Audit: QRS - Whey Protein Concentrate for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 23/09/2026 02:09 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 94
Passed 87
Failed 0
N/A 7
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Checked every span against the ER (Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, Expected Benefits, Potential Risks, Key Interactions & Contraindications, Monitoring); all content traceable
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 ER hedges kept, e.g. “possible cancer trade-off”, “may favor moderate totals given the IGF-1 debate”
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening or softening found; contraindication thresholds and exceptions carried over intact
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Benefits, risks, contraindications and interactions each drawn from the matching ER section
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, citations, expert names, NCT IDs or brand names on the sheet
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions present

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Measured, evidence-weighted tone mirrors the ER Conclusion
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 Timing and dosing items are presented as ER facts, not instructions
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms (IGF-1, eGFR, WPC34) are ones the ER itself uses and that the sheet needs for decision gates or markers
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 At a Glance separates the favorable case (filling a protein gap alongside training) from the uncertain case (high midlife intake)
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 No lay route-of-administration or colloquial terms such as pill, shot or taken by mouth

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings, gate heads, tier labels and table headers match the template (lines 440, 477, 519, 539, 551, 574, 593, 597-599, 723)
3.2 All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All template data-qrs-var spans present (page_title, header, at_a_glance, action 1-3, time 1-3, benefit and risk tiers, stop/caution, marker 1-10, cadence, qualitative 1-5)
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Diff against template shows changes only inside variable spans, tier display toggles and metadata; website spans and markup unchanged

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” 🟢 No mapped ER section is empty; empty tiers (Benefits Medium, Risks High/Medium) are hidden per 12.5/13.5
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels (“Standard dose”, “Time of day”, “Age considerations”) and interaction labels match the ER bold labels verbatim
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Marker names match the ER biomarker table; the time-to-effect labels come from the ER “Time to effect” bullet
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji; ER tier emoji and ⚠️/⭕️ markers removed
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Each section is condensed to its key facts; interaction labels are kept verbatim as 4.2 requires

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is on line 2, directly after the doctype
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢  
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢  
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 duration value quoted because it contains a colon
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢  
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 26.9.22 matches the QRS.md version
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 2026-0923-0156
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢  
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Opus
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢  
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Opus 5.5
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢  
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢  

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Whey Protein Concentrate for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢  
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 09/23/2026
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5.5
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢  

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens with “a dietary supplement powder made from milk, is used to build and keep muscle”
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion: benefits, mild risks, and the trade-off verdict
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 67 words
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each fact maps to ER Conclusion, Motivation or Practical Considerations (regulatory status)
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All 5 ER “Populations who should avoid” items present (lines 542-546)
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Explanatory parentheses from the ER (e.g., galactosemia definition, isolate alternative) removed
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 CKD stage 3b-5 / eGFR <45 / not on dialysis, IgE-mediated with prior anaphylaxis and the PKU exception are all kept
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A ER uses no ranking notation
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 ER names avoidance populations; section populated
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section not empty

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 All 11 ER interaction bullets present; none repeat the contraindications
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Mechanisms removed; only effect and spacing/monitoring facts kept
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Example drug lists, category tags and time windows (30-60 min, 2 h / 4-6 h, 4 h levothyroxine, creatine 3-5 g/day) kept
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A ER uses no ranking notation
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 ER lists interactions; section populated
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section not empty

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Drawn from ER Therapeutic Protocol
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Standard dose, time of day and age considerations
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER lists more than three protocol aspects
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢  

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Muscle mass & strength, post-meal glucose, and blood pressure & triglycerides: the three aspects the ER “Time to effect” bullet names
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered to match the ER High-tier benefit order: muscle, glucose, triglycerides/BP
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER gives three time-to-effect aspects
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢  
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A ER provides time-to-effect information

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢  
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢  
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Items reduced to the ER benefit headings
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parenthetical content
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_medium hidden with display: none (line 524)

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢  
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢  
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Items reduced to the ER risk headings
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parenthetical content
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high and risks_medium hidden with display: none (lines 576, 579)

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢  
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 10 ER biomarker rows listed
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Cadence matches the ER Monitoring paragraph

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢  
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All 5 ER qualitative markers listed verbatim

Issues 23/09/2026 02:09

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 23/09/2026 02:08

  1. 4.5 — Sheet exceeds one A4 page: The 11 Key Interactions items (lines 554–564), the long Monitoring targets for IGF-1 and lean mass (lines 663, 707) and the long cadence sentence (line 717) push the rendered sheet to roughly 1.5–2 A4 pages instead of being condensed to the one-page budget.

Fixes 23/09/2026 02:08

  1. 4.5 — Condensed Key Interactions items: Trimmed wording in all 11 caution items (e.g., dropped “lower absorption;” / “reduced absorption;” / “redundant leucine load;”), keeping every bold ER label, example drug list and timing window.
  2. 4.5 — Shortened Monitoring targets and cadence: Shortened the IGF-1 and lean-mass/grip targets and the monitoring cadence sentence, keeping every value, interval and the “No established … target” wording.
  3. 4.5 — Shortened time-to-effect sub-line: Changed time_3_sub from “Triglyceride reductions seen with supplementation lasting 12 weeks or longer; …” to “Triglycerides fall with 12+ weeks of use; blood pressure falls slightly”.

Issues 23/09/2026 02:04

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained IgE acronym: The first Contraindications item (line 542) uses “IgE-mediated” without a plain-language explanation, although the ER explains it as the antibody behind immediate reactions.
  2. 11.4 — Redundant time-to-effect sub: time_3_sub (line 511) “Changes appear after 8–12 weeks of use” only repeats time_3_value “8–12 weeks” and adds no meaningful content from the ER.

Fixes 23/09/2026 02:04

  1. 2.7 — Unexplained IgE acronym: Changed “(especially IgE-mediated with prior anaphylaxis)” to “(especially immediate-type, IgE-mediated allergy with prior anaphylaxis)”, using the ER’s own explanation.
  2. 11.4 — Redundant time-to-effect sub: Replaced time_3_sub “Changes appear after 8–12 weeks of use” with “Triglyceride reductions seen with supplementation lasting 12 weeks or longer; blood pressure falls slightly”, drawn from the ER Expected Benefits and Conclusion.

Issues 23/09/2026 02:01

  1. 1.1 — IGF-1 target wording altered: Monitoring marker_6_target (QRS line 663) reads “track change from own baseline within the age-specific reference range”, dropping the ER’s “and keep within” (ER line 436), so the target is not literally supported by the ER.

Fixes 23/09/2026 02:01

  1. 1.1 — IGF-1 target wording restored: Changed marker_6_target from “track change from own baseline within the age-specific reference range” to the ER’s “track change from own baseline and keep within the age-specific reference range”.

Issues 23/09/2026 01:59

  1. 9.5 — Creatine dose qualifier dropped: The “Creatine and vitamin D” Key Interactions item (QRS line 561) omits the ER parenthetical “(creatine 3–5 g/day)” attached to “No safety concern at standard doses”, dropping a threshold qualifier entirely.

Fixes 23/09/2026 01:59

  1. 9.5 — Creatine dose qualifier restored: Appended “; no safety concern at standard doses (creatine 3–5 g/day)” to the “Creatine and vitamin D” Key Interactions item, restoring the ER parenthetical dose qualifier.