Audit: QRS - Whey Protein Isolate for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 10/31/2026 14:43 using AI4L / Opus 5.5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 97
Passed 86
Failed 0
N/A 11
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Lede, Protocol, Time to effect, gates, tiers and Monitoring all trace to ER text (Conclusion, Therapeutic Protocol, Practical Considerations, Key Interactions & Contraindications, Monitoring table)
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Lede keeps “modest”, “untested in people”; Time to effect keeps “Changes appeared mainly in trials of that length”
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No claim strengthened or softened
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Facts kept under their ER categories
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 No PMIDs, citations, expert names, NCT IDs or brand names

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢  
2.2 The tone of the QRS is expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢  
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses the reader directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms (CKD, IgE-mediated, DPP-4 inhibitors, marker names) are ER labels carried verbatim
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.11 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢  
2.13 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” wording
2.14 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 No pill / by mouth / shot / bad reaction wording

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and column headers unchanged
3.2 Every element carrying a data-qrs-var attribute in [qrs_template] is present in the QRS with the same name 🟢 All template variables present; # patterns expanded to marker_1..10 and qualitative_item_1..6
3.3 Everything outside the data-qrs-var spans — markup, text, styles, comments — is as in the template; spans that no checklist item addresses are left unchanged as well 🟢 Diff vs template shows changes only inside data-qrs-var spans, metadata values, and display:none on the empty risk tiers (13.5)

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 An empty ER section never produces visible empty-state text in the QRS: the corresponding region is hidden or left empty. Phrases such as “None documented in human trials to date” or “Not formally studied” appear only where the ER uses them for a fact the QRS carries over. 🟢 Empty ER risk tiers (High, Medium) hidden; no empty-state text
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Protocol labels, gate labels and marker names use the ER bold labels
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels trimmed only of glosses/examples, ER wording kept
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. It fails this item only for one of four things: a trailing clause after a dash, an optional gloss, an example list left untrimmed, or a repetition. Nothing else is cut to fit. 🟢 No trailing dash clauses, glosses dropped, example lists trimmed, no repetition

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Line 2
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Lines 3 and 13
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢  
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 duration quoted because it contains a colon
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 Line 4
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 26.10.25 matches QRS.md
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 2026-1031-1433
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is the full name without the version number, with all remaining words joined by hyphens (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini-Flash, GPT); when the full name has no version number or is “Unknown”, the nickname equals the full name 🟢  
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 Opus 5.5
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the model name (the word or words directly before the version number, leaving out the first if there is more than one, e.g., Claude Opus 5.5 → Opus 5.5), the model version number and the variant (if any) as stated in the system prompt or developer instructions of the creating model, with every word capitalized and without product, effort or pricing names (e.g., Opus X.Y, Sonnet X.Y, Grok X.Y, Gemini X.Y Flash, GPT X.Y), the model name alone when the system prompt or developer instructions name a model without a version number (e.g., Grok), or “Unknown” when neither the system prompt nor the developer instructions of the creating model name a model 🟢  
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 Matches the file name

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 21
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 Line 423
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 10/31/2026
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 Opus 5.5
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢  

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence 🟢 Opens “a purified milk-protein powder, a dietary supplement used to build muscle and steady blood sugar”
7.2 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢  
7.3 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words 🟢 68 words
7.4 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢  
7.5 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢  
7.6 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢  
7.7 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢  

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All four ER populations listed
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢  
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 IgE-mediated and the eGFR/CKD staging qualifier kept
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A No ranking notation in the ER
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. 🟢 Section populated
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section not empty

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢  
9.2 [caution_items] represent the ER’s documented interactions — the items under its “Documented interactions:” label — excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications and any entry phrased as no interaction found 🟢 All eight documented interactions listed; none is a contraindication or a no-interaction entry
9.3 [caution_theoretical_items] represent the ER’s theoretical interactions — the items under its “Theoretical interactions (inferred from mechanism, not studied in humans):” label 🟢 All four theoretical interactions listed
9.4 The ER placeholder “None identified” is never an item: it means that group is empty 🟢  
9.5 Individual [caution_items] and [caution_theoretical_items] are formatted as <li></li>. The template’s bold “Theoretical (inferred from mechanism)” sub-heading is the only marker of the second list’s status: no item carries “(theoretical)”, “inferred from” or a mechanism clause 🟢  
9.6 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢  
9.7 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 At least one example kept per class; “over-the-counter” and “(supplement)” qualifiers kept
9.8 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. N/A No ranking notation in the ER
9.9 If the ER’s theoretical group is empty, the whole Theoretical block — the caution_theoretical span with its sub-heading and list — is hidden with style="display:none", not removed: its spans stay in place, empty. N/A ER theoretical group is not empty
9.10 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. 🟢 Section populated
9.11 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on, and the Theoretical block is hidden per 9.9. E.g. N/A Section not empty

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Therapeutic Protocol section 🟢  
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from that section 🟢 Daily protein target, per-serving dose, premeal glucose approach
10.3 If fewer than three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER, the unused sets are left empty and hidden with style="display:none", not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER has more than three aspects
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from that section. 🟢  

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Glucose, lean mass & strength, lipids from Practical Considerations
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 High benefit first, then Medium
11.3 If fewer than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER, the unused sets are left empty and hidden with style="display:none", not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A ER gives three aspects
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢  
11.5 If the ER provides no information on time to effect at all, the whole Time to effect block (its subhead and all three sets) is hidden with style="display:none", not removed: its spans stay in place, empty. N/A ER gives time-to-effect information

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢  
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢  
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢  
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
12.5 If a tier (high, medium, low, speculative) has no items, its span is hidden with style="display:none", not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A Every benefit tier has items

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢  
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢  
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢  
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢  
13.5 If a tier (high, medium, low, speculative) has no items, its span is hidden with style="display:none", not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 risks_high and risks_medium hidden with display:none

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section 🟢  
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from that section are listed, one table row per marker; the template’s # row is the pattern, repeated with # replaced by 1, 2, 3 … in the data-qrs-var names 🟢 All ten ER biomarkers listed
14.3 [marker_#name] is the marker, [marker#target] its target value or range as given in the ER, [marker#_why] its purpose in a few words; a target the ER does not give is written “Not specified in the ER” 🟢 Targets match the ER table
14.4 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from that section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢  
14.5 If the ER names no measurable biomarker, the table is hidden with style="display:none" and the single # row is left as in the template N/A ER names biomarkers

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section 🟢  
15.2 All subjective/qualitative markers from that section are listed, one <li> per marker; the template’s # item is the pattern, repeated with # replaced by 1, 2, 3 … 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers listed
15.3 If the ER names no qualitative marker, the card’s list is hidden with style="display:none" and the single # item is left as in the template N/A ER names qualitative markers

Issues 10/31/2026 14:43

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.

Issues 10/31/2026 14:41

  1. 4.5 — Repeated “per serving” in Protocol: action_2_value at line 464 reads “About 0.40 g/kg per serving”, repeating the “per serving” already given by the label “Per-serving dose, older adults” at line 461.

Fixes 10/31/2026 14:41

  1. 4.5 — Repeated “per serving” removed: Changed action_2_value from “About 0.40 g/kg per serving” to “About 0.40 g/kg”; the label already says per-serving.

Issues 10/31/2026 14:37

  1. 4.5 — Repeated 12-week figure: In Time to effect (lines 514/517), time_3_sub “Changes appeared mainly in trials of 12 weeks or longer” repeats the “12 weeks or more” already shown in time_3_value.

Fixes 10/31/2026 14:37

  1. 4.5 — Repeated 12-week figure: Changed time_3_sub from “Changes appeared mainly in trials of 12 weeks or longer” to “Changes appeared mainly in trials of that length”. The hedge stays and the figure is no longer repeated.

Issues 10/31/2026 14:36

  1. 1.3 — Practitioner view stated unattributed: Protocol action_1_sub at line 456 reads “whole-food protein as the base, whey as a top-up”, while the ER’s “Alternative: food first” bullet attributes this to “Many practitioners”.
  2. 4.5 — Time-to-effect sub repeats value: time_1_sub at line 495 “Glucose lowering appears with the first dose” restates the label “Post-meal glucose” and value “First premeal dose”.

Fixes 10/31/2026 14:36

  1. 1.3 — Practitioner view stated unattributed: Changed action_1_sub from “whole-food protein as the base, whey as a top-up” to “many practitioners treat whole-food protein as the base, powders as a top-up”, restoring the ER’s attribution.
  2. 4.5 — Time-to-effect sub repeats value: Replaced time_1_sub “Glucose lowering appears with the first dose” with “Larger and longer-lasting in type 2 diabetes” from the ER’s Benefit-Modifying Factors.