Audit: QRS - Topical Naringenin for Hair Regrowth

Audit conducted on 25/09/2026 03:44 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 94
Passed 87
Failed 0
N/A 7
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All lede, protocol, time, benefit, risk, gate, and monitoring content traces to ER passages (Conclusion, Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, Risk Mitigation, Monitoring)
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Cautious phrasing preserved: “no human protocol has been tested”, “an extrapolation, not a validated dose”, “no time-of-day data exist”, “No established target”
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No claim strengthened or softened; tiers and Caution/Monitor levels match ER
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come from ER “Populations who should avoid”; interactions from ER interaction bullets; no modifying factors relabeled
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, citations, NCT IDs, expert or brand names in QRS
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No new attributions

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments  
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Cautious, evidence-first tone mirrors ER  
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢    
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢    
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢    
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢    
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢    
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms (CYP3A4, trichoscopy, TSH) appear only as ER bold labels or marker names that must be kept verbatim  
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢    
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢    
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢    
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢    
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢    
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Lede weighs unproven benefit against low risk for a self-compounding audience  
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording  
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Route stated as “applied to the scalp”; “oral” used for systemic route; no colloquial terms  

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels, and column headers unchanged
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All template data-qrs-var spans present
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Head/CSS identical to template apart from page_title; website spans and footer unchanged

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” 🟢 ER empty tiers handled via display:none per 12.5/13.5; no surfaced empty ER section needing phrasing
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels (“Tested regimen”, “Human translation (untested)”, “Time of day”), interaction labels, and qualitative labels are ER bold labels verbatim
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Time-to-effect labels drawn from ER wording (“visible change”, “minimum fair trial”, mice regrowth)
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji indicators
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed to per-section budget; no overflow structure

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments  
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢    
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢    
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢    
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration is quoted, and its value contains a colon  
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢    
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 26.9.25 matches QRS.md  
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 2026-0925-0336  
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢    
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Opus  
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢    
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Opus 5.5  
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢    
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢    

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments  
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Topical Naringenin for Hair Regrowth - Quick Reference Sheet”  
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢    
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 09/25/2026  
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5.5  
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢    

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments  
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens “Naringenin, a natural citrus compound applied to the scalp … to support hair regrowth”  
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢    
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 68 words  
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢    
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢    
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢    
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢    

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments  
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢    
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All 5 ER populations listed  
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢    
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢    
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “(no safety data)”, “(no data)”, “within 48 hours of microneedling” preserved  
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A ER uses no ranking notation  
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 Section populated; ER names populations to avoid  
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty  

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments  
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢    
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Microneedling interaction omitted because it is already a Contraindication (documented in HTML comment)  
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢    
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢    
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug and product lists preserved  
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A ER uses no ranking notation  
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 Section populated; ER names interactions  
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty  

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments  
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢    
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Tested regimen, human translation, and time of day  
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER provides at least three actionable aspects  
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢    

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments  
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Visible change 3–6 months, minimum fair trial 6 months, mouse regrowth within 21 days  
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢    
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER provides three time-to-effect aspects  
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢    
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A ER provides time-to-effect information  

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments  
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢    
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢    
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 ER “Not Central” markers and study details stripped  
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢    
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 High, Medium, Low spans set to display: none  

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments  
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢    
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢    
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Magnitudes and “Conflicted” marker stripped  
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢    
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 High and Medium spans set to display: none  

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments  
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢    
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 6 ER table biomarkers listed  
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢    

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments  
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢    
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 4 ER qualitative markers listed  

Issues 25/09/2026 03:44

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 25/09/2026 03:41

  1. 2.5 — Imperative guidance in marker target: marker_5_target (line 648) reads “No established target; track change from own baseline”, an instruction (“track”) rather than presented information.

Fixes 25/09/2026 03:41

  1. 2.5 — Imperative marker target reworded: Changed marker_5_target from “No established target; track change from own baseline” to “No established target; change from individual baseline”, removing the directive.

Issues 25/09/2026 03:38

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained specialist term: Qualitative Assessment item 1 (QRS line 678) uses “pull-test counts” without the plain-language explanation given in the ER (“hairs released by a gentle tug”, ER line 340).

Fixes 25/09/2026 03:38

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained specialist term: Added the ER’s plain-language explanation to Qualitative Assessment item 1, changing “pull-test counts” to “pull-test counts (hairs released by a gentle tug)”.