Audit: QRS - Sh-Polypeptide-9 for Hair Regrowth

Audit conducted on 28/06/2026 01:21 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 91
Failed 0
N/A 0
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All QRS content traces to the ER (Protocol, Benefits, Risks, Interactions, Monitoring, Conclusion).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 QRS preserves “Theoretical concern”, “promising but unproven”, “uncertain long-term” framing.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 Pregnancy/lactation and psoriasis kept as STOP contraindications, not softened.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Categories map faithfully ER→QRS; no cross-category relabeling.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 QRS carries no PMIDs, citations, expert names, NCTs, or brand names.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions introduced.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Matches the ER’s measured, evidence-aware tone.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Maintained throughout.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents information without prescribing.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No advisory language.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Information-presenting voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain language used; technical terms glossed or avoided.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact card/cell format.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing fits this audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Consistent with framing.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not general-population framed.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Weighting reflects proactive audience.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. Proper names that contain “anti-aging” are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” phrasing present.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 “injection”, “serum”, “scalp”; no colloquialisms.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card/section headings (“Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”); Gate headings (“Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”); Tier labels (“High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”); Monitoring column headers (“Marker”, “Target”, “Why”). 🟢 All fixed headings/labels present and unmodified.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All template var spans present.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Untouched spans unchanged.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. 🟢 No empty sections required empty-state phrasing; absent tiers hidden via display:none per 12.5/13.5.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Labels taken verbatim from ER headings.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels faithful to ER.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). 🟢 No emoji indicators (grep confirmed).
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to one-page budget.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Comment is first element (lines 2–14).
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. 🟢 ”—” delimiters at lines 3 and 13.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside HTML comment; not rendered.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Values trimmed; only “duration” quoted (contains colon).
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: sh_polypeptide_9_hair_2026-0628-0004_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0628-0004
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. 🟢 “Opus” — single word.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the nickname and the model version number and no additional qualifier. 🟢 “Opus 4.8” — nickname + version.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename: sh_polypeptide_9_hair_2026-0628-0004_Opus_QRS.html
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Consistent and clean.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”. The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Sh-Polypeptide-9 for Hair Regrowth - Quick Reference Sheet”; no entities required.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Sh-Polypeptide-9 for Hair Regrowth”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 2026-0628 → 06/28/2026.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header carries only the permitted fields.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion faithfully.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 48 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause traces to the Conclusion (biology sound, blends, seller conflict, unproven add-on).
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 “blood-vessel-growth signal”, “add-on” — plain language.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial citations.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No statistics.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from “Populations who should avoid it” / “Population thresholds”.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 Psoriasis, scalp cancer, sunburn/UV, pregnancy/lactation, systemic anti-VEGF therapy.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is its own <li>.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, elaborations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details, or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise; no trailing clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept concise. 🟢 “active scalp plaques”, “recent high-UV exposure” retained.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>”) that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 No ranking notation present; items already plain.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty 🟢 Stop items are present; section populated.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Derived from OTC/additive interaction bullets.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Anti-VEGF therapy excluded (it is a contraindication); irritants/acids and angiogenic actives retained.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Each item is its own <li>.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, rationale, attributions, citations, study details, or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise; no trailing clauses.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved, kept concise. 🟢 “(copper peptides / GHK-Cu, procyanidins, topical minoxidil)” preserved.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens that depends on an explanatory phrase, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 No ranking notation present; list already plain.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty 🟢 Caution items present; section populated.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Derived from Therapeutic Protocol bullets.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Topical serum, intradermal injection, dosing pattern.
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and made invisible. 🟢 Three aspects available; all sets used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All cells populated from ER (once/twice daily; every 2–3 weeks; repeated low-dose).

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Earliest effect, blend-study assessment, full reassessment.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered earliest → assessment → reassessment, consistent with ER emphasis.
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and made invisible. 🟢 Three aspects available; all sets used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 3–6 months, 3–4 months, 6 months+ — all ER-sourced.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel 🟢 ER provides time-to-effect data; section retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Derived from Medium/Low/Speculative benefit tiers.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four variables present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, or mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Concise key facts only.
12.4 Parenthetical content — effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 “(Anagen Support)” stripped from medium benefit.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high set to display:none (ER has no High tier).

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Derived from Low/Speculative risk tiers.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four variables present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, elaborations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, study details, or mechanistic explanations. 🟢 Concise key facts only.
13.4 Parenthetical content — frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried into risk items.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high and risks_medium set to display:none (ER has no High/Medium tiers).

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol table.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 Ferritin, TSH, Vitamin D (25-OH), Zinc — all four listed.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Baseline, ~3 months, 6 months, then every 6 months.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from the ER qualitative-markers list.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All four qualitative markers (shedding, regrowth, pull test, density) listed.

Issues 28/06/2026 01:21

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 28/06/2026 01:17

  1. 12.4 — Parenthetical not stripped: benefits_medium (line 525) retains the parenthetical “(anagen support)”; item 12.4 requires parenthetical content to be stripped, not preserved.

Fixes 28/06/2026 01:17

  1. 12.4 — Parenthetical not stripped: Removed the parenthetical “(anagen support)” from benefits_medium, changing “Increased perifollicular blood supply (anagen support)” to “Increased perifollicular blood supply”.