Audit: QRS - Selegiline for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 28/09/2026 02:35 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 94
Passed 84
Failed 0
N/A 10
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 At-a-glance, protocol, time-to-effect, gates, tiers, biomarkers and cadence all trace to ER passages (Conclusion, Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, Key Interactions, Expected Benefits, Potential Risks, Monitoring).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Cautious ER phrasing preserved, e.g. “no human dose has been validated for longevity”, “caution only above oral 10 mg/day or patch 6 mg/24 h”, “caution at low oral doses”.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No claim strengthened or softened; ER severity classes (absolute/contraindicated/caution/monitor/avoid) carried over unchanged.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come from the ER contraindication/population lists, interactions from the interaction bullets, risks from Potential Risks; no modifying factor is relabelled.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, NCT IDs or brand names; “Life Extension Foundation”, PHQ-9 and MoCA appear in the ER for the same facts.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 Only attribution is the Life Extension Foundation dosing suggestion, as in the ER.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Neutral, evidence-first tone mirrors the ER.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directives; items stated as facts or severity classes.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address anywhere.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain wording; clinical terms retained only where they are ER labels or marker names.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Lede and protocol lead with longevity use and dosing.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Monitoring schedule and interaction screening presented in full.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Lede separates animal-only longevity signal from human evidence in disease populations.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “oral dose”, “transdermal patch”, “adverse” register; no colloquial route phrasing.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified:
• Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”
• Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”
• Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”
• Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why”
🟢 All fixed headings, gate heads, tier labels and table headers match the template.
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 template data-qrs-var spans present (marker_#/qualitative_item_# expanded to 8 and 6 rows).
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Website spans (evidence_review, audit, full_review) and footer unchanged.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section used is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels “Longevity low dose (Life Extension Foundation)”, “Single or split dosing”, “Time of day” are the ER bold labels verbatim.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢  
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji in the QRS.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every section condensed to key facts (tiers list names only, gate items stripped of rationale); list lengths are dictated by the ER contraindication, interaction and biomarker counts that 8.2/9.2/14.2 require in full.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment directly follows <!doctype html> (lines 2-14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢  
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢  
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 duration “00:00” quoted because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢  
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 26.9.28 matches QRS.md version.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 2026-0928-0210
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢  
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Opus
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢  
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Opus 5.5
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢  
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢  

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Selegiline for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢  
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 09/28/2026
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5.5
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢  

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens with “an inexpensive prescription medication for Parkinson’s disease and, as a transdermal patch, depression”.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Covers lifespan signal, lack of human testing, strongest human evidence, main risks and serious-reaction sources from the Conclusion.
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 68 words.
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢  
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms; “transdermal” kept as route term required by 2.15.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 5 contraindicated drug classes plus all 10 ER population entries represented.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 No trailing dash clauses or rationale.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 14-day/5-week windows, Child-Pugh C, creatinine clearance <30, ≥160/100 mmHg, ≥20 mmHg drop, 10 days, under 12 years preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A ER uses no ranking notation.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 Section populated; ER names contraindicated populations.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 10 non-contraindicated ER interaction bullets listed; contraindicated drug classes excluded.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug/supplement lists and dose thresholds preserved.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A ER uses no ranking notation.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 Section populated.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 From ER Therapeutic Protocol.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Longevity dose, dosing frequency and time of day.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER provides more than three actionable aspects.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢  

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Mood (patch), Parkinson’s symptoms, longevity from ER Practical Considerations.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 High-tier depression and Parkinson’s first, speculative longevity last.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three aspects available.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢  
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢  
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢  
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Tiers match ER High/Medium/Low/Speculative headings; names only.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers have items.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢  
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢  
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 All 17 ER risks listed in correct tiers; names only.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers have items.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢  
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 8 ER biomarkers with targets and rationale verbatim.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence matches ER Monitoring paragraph.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢  
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 6 ER qualitative markers listed.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:35

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:32

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained jargon in interaction label: Line 569 “Phenylethylamine and sympathomimetic supplements” drops the ER’s plain-language gloss “(adrenaline-like)”, leaving “sympathomimetic” unexplained.
  2. 2.15 — Lay route phrasing in lede: At-a-Glance (line 433) says “as a skin patch” where the ER uses the formal term “transdermal patch”.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:32

  1. 2.7 — Restored plain-language gloss: Changed the Key Interactions label “Phenylethylamine and sympathomimetic supplements” to the ER’s “Phenylethylamine and sympathomimetic (adrenaline-like) supplements”.
  2. 2.15 — Formal route terminology: Replaced “as a skin patch” with “as a transdermal patch” in the At-a-Glance text.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:28

  1. 8.5 — Post-selegiline washout window dropped: The Contraindications item at line 547 (“Within 14 days of stopping a contraindicated drug (5 weeks for fluoxetine)”) omits the ER’s 14-day window after stopping selegiline itself (Opioid analgesics and Other MAOIs bullets; Discontinuation “continue for 14 days after the last dose”), a time window that decides whether the opioid/MAOI gates apply.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:28

  1. 8.5 — Post-selegiline washout window restored: Changed the Contraindications item from “Within 14 days of stopping a contraindicated drug (5 weeks for fluoxetine)” to “… (5 weeks for fluoxetine) or of stopping selegiline”, per the ER’s opioid, MAOI and Discontinuation text.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:25

  1. 4.2 — Protocol labels re-cased: The ER bold labels “Single or split dosing” and “Time of day” appear in the QRS as “Single or Split Dosing” (line 455) and “Time of Day” (line 466), not verbatim.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:25

  1. 4.2 — Protocol labels restored verbatim: Changed “Single or Split Dosing” to “Single or split dosing” and “Time of Day” to “Time of day” to match the ER bold labels.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:21

  1. 7.5 — Technical term in lede: The At-a-Glance (line 433) uses “transdermal patch”, a clinical-register term a non-specialist would not use unprompted; the plain-language “skin patch” should be used.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:21

  1. 7.5 — Technical term in lede: Replaced “transdermal patch” with the plain-language “skin patch” in the At-a-Glance (line 433).

Issues 28/09/2026 02:18

  1. 4.2 / 4.3 — Protocol label not verbatim: action_1_label (line 444) reads “Longevity Low Dose” instead of the ER bold label “Longevity low dose (Life Extension Foundation)” from the Therapeutic Protocol section, dropping the parenthetical attribution.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:18

  1. 4.2 / 4.3 — Protocol label not verbatim: Changed action_1_label from “Longevity Low Dose” to the ER bold label “Longevity low dose (Life Extension Foundation)”, and reworded action_1_sub to “Suggested by the Foundation; …” so the attribution isn’t repeated.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:15

  1. 2.7 — Pharmacology jargon in protocol: action_2_sub (line 461) reads “Irreversible inhibition allows intermittent dosing”, using a technical pharmacology term where plain wording (permanent enzyme blocking, as used in the lede) is available.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:15

  1. 2.7 — Plain wording in protocol: Changed action_2_sub from “Irreversible inhibition allows intermittent dosing” to “Permanent enzyme blocking allows intermittent dosing”.

Issues 28/09/2026 02:11

  1. 2.15 — Lay phrasing for route: The At-a-Glance (line 433) replaces the ER’s “transdermal patch” with the lay route-of-administration phrase “skin patch”.

Fixes 28/09/2026 02:11

  1. 2.15 — Lay phrasing for route: Changed “as a skin patch” to “as a transdermal patch” in the At-a-Glance, matching the ER wording.