-overload induction, blood pressure, and ferritin — all three are carried.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered organ-damage prevention (called “the strongest human clinical-endpoint evidence” at ER line 155), then the −16.6 mmHg blood-pressure effect, then ferritin as the titration surrogate.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies three distinct time-to-effect aspects; all three sets are used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 “Months to years”, “6 weeks” and “1 to 2 sessions” all trace to ER line 408; the ferritin sub reproduces “falls roughly 30 ng/mL per unit removed”.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides an explicit “Time to effect” bullet at line 408.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Sourced from ER lines 143–211.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each tier is a semicolon-separated list of the ER’s own benefit sub-headings; no Magnitude paragraphs or PMIDs carried.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses in any benefits item; the ER’s “⚠️ Conflicted” markers are also stripped.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 ER line 149 states no benefit reaches High; benefits_high carries style="display: none" and no empty-state text.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Sourced from ER lines 229–289.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present and populated.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each tier reproduces the ER’s risk sub-headings only; no prevalence figures, hemovigilance counts or PMIDs carried.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses in any risks item.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four risk tiers are populated in the ER, so no span needed hiding.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Sourced from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success table, lines 438–449.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All ten ER rows carried: ferritin, transferrin saturation, hemoglobin, hematocrit, serum iron/TIBC, hs-CRP, HFE genotype, ALT/AST, fasting insulin and glucose, seated blood pressure.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Reproduces the induction and maintenance cadences from ER line 436.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Sourced from the qualitative marker list at ER lines 451–458.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers present, in ER order.

Issues 29/08/2026 04:52

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.