Audit: QRS - Streptococcus thermophilus for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 11/01/2026 06:52 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 97
Passed 89
Failed 0
N/A 8
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Lede, gates, protocol, time-to-effect, tiers and monitoring each trace to ER passages (Conclusion, Key Interactions & Contraindications, Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, Monitoring table).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Lede keeps “appear low” and “less certain” from the ER Conclusion; action_3_sub keeps “no time-of-day data exist for other outcomes”.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No ER claim is strengthened or softened; the lede keeps “mostly from related products”.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come from “Populations who should avoid”; documented and theoretical interactions stay in their ER groups.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 Only YIT 2001, FDA, EU, APACHE II, Imrie and Lactobacillus appear, each in the ER for the same fact.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢  
2.2 The tone of the QRS is expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢  
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses the reader directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms used (myelosuppressive, APACHE II, pouchitis) are parts of ER labels carried verbatim.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.11 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢  
2.13 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording.
2.14 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 No colloquial route or adverse-event wording.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified:
* Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”
* Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”
* Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”
* Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why”
🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and column headers unchanged (lines 446, 483, 525, 545, 557, 588, 607, 611-613, 671).
3.2 Every element carrying a data-qrs-var attribute in [qrs_template] is present in the QRS with the same name 🟢 Diff against the template shows every data-qrs-var name present; marker_# and qualitative_item_# expanded to 1..4 and 1..6.
3.3 Everything outside the data-qrs-var spans — markup, text, styles, comments — is as in the template; spans that no checklist item addresses are left unchanged as well 🟢 Diff against the template shows changes only inside data-qrs-var spans, hidden-tier style attributes and the metadata values.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 An empty ER section never produces visible empty-state text in the QRS: the corresponding region is hidden or left empty. Phrases such as “None documented in human trials to date” or “Not formally studied” appear only where the ER uses them for a fact the QRS carries over. 🟢 No empty-state phrases; empty tiers hidden (lines 527, 590, 593).
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢  
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢  
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. It fails this item only for one of four things: a trailing clause after a dash, an optional gloss, an example list left untrimmed, or a repetition. Nothing else is cut to fit. 🟢 No trailing dash clauses, optional glosses, untrimmed example lists or repetitions.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment at line 2, directly after <!doctype html>.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢  
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢  
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢  
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: streptococcus_thermophilus_2026-1101-0259_Opus_ER.md (line 4).
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.10.25 matches QRS.md.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-1101-0642.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢  
5.9 The nickname of the AI is the full name without the version number, with all remaining words joined by hyphens (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini-Flash, GPT); when the full name has no version number or is “Unknown”, the nickname equals the full name 🟢  
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢  
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the model name (the word or words directly before the version number, leaving out the first if there is more than one, e.g., Claude Opus 5.5 → Opus 5.5), the model version number and the variant (if any) as stated in the system prompt or developer instructions of the creating model, with every word capitalized and without product, effort or pricing names (e.g., Opus X.Y, Sonnet X.Y, Grok X.Y, Gemini X.Y Flash, GPT X.Y), the model name alone when the system prompt or developer instructions name a model without a version number (e.g., Grok), or “Unknown” when neither the system prompt nor the developer instructions of the creating model name a model 🟢  
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢  

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Streptococcus thermophilus for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet” (line 21).
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 423 matches ER canonical_topic with &.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 11/01/2026 from 2026-1101-0642.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5.5.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢  

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens “Streptococcus thermophilus is a yogurt bacterium sold as a probiotic supplement for digestion.”
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢  
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 Script count: 70 words.
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢  
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢  
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All five ER “Populations who should avoid” items listed (lines 548-552).
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 “per the FDA”, inference clauses and citations stripped.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Thresholds kept for neutropenia and pancreatitis (lines 550-551); “outside a regulated investigational protocol” kept.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 ER uses no ranking notation in the contraindication items.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢  
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty: five contraindications are listed.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
9.2 [caution_items] represent the ER’s documented interactions — the items under its “Documented interactions:” label — excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications and any entry phrased as no interaction found 🟢 Fluoroquinolone and lactose items listed; the 5-aminosalicylate entry (“no interaction found”) is correctly excluded.
9.3 [caution_theoretical_items] represent the ER’s theoretical interactions — the items under its “Theoretical interactions (inferred from mechanism, not studied in humans):” label 🟢 All seven theoretical items listed (lines 571-577).
9.4 The ER placeholder “None identified” is never an item: it means that group is empty 🟢  
9.5 Individual [caution_items] and [caution_theoretical_items] are formatted as <li></li>. The template’s bold “Theoretical (inferred from mechanism)” sub-heading is the only marker of the second list’s status: no item carries “(theoretical)”, “inferred from” or a mechanism clause 🟢  
9.6 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
9.7 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug lists kept (ciprofloxacin, ofloxacin; cyclophosphamide, tacrolimus; omeprazole, esomeprazole; amlodipine, lisinopril; beetroot nitrate, garlic extract; inulin, Lactobacillus products).
9.8 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 ER uses no ranking notation in the interaction items.
9.9 If the ER’s theoretical group is empty, the whole Theoretical block — the caution_theoretical span with its sub-heading and list — is hidden with style="display:none", not removed: its spans stay in place, empty. N/A ER theoretical group is not empty (seven items), so the block is shown.
9.10 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢  
9.11 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on, and the Theoretical block is hidden per 9.9. E.g. N/A Section is not empty: two documented and seven theoretical interactions are listed.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Therapeutic Protocol section 🟢  
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from that section 🟢 Food-based yogurt intake, strain-specific fermented milk (the Medium-tier benefit) and lactose-meal timing for the most replicated effect.
10.3 If fewer than three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER, the unused sets are left empty and hidden with style="display:none", not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER Therapeutic Protocol names more than three actionable aspects; all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from that section. 🟢 Labels verbatim from ER bold labels; values and subs drawn from the same bullets (lines 450-478).

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Blood pressure 12 weeks, lactose digestion same meal, ulcerative colitis by 6 weeks, per ER Practical Considerations.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Blood pressure (Medium tier) first, then the two Low-tier items.
11.3 If fewer than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER, the unused sets are left empty and hidden with style="display:none", not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER Practical Considerations names three time-to-effect aspects; all three sets are used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢  
11.5 If the ER provides no information on time to effect at all, the whole Time to effect block (its subhead and all three sets) is hidden with style="display:none", not removed: its spans stay in place, empty. N/A ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢  
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 High hidden; Medium, Low and Speculative populated with ER tier headings.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢  
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
12.5 If a tier (high, medium, low, speculative) has no items, its span is hidden with style="display:none", not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high hidden with style=”display:none” (line 527).

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢  
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 High and Medium hidden; Low and Speculative populated with ER tier headings.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢  
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
13.5 If a tier (high, medium, low, speculative) has no items, its span is hidden with style="display:none", not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high and risks_medium hidden (lines 590, 593).

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section 🟢  
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from that section are listed, one table row per marker; the template’s # row is the pattern, repeated with # replaced by 1, 2, 3 … in the data-qrs-var names 🟢 Four rows: blood pressure, breath test, fecal calprotectin, absolute neutrophil count.
14.3 [marker_#name] is the marker, [marker#target] its target value or range as given in the ER, [marker#_why] its purpose in a few words; a target the ER does not give is written “Not specified in the ER” 🟢 Targets match the ER table’s Optimal Functional Range column.
14.4 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from that section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence carries the ER’s ongoing-monitoring schedule (line 665).
14.5 If the ER names no measurable biomarker, the table is hidden with style="display:none" and the single # row is left as in the template N/A ER names four measurable biomarkers.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section 🟢  
15.2 All subjective/qualitative markers from that section are listed, one <li> per marker; the template’s # item is the pattern, repeated with # replaced by 1, 2, 3 … 🟢 Six items verbatim from the ER list.
15.3 If the ER names no qualitative marker, the card’s list is hidden with style="display:none" and the single # item is left as in the template N/A ER names six qualitative markers.

Issues 11/01/2026 06:52

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 11/01/2026 06:47

  1. 7.2 — Lede omits product quality: At a Glance (line 439) leaves out the Conclusion’s execution-relevant point that heat-treated yogurts and low-count supplements deliver little live bacteria, and narrows the Conclusion’s “bloodstream infection and harm in critical illness” to “serious infection concerns”.

Fixes 11/01/2026 06:47

  1. 7.2 — Lede omits product quality: Added “Heat-treated yogurts deliver little live bacteria.” to At a Glance and replaced “serious infection concerns” with “serious concerns”, dropping “mostly brief bloating” and “also” to stay within 70 words.

Issues 11/01/2026 06:45

  1. 1.2 / 1.3 — Lede drops evidence hedge: The at_a_glance sentence at line 439 says “serious infection concerns apply to premature infants and severely ill or immune-suppressed people” but omits the ER Conclusion’s qualifier (ER line 455) that these concerns “come mostly from related products”, which strengthens the claim for S. thermophilus itself.

Fixes 11/01/2026 06:45

  1. 1.2 / 1.3 — Lede evidence hedge restored: Changed the at_a_glance risk clause from “serious infection concerns apply to premature infants…” to “serious infection concerns, mostly from related products, involve premature infants…”; shortened the opening to “a yogurt bacterium also sold as a probiotic supplement for digestion” to stay within 70 words.