Audit: QRS - Vitamin D for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 11/08/2026 12:17 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 83
Failed 0
N/A 10
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Protocol cells trace to ER lines 407/409/417, time-to-effect to lines 168/421/473, benefit and risk tiers to the ER Expected Benefits and Potential Risks & Side Effects headings, gates to lines 340–379, monitoring to the ER table at lines 511–518 and cadence at line 507.
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 No mapped ER section is empty and no cautious hedge is dropped; at-a-glance mirrors the ER Conclusion wording (“have not shown fewer fractures, less cancer, or longer life”).
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 “pushing levels higher raises calcium without further gain” preserves the ER’s “offering nothing further”; contraindication qualifiers (“without nephrology supervision”, “unless urinary calcium is monitored”) are carried intact.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Contraindications come only from “Populations who should avoid Vitamin D”; Key Interactions only from the ER interaction bullets; no Benefit- or Risk-Modifying Factor appears in a gate.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 The QRS contains no PMIDs, citations, expert names, NCT identifiers, or brand names.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions of any kind are present.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Neutral, evidence-first register carried over from the ER, including the ER’s own split framing of low versus adequate baseline levels.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Quantified targets and thresholds throughout, presented without alarmism or promotion.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Doses and targets are stated as observed practice, not issued as instructions.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No imperatives; no “should”, “must”, “recommend”, “advise”, or “consider” anywhere in the rendered text.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 All cells are declarative statements of ER content.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns occur in the file.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms appear only where they are the fact itself (marker names, drug classes, contraindication states); the at-a-glance is jargon-free.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Every gate, tier, and table cell is a bare fact with the ER’s explanations, magnitudes, and mechanisms stripped.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 Confirmed by full-text search for “you”/”your”/”yours”: no matches.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Content assumes willingness to test 25(OH)D, calcium, PTH, and urinary calcium and to titrate a dose.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 An eight-marker monitoring panel with a retest cadence assumes exactly this audience.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 No population-level messaging or simplified consumer advice.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 The at-a-glance foregrounds the baseline-level split and the U-shaped risk curve, which is the decision-relevant distinction for an optimizing reader.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 The string “anti-aging” does not occur; the title uses “Health & Longevity”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 Clinical register throughout (“hypercalcemia”, “nephrolithiasis”, “albumin-corrected”); the at-a-glance phrase “broken bones” is the ER Conclusion’s own wording carried verbatim (ER line 557).

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All headings, gate titles, tier labels, and the Marker/Target/Why column headers match [qrs_template] character for character.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 template variable names are present; the repeatable marker_#_* and qualitative_item_# spans are instantiated as marker_1..8_* and qualitative_item_1..6.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 The three <span website="..."> elements (evidence_review, audit, full_review) and all surrounding markup are byte-identical to the template.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No ER section mapped into the QRS is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 “Standard maintenance dose”, “Correcting documented deficiency”, and “Form” are the ER Therapeutic Protocol bold labels verbatim (ER lines 407, 409, 417).
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Time-to-effect labels use the ER’s own terms from line 473 (“non-skeletal endpoints”, “Blood levels”, deficiency symptoms); marker names are the ER biomarker-table names verbatim.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 Full-file scan of the emoji code ranges returns no matches; the ER’s tier emoji are not carried over.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Single sheet, no second-page content; every section is condensed from the ER (magnitudes, mechanisms, and the monitoring table’s Context/Notes column all dropped), 706 rendered words total.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Lines 2–14, immediately after <!doctype html> on line 1.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening --- at line 3, closing --- at line 13; the descriptive text on line 2 precedes the block.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Enclosed in an HTML comment; no metadata value is repeated in the rendered body.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:03" is quoted, correctly so because it contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4: er_filename: vitamin_d_2026-0811-0953_Opus_ER.md.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 Line 5: qrs_prompt_version: 26.7.02, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 Line 6: qrs_creation_date: 2026-0811-1204.
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Line 7: qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 “Opus” — single word, no version.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Line 8: qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5.
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 “Opus 5” — nickname plus version, no qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Line 9 matches the file on disk: vitamin_d_2026-0811-0953_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 All nine values are trimmed; quoting is used only where YAML requires it.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 22: “Vitamin D for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”, matching ER canonical_topic with the ampersand encoded.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 417: “Vitamin D for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 Line 421: “08/11/2026”, the MM/DD/YYYY form of 2026-0811-1204.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Line 425: “Opus 5”.
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header contains only the title and the template subline; the ER’s “Also known as” line is not carried over.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses ER Conclusion lines 553 and 557 into the deficient/adequate split plus the dosing-pattern and ceiling caveats.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 56 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Bone-disease repair → ER line 553; null trials in adequate adults → line 553; tolerability and bolus harm → line 557; “without further gain” → line 557.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms; “blood levels”, “bone disease”, “calcium”, “broken bones” are all lay terms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial name, year, or sample size appears.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No ratios, confidence intervals, or percentages.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All six items come from “Populations who should avoid Vitamin D” (ER lines 374–379).
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All six ER contraindications are present, in ER order, with none added.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Six <li> elements inside the stop_items span (lines 542–547).
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 The ER’s trailing rationale “where extrarenal activation escapes feedback control” is stripped; no item carries a trailing dash clause.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 “serum calcium above 10.5 mg/dL”, “stage 4–5 (eGFR below 30 mL/min/1.73 m²)”, and “unless urinary calcium is monitored” are all retained; only the ER’s lay glosses are trimmed.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation in this section.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 The ER names six such populations and the section is correctly populated, not empty.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 All sixteen items map one-to-one to the ER bullets at lines 340–370.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 All sixteen ER interaction bullets are represented; none duplicates any of the six contraindications.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Sixteen <li> elements inside the caution_items span (lines 555–570).
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Every item is reduced to the agent or class name; the ER’s monitoring instructions and mechanisms (e.g., “Serum calcium is typically checked 4–8 weeks after…”) are all stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Every named example drug is retained (hydrochlorothiazide/chlorthalidone/indapamide, phenytoin/phenobarbital/carbamazepine, prednisone/dexamethasone, atorvastatin/simvastatin, orlistat/mineral oil/activated charcoal, cholestyramine/colesevelam, paricalcitol/alfacalcidol/doxercalciferol, MK-4/MK-7).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A The ER uses no ranking notation in this section.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 The ER names sixteen such interactions and the section is correctly populated, not empty.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A The section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 All three cells come from the ER Therapeutic Protocol bullets at lines 407, 409, and 417.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Maintenance dose, deficiency correction, and form are the three decision-bearing bullets; the remaining ER bullets are commentary on approach, timing, and modifiers.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies more than three actionable aspects; all three sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine spans carry ER-derived content, including the 50,000 IU weekly alternative and the D3-versus-D2 rationale.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Deficiency symptoms, non-skeletal endpoints, and blood-level plateau are exactly the three horizons in the ER’s “Time to effect” bullet (line 473).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered High-tier benefit (deficiency correction) → Medium/Low-tier trial endpoints → pharmacokinetic plateau.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies three distinct time-to-effect aspects.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 3–6 months / 3–5 years / 8–12 weeks with ER-sourced sub-lines (ER lines 168, 421, 473).
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information, so the row is retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Every entry is an ER Expected Benefits sub-heading.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present and populated at the ER’s own tier assignments (2 high, 3 medium, 4 low, 2 speculative).
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Headings only; all Magnitude: lines, hazard ratios, and confidence intervals are dropped.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses occur in any benefits span; the ER’s “⚠️ Conflicted” markers are also removed.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers carry items in the ER.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Every entry is an ER Potential Risks & Side Effects sub-heading.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four spans present and populated at the ER’s own tier assignments (2 per tier).
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Headings only; the 1.54/1.64 risk ratios, the 66.9% versus 47.9% falls figures, and all mechanisms are dropped.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheses occur in any risks span.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four tiers carry items in the ER.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 All rows come from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success table (lines 511–518).
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All eight ER biomarkers are present with their optimal ranges and “why” text verbatim: 25(OH)D, serum calcium, PTH, 24-hour urinary calcium, phosphate, RBC magnesium, eGFR, alkaline phosphatase.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Line 701 carries the 12-week retest, annual stable-dose, and twice-yearly conditions from ER line 507.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 All six items come from the ER’s “Qualitative markers worth tracking” list (lines 522–527).
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six are present: proximal muscle strength, diffuse bone/muscle aching, respiratory infections, energy and seasonal mood, balance confidence, and new hypercalcemia symptoms.

Issues 11/08/2026 12:17

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 11/08/2026 12:09

  1. 9.2 — Four ER interactions omitted: [caution_items] (QRS lines 554-567) lists 12 of the ER’s 16 interaction bullets; ketoconazole and other azole antifungals, statins, over-the-counter bile acid sequestrants, and ultraviolet exposure and tanning beds are absent.

Fixes 11/08/2026 12:09

  1. 9.2 — Missing ER interactions added: Added the four omitted ER interaction bullets to [caution_items] in ER order — “Ketoconazole and other azole antifungals”, “Statins (atorvastatin, simvastatin)”, “Over-the-counter bile acid sequestrants (cholestyramine, colesevelam)”, and “Ultraviolet exposure and tanning beds” — bringing the gate to all 16 ER interactions.