Audit: QRS - Avoiding Carrageenan for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 20/09/2026 01:32 using AI4L / Opus 5

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 93
Passed 84
Failed 0
N/A 9
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 Spot-checked every populated span against the ER; all supported (e.g. action_1 vs ER Therapeutic Protocol “Standard elimination protocol”, marker rows vs the ER biomarker table).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 Cautious framing carried: “lean healthy adults showed no change” (at_a_glance), marker_8_target “No established target: track the direction of change…”.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening or softening detected; tier assignments match the ER exactly.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. 🟢 Benefits, risks, contraindications and interactions each map back to the matching ER section; no Benefit- or Risk-Modifying Factor is surfaced as a gate.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 Only brand names present are Carragelose and Coldamaris, both named in the ER for the same fact; no PMIDs, NCT IDs or author names appear.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions on the sheet; the ER’s “University of Illinois Chicago group” attribution was dropped rather than reworded.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Matches the ER’s measured, contested-evidence register.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢  
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢  
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢  
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢  
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person pronouns anywhere in the populated spans.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Technical terms are limited to biomarker names, which are unavoidable.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢  
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢  
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢  
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢  
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 at_a_glance states the benefit is confined to those already metabolically or intestinally affected, matching the ER.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. 🟢 No “anti-aging” phrasing anywhere.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. 🟢 No colloquial route-of-administration or consumer-grade substitutions; “blood sugar” phrasing in at_a_glance mirrors the ER Conclusion wording.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”; Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”; Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative”; Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” 🟢 All fixed headings, gate headings, tier labels and table column headers are byte-identical to the template.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. 🟢 All 34 template span names present; marker_#* and qualitative_item# expanded to marker_1-8 and qualitative_item_1-6.
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Diff against the template shows changes only inside data-qrs-var spans and the title; the website=”…” spans, CSS and footer are untouched.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” N/A No source ER section is empty. The ER Expected Benefits High tier carries explanatory prose rather than an empty-state phrase, and is handled under 12.5.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 caution_items reuse the ER bold labels verbatim (“Prescription liquid and diagnostic preparations”, “Supplements with additive effects”, etc.).
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Protocol labels match the ER bullet labels verbatim; time labels are drawn from the ER Practical Considerations “Time to effect” bullet.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. 🟢 No emoji characters in the file.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Every section is condensed relative to the ER (magnitudes, mechanisms, attributions and citations all stripped); the element counts that drive length are those mandated by 8.5, 9.5, 14.2 and 15.2.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Comment block occupies lines 2-14, immediately after <!doctype html>.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. 🟢 Opening “—” on line 3, closing “—” on line 13; the descriptive line before it is not parsed.
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. 🟢 Inside an HTML comment; no element repeats the values on the sheet.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 Only duration: "00:03" is quoted, which is required because the value contains a colon.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” 🟢 er_filename: avoiding_carrageenan_2026-0920-0004_Opus_ER.md
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.9.11, matching the QRS.md version badge.
5.7 Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0920-0126
5.8 The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus
5.9 The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) 🟢 Single word, no version.
5.10 The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 5
5.11 The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) 🟢 Nickname plus version number, no qualifier.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” 🟢 qrs_filename matches the file on disk.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. 🟢 No stray whitespace or unnecessary quoting.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Avoiding Carrageenan for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”, with & entity-encoded.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., &amp; for &) 🟢 “Avoiding Carrageenan for Health & Longevity”, matching the ER canonical_topic.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] 🟢 09/20/2026, matching qrs_creation_date 2026-0920.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] 🟢 “Opus 5”
6.5 No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. 🟢 Header is identical to the template; no AKA line, badge or audit stamp added.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion: who benefits, who does not, and what removal costs.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words 🟢 Exactly 60 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Each clause traces to a distinct Conclusion passage (non-absorption, subgroup benefit, no change in lean adults, the three named costs).
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead 🟢 No acronyms; “blood sugar handling”, “inflammation markers” and “bowel flares” replace the clinical terms.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) 🟢 No trial names, years, sample sizes or p-values.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results 🟢 No hazard ratios, confidence intervals or percentages.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Taken from the ER “Populations who should avoid Avoiding Carrageenan” list within Key Interactions & Contraindications.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER 🟢 All five ER populations are represented, one per item.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Five <li> elements inside the stop_items span.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 No mechanistic rationale, citations or post-dash trailing clauses; each item is the bare qualifying condition.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 Severity and threshold qualifiers preserved: “(International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Level 3-4)”, “above 5% in six months”, “below 20 kg/m2”, “(anorexia nervosa, avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder)”.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 The ER uses no ranking notation in this list, and none was carried through.
8.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. N/A Section is not empty: five populations are carried from the ER.
8.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section 🟢 Taken from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications bullet list.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications 🟢 Five of the seven ER interaction bullets appear; “Texture-modified diets” and “Other intervention interactions” are correctly omitted because both already appear as contraindications.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> 🟢 Five <li> elements inside the caution_items span.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. 🟢 Severity/consequence/mitigation prose from the ER bullets is stripped; only the label plus the named examples remain.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). 🟢 All ER example lists preserved in full (barium sulfate enema solutions and oral suspensions; Carragelose and Coldamaris; the four supplement categories; the five additive-effect supplements).
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. 🟢 The ER uses no ranking notation in these bullets.
9.7 The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. N/A Section is not empty: five interactions are carried from the ER.
9.8 If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. N/A Section is not empty.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Derived from the ER Therapeutic Protocol section.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section 🟢 Covers duration (12 weeks minimum), scope (carrageenan alone) and consistency (every meal) - the three aspects that determine how the exclusion is actually executed.
10.3 If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A The ER supplies more than three actionable aspects; all three action sets are used.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All nine action fields carry ER-derived content.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER 🟢 Glucose regulation, digestive symptoms and total cholesterol are the only three time-to-effect aspects the ER states.
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit 🟢 Ordered Medium (glucose regulation), Medium (digestive symptoms / ulcerative colitis relapse) then Low (total cholesterol), matching the ER benefit tiers.
11.3 If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. N/A Three distinct time-to-effect aspects are present; all three time sets are used.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All nine time fields carry ER-derived content; the sub-lines echo the ER “Time to effect” bullet.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel N/A The ER Practical Considerations section provides time-to-effect data, so the row is correctly retained.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section 🟢 Derived from the ER Expected Benefits section.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] 🟢 All four tier spans present.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each tier is a semicolon-separated list of bare benefit statements; no magnitudes, p-values or mechanisms.
12.4 Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parenthetical content carried over.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. 🟢 benefits_high carries style=”display: none” because the ER states no benefit reaches High; no empty-state phrasing was inserted.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section 🟢 Derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] 🟢 All four tier spans present.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. 🟢 Each tier is a bare risk statement; the ER magnitudes, hazard ratios and sponsorship notes are stripped.
13.4 Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parenthetical content carried over.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. N/A All four risk tiers carry items in the ER, so no span needs hiding.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success section.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All eight ER biomarkers listed with targets and rationale verbatim: faecal calprotectin, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, HbA1c, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, interleukin-6, total and LDL cholesterol, serum zonulin.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. 🟢 Populated with baseline, 12 weeks, every 6-12 months thereafter, plus the 4-week calprotectin repeat, matching the ER paragraph.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section 🟢 Derived from the ER Monitoring Protocol & Defining Success qualitative list.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed 🟢 All six ER qualitative markers listed in ER order.

Issues 20/09/2026 01:32

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.