Audit: QRS - Royal Jelly for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 31/07/2026 03:15 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 82
Failed 0
N/A 9
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All doses, markers, tiers, contraindications, and interactions trace to the ER.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 “small and inconsistent”, “single small studies”, “never been tested in people” mirror ER caution.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 “sometimes fatal allergic reactions” preserves ER’s “occasionally fatal”; contraindications kept absolute.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications, interactions, benefits, risks each drawn from matching ER sections.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT IDs, or brand names introduced; none present in QRS.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions added.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Objective, measured framing consistent with ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Data-driven and accessible throughout.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents information without prescribing.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directive advice; facts presented neutrally.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Doses and markers stated as facts, not recommendations.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain language with brief clinical labels only where needed.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact cells and lists.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No “you”/reader address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing suits proactive longevity audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Protocol, monitoring, and screening reflect a committed audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not general-population framing.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Weighting reflects proactive audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. Proper names that contain “anti-aging” are quoted verbatim. 🟢 Uses “Longevity”; no “anti-aging” phrasing.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Formal terminology; “blood sugar” mirrors ER’s own usage.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: card/section headings (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”); gate headings (“Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”); tier labels (“High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”); Monitoring column headers (“Marker”, “Target”, “Why”). 🟢 All fixed headings and labels present and unmodified.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the QRS. 🟢 Full variable set present (header, at_a_glance, actions, times, benefits, gates, risks, markers, cadence, qualitative).
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 No stray modifications.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No relevant ER source section is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Interaction/contraindication labels match ER wording.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels faithful to ER.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators; tiers use bold text labels.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to fit a single page.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is the first element after doctype (lines 2–14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 YAML delimited by — at lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; only “duration” quoted (contains colon).
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: royal_jelly_2026-0731-0154_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02 matches prompt version.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0731-0308.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus” is a single word.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the nickname and the model version number and no additional qualifier 🟢 “Opus 4.8” — nickname plus version, no qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: royal_jelly_2026-0731-0154_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Frontmatter clean and consistent.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”. The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Royal Jelly for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Royal Jelly for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 2026-0731 → 07/31/2026.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header carries only date and model subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Distills the Conclusion’s benefit/risk balance.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 57 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Menopause, oxidative stress, metabolic, single-study, longevity, allergy each trace to the ER.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 Uses plain terms (blood sugar, cholesterol, allergic reactions); no acronyms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No statistics or effect sizes.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Drawn from “Populations who should avoid it”.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 Allergy, asthma, anaphylaxis, hormone-sensitive cancers, pregnancy/breastfeeding, children all present.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, mechanistic rationale, attributions, citations, study details. No content after an em/en/hyphen dash. 🟢 Concise; no trailing dash clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved, kept as concise as possible. 🟢 “(precautionary)”, “moderate-to-severe”, “(unless medically supervised)” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>”) that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying the bare symbol. N/A ER contraindications use no ranking notation.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Contraindications are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Drawn from the interactions bullets.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Anticoagulants, BP meds, diabetes meds, bee products, BP/blood-sugar supplements listed.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, mechanistic rationale, attributions, citations, study details. No content after an em/en/hyphen dash. 🟢 Concise; no trailing dash clauses.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved, kept concise. 🟢 Drug/example classes preserved (warfarin; ACE inhibitors, CCBs; metformin, sulfonylureas, insulin; CoQ10, garlic, omega-3; berberine, cinnamon).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>”), normalize to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying the bare symbol. N/A ER interactions use no ranking notation.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty N/A Key interactions are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Dose, timing, formulation from Therapeutic Protocol.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Standard dose, timing, formulation.
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible. N/A Three distinct actions are present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All three action cells populated from the ER.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Menopausal, metabolic/inflammatory, premenstrual — all named in the ER’s time-to-effect bullet.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Menopausal (Medium) first, then metabolic/inflammatory, then premenstrual.
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible. N/A Three time-to-effect aspects are present.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All three time cells populated from the ER.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Tiers mirror ER Medium/Low/Speculative benefits.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Terse benefit descriptors only.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 “⚠️ Conflicted” and other qualifiers stripped.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high (absent in ER) set to display:none.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Tiers mirror ER risk headings.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four populated.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Terse risk descriptors only.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 “(Topical Use)”, “(Rare)” stripped.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. N/A All four risk tiers contain items.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Markers and cadence drawn from Monitoring Protocol.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 8 ER biomarkers present with targets and rationale.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence text matches ER (baseline, 8–12 wks, 6–12 mo).

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Drawn from the ER’s qualitative markers list.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 6 qualitative markers present.

Issues 31/07/2026 03:15

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.