Audit: QRS - Trekrezan for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 01/10/2026 02:54 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items	Count
Total	94
Passed	88
Failed	0
N/A	6
Pass Rate	100.00%

• Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
• Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
• N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

---

1. General Rules

#	Description	Result	Comments
1.1	Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER.	🟢	All lede, protocol, time, gate, tier, monitoring and qualitative content traced to ER Conclusion, Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, Key Interactions & Contraindications, Expected Benefits, Potential Risks and Monitoring sections
1.2	Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing.	🟢	“(theoretical)” qualifiers and “All theoretical; Russian labeling reports no known undesirable drug interactions” preserved; time_1_sub keeps “Labeled courses assume effects within days”
1.3	The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”).	🟢	Contraindications kept as labeled; immunosuppressants kept as “Relative contraindication”; interaction severities (Caution/Monitor) unchanged
1.4	The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc.	🟢	Modifying factors not surfaced as cautions or side effects; immunosuppressant item is a relative contraindication in the ER
1.5	PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact.	🟢	No PubMed IDs, citations, NCT IDs or brand names in the QRS
1.6	The QRS does not introduce new attributions.	🟢

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

#	Description	Result	Comments
2.1	The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing.	🟢	Measured, evidence-qualified tone mirrors the ER Conclusion
2.2	The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging	🟢
2.3	The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor	🟢
2.4	The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice	🟢
2.5	The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising”	🟢
2.6	The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance	🟢	Only the fixed template footer uses imperative wording
2.7	The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon	🟢	Lab and chemical terms are the ER labels required verbatim by 4.2/14.x
2.8	Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner	🟢
2.9	It DOES NOT address the reader directly	🟢
2.10	The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review.	🟢
2.11	The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort.	🟢
2.12	The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort.	🟢
2.13	Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience.	🟢
2.14	The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim.	🟢	No “anti-aging” wording
2.15	The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt.	🟢	Lede uses “oral drug”; protocol uses “oral dose”, “tablets”

3. Template Integrity

#	Description	Result	Comments
3.1	The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: • Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment” • Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions” • Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative” • Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why”	🟢	All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and table headers unchanged
3.2	All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS.	🟢	All template data-qrs-var spans present (marker_# / qualitative_item_# expanded to 1–6)
3.3	Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged	🟢	website spans (evidence_review, audit, full_review) and other unaddressed elements unchanged

4. Formatting

#	Description	Result	Comments
4.1	When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied”	🟢	Only the empty High/Medium tiers are empty in the ER; they are hidden per 12.5/13.5 rather than filled
4.2	Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label.	🟢	Protocol labels and interaction labels match ER bold labels verbatim
4.3	Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented.	🟢
4.4	The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels.	🟢	No emoji indicators
4.5	The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page.	🟢	Content volume condensed to a single-page budget

5. Metadata

#	Description	Result	Comments
5.1	The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content.	🟢	Metadata comment directly follows <!doctype html> (line 2)
5.2	Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML.	🟢	Lines 3 and 13
5.3	The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet.	🟢
5.4	All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting.	🟢	Only duration is quoted (value contains a colon)
5.5	The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]”	🟢	er_filename: trekrezan_2026-1001-0005_Opus_ER.md
5.6	Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]”	🟢	qrs_prompt_version: 26.9.29 matches QRS.md
5.7	Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430)	🟢	qrs_creation_date: 2026-1001-0238
5.8	The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]”	🟢	qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9	The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT)	🟢
5.10	The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]”	🟢	qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5.5
5.11	The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4)	🟢
5.12	The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]”	🟢	qrs_filename: trekrezan_2026-1001-0005_Opus_QRS.html
5.13	All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting.	🟢

6. Page Title & Header

#	Description	Result	Comments
6.1	[page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., & for &)	🟢	“Trekrezan for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”
6.2	[header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., & for &)	🟢	“Trekrezan for Health & Longevity”
6.3	[header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY]	🟢	10/01/2026
6.4	[header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]	🟢	Opus 5.5
6.5	No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker.	🟢

7. At-A-Glance Section

#	Description	Result	Comments
7.1	[at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence	🟢	Opens “Trekrezan, an inexpensive synthetic oral drug sold over the counter in Russia … to raise resistance to stress and support immunity”
7.2	[at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section	🟢
7.3	[at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words	🟢	69 words
7.4	Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER.	🟢
7.5	It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead	🟢
7.6	It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values)	🟢
7.7	It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results	🟢

8. Contraindications

#	Description	Result	Comments
8.1	The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section	🟢
8.2	[stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER	🟢	Six ER avoidance populations plus the immunosuppressant relative contraindication
8.3	Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li>	🟢
8.4	Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact.	🟢
8.5	Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely).	🟢	“(labeled contraindication)” and “(theoretical)” retained
8.6	When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol.	N/A	No ranking notation in the ER
8.7	The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision.	🟢	Section populated
8.8	If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g.	N/A	Section not empty

9. Key Interactions

#	Description	Result	Comments
9.1	The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section	🟢
9.2	[caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications	🟢	Immunosuppressants excluded (listed as contraindication)
9.3	Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li>	🟢
9.4	Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact.	🟢
9.5	Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely).	🟢	Example drug/supplement lists preserved
9.6	When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol.	N/A	No ranking notation in the ER
9.7	The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used.	🟢	Section populated
9.8	If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g.	N/A	Section not empty

10. Protocol

#	Description	Result	Comments
10.1	The section is derived from the ER Protocol section	🟢
10.2	The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section	🟢	Stress/performance course, prevention course, single pre-exposure dose
10.3	If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing.	N/A	ER provides at least three actionable aspects
10.4	All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section.	🟢

11. Time to Effect

#	Description	Result	Comments
11.1	The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER	🟢	ER Practical Considerations gives two time-to-effect aspects; both used
11.2	The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit	🟢
11.3	If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing.	🟢	time_3 cell empty and hidden (line 503)
11.4	All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER.	🟢
11.5	If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel	N/A	ER provides time-to-effect information

12. Benefits

#	Description	Result	Comments
12.1	The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section	🟢
12.2	Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative]	🟢
12.3	Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact.	🟢
12.4	Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved.	🟢
12.5	If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing.	🟢	benefits_high and benefits_medium set to display: none

13. Risks

#	Description	Result	Comments
13.1	The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section	🟢
13.2	Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative]	🟢
13.3	Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact.	🟢
13.4	Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved.	🟢
13.5	If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing.	🟢	risks_high and risks_medium set to display: none

14. Monitoring

#	Description	Result	Comments
14.1	The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section	🟢
14.2	All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed	🟢	All six ER biomarkers listed with ER targets
14.3	[monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty.	🟢	Cadence matches ER Ongoing monitoring

15. Qualitative Assessment

#	Description	Result	Comments
15.1	The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section	🟢
15.2	All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed	🟢	All six ER qualitative markers listed

Issues 01/10/2026 02:54

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 01/10/2026 02:50

1. 7.2 — Lede not execution-oriented: The at_a_glance text (line 433) summarizes only the evidence and safety verdict and omits the Conclusion’s execution-relevant characterization “an inexpensive, short-course compound” (ER line 383).

Fixes 01/10/2026 02:50

1. 7.2 — Lede made execution-oriented: Added the Conclusion’s “inexpensive” and “in short courses” characterization to the at_a_glance opening (“Trekrezan, an inexpensive synthetic oral drug sold over the counter in Russia in short courses…”), keeping it at 69 words.

Issues 01/10/2026 02:46

1. 1.2 — Labeling attribution dropped: The last Key Interactions item (QRS line 559) states “no known undesirable drug interactions” as a bare fact, whereas ER line 257 attributes it to what “Russian labeling reports”.
2. 1.3 / 2.4 / 2.5 — Imperative cadence instruction: The monitoring cadence (QRS line 664) says “repeat at the end of the first course …”, turning the ER’s descriptive “The panel is typically repeated” (ER line 344) into an instruction and dropping “typically”.

Fixes 01/10/2026 02:46

1. 1.2 — Labeling attribution restored: Changed the last Key Interactions item from “All theoretical; no known undesirable drug interactions” to “All theoretical; Russian labeling reports no known undesirable drug interactions”.
2. 1.3 / 2.4 / 2.5 — Cadence made descriptive: Replaced “repeat at the end of the first course” with “typically repeated at the end of the first course” in the monitoring cadence, matching the ER wording.

Issues 01/10/2026 02:44

1. 4.3 — Time-to-effect label abbreviated: time_1_label (line 483) “Respiratory viral infections” shortens the ER benefit heading “Resistance to Acute Respiratory Viral Infections” (ER line 137) instead of using it verbatim.
2. 8.4 — Rationale kept in stop item: The contraindication at line 538 “Pregnant or breastfeeding women (labeled contraindication; no safety data)” retains the explanatory rationale “no safety data”.

Fixes 01/10/2026 02:44

1. 4.3 — Time-to-effect label made verbatim: Changed time_1_label from “Respiratory viral infections” to “Resistance to acute respiratory viral infections”, matching the ER benefit heading.
2. 8.4 — Removed rationale from stop item: Changed “Pregnant or breastfeeding women (labeled contraindication; no safety data)” to “Pregnant or breastfeeding women (labeled contraindication)”.

Issues 01/10/2026 02:40

1. 2.4 / 2.5 — Unattributed medical-review instruction: time_1_sub (line 489) reads “medical review if respiratory symptoms have not improved after 3 days” in the sheet’s own voice; the ER (line 325) attributes this to labeling (“labeling calls for medical review”).
2. 2.7 — Unexplained jargon term: action_3_sub (line 472) uses “meteoadaptogen”, a specialist term the ER glosses as “an aid to weather and climate adaptation” (ER line 112).
3. 9.4 — Attribution in caution item: The last caution item (line 559) includes the attribution “Russian labeling reports no known undesirable drug interactions” rather than just the key fact.

Fixes 01/10/2026 02:40

1. 2.4 / 2.5 — Attributed medical-review instruction: In time_1_sub, changed “medical review if respiratory symptoms…” to “labeling calls for medical review if respiratory symptoms…”, matching ER line 325.
2. 2.7 — Replaced jargon term: In action_3_sub, replaced acute “meteoadaptogen” use with “acute use as a weather and climate adaptation aid”, using the ER’s own gloss.
3. 9.4 — Removed attribution from caution item: Changed the last caution item from “All theoretical; Russian labeling reports no known undesirable drug interactions” to “All theoretical; no known undesirable drug interactions”.