Audit: QRS - Carnivore Diet for Health & Longevity

Audit conducted on 25/06/2026 00:58 using AI4L / Opus 4.8

Iterations

Summary

Items Count
Total 91
Passed 83
Failed 0
N/A 8
Pass Rate 100.00%
  • Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
  • Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
  • N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation

1. General Rules

# Description Result Comments
1.1 Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. 🟢 All content traces to the ER (Conclusion, Expected Benefits, Risks, Protocol, Monitoring, Key Interactions & Contraindications).
1.2 Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. 🟢 At-a-glance “rests on no controlled trials”, “evidence remains thin and unsettled” mirrors ER Conclusion.
1.3 The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). 🟢 No strengthening or softening detected.
1.4 The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. 🟢 Contraindications, interactions, benefits, and risks map to their corresponding ER sections.
1.5 PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. 🟢 QRS introduces no PMIDs, NCTs, expert names, or brands.
1.6 The QRS does not introduce new attributions. 🟢 No attributions added.

2. Focus, Tone & Audience

# Description Result Comments
2.1 The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. 🟢 Matches the ER’s objective, unsettled-evidence framing.
2.2 The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging 🟢 Maintained throughout.
2.3 The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor 🟢 Presents evidence, not prescriptions.
2.4 The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice 🟢 No directive medical advice; footer disclaimer present.
2.5 The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” 🟢 Information-presenting voice.
2.6 The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance 🟢 No second-person address.
2.7 The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon 🟢 Plain language used; technical terms glossed where present.
2.8 Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner 🟢 Compact cells and bullets throughout.
2.9 It DOES NOT address the reader directly 🟢 No direct address.
2.10 The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. 🟢 Framing matches risk-aware adult audience.
2.11 The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Consistent with content.
2.12 The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. 🟢 Not general-population framed.
2.13 Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. 🟢 Risk/benefit weighting consistent with ER.
2.14 The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging”. 🟢 “Longevity”/”healthspan” used; no “anti-aging”.
2.15 The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language. 🟢 Formal terminology used.

3. Template Integrity

# Description Result Comments
3.1 The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified (card/section headings, gate headings, tier labels, Monitoring column headers). 🟢 “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment”, “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions”, tier labels, and “Marker/Target/Why” all intact.
3.2 All “” from the [qrs_template] are present in the QRS. 🟢 All expected spans present (67 var spans incl. 9 marker rows).
3.3 Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged 🟢 Template internal-link spans (website=”…”) left untouched.

4. Formatting

# Description Result Comments
4.1 When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. N/A No source ER section is empty.
4.2 Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. 🟢 Benefit/risk tier labels and protocol labels match ER.
4.3 Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. 🟢 Labels consistent with ER.
4.4 The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). 🟢 No emoji indicators in QRS body.
4.5 The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section with more content than fits is condensed, not extended onto a second page. 🟢 Content condensed; single-page layout preserved.

5. Metadata

# Description Result Comments
5.1 The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. 🟢 Metadata comment is first element after doctype.
5.2 Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by an opening “—” and a closing “—”. 🟢 Delimited correctly (lines 3 and 13).
5.3 The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS. 🟢 Enclosed in HTML comment.
5.4 All frontmatter values are trimmed; no surrounding quotes unless required by YAML. 🟢 Only “duration” quoted (contains colon); others clean.
5.5 The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]”. 🟢 er_filename: carnivore_diet_2026-0625-0002_Opus_ER.md.
5.6 Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]”. 🟢 qrs_prompt_version: 26.5.18 matches QRS.md.
5.7 Creation date and time stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]”. 🟢 qrs_creation_date: 2026-0625-0055.
5.8 The nickname of the AI is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_nickname: Opus.
5.9 The nickname is a single-word model name without version. 🟢 “Opus”.
5.10 The full name of the AI is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname”. 🟢 qrs_creator_ai_fullname: Opus 4.8.
5.11 The full name consists of the nickname plus version number and no additional qualifier. 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
5.12 The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename”. 🟢 qrs_filename: carnivore_diet_2026-0625-0002_Opus_QRS.html.
5.13 All frontmatter values are trimmed; no surrounding quotes unless required by YAML. 🟢 Values clean and consistent.

6. Page Title & Header

# Description Result Comments
6.1 [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet”, HTML-entity-encoded as needed. 🟢 “Carnivore Diet for Health & Longevity - Quick Reference Sheet”.
6.2 [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic], HTML entities encoded as needed. 🟢 “Carnivore Diet for Health & Longevity”.
6.3 [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY]. 🟢 06/25/2026 from 2026-0625-0055.
6.4 [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]. 🟢 “Opus 4.8”.
6.5 No additional header content appears (no badge, version stamp, AKA line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or variant marker). 🟢 Header limited to title and standard subline.

7. At-A-Glance Section

# Description Result Comments
7.1 [at_a_glance] is a dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section. 🟢 Condenses the ER Conclusion.
7.2 [at_a_glance] is no longer than 60 words. 🟢 54 words.
7.3 Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. 🟢 Weight/glycemic/symptom relief, elimination effect, fiber loss, cholesterol rises, meat-cancer links, thin/unsettled all map to ER.
7.4 It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications requiring specialist knowledge. 🟢 Plain language; “blood-sugar control” used instead of HbA1c, etc.
7.5 It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values). 🟢 No trials cited.
7.6 It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results. 🟢 No statistics cited.

8. Contraindications

# Description Result Comments
8.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Derived from the “Populations who should avoid” bullet.
8.2 [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER. 🟢 CKD, familial hypercholesterolemia, eating-disorder history, pregnancy, prior DKA, gout, hereditary hemochromatosis — all 7 present.
8.3 Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
8.4 Items are as concise as possible; no trailing explanations or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise; no trailing clauses.
8.5 Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet are preserved, kept concise. 🟢 “(eGFR <60)” preserved.
8.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 No ranking notation present; items are plain.
8.7 If no [stop_items] are present the section is left empty. N/A Contraindications are present.

9. Key Interactions

# Description Result Comments
9.1 The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section. 🟢 Derived from the interaction bullets.
9.2 [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions, excluding any already listed as Contraindications. 🟢 Glucose-lowering meds, BP/diuretics, warfarin, antacids/NSAIDs, iron/vitamin A supplements, SGLT2 inhibitors; no overlap with contraindications.
9.3 Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li>. 🟢 Each item is an <li>.
9.4 Items are as concise as possible; no trailing explanations or content after a dash. 🟢 Concise; mechanistic detail stripped.
9.5 Parenthetical qualifiers (example drug lists, etc.) are preserved, kept concise. 🟢 Example drugs (glipizide, glibenclamide, ibuprofen, naproxen, canagliflozin, empagliflozin, dapagliflozin) preserved.
9.6 When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens, normalize to a plain comma-separated list. 🟢 No ranking notation; lists are plain.
9.7 If no [caution_items] are present the section is left empty. N/A Key Interactions are present.

10. Protocol

# Description Result Comments
10.1 The section is derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Derived from “Standard approach as used by leading proponents”.
10.2 The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 Foods (animal only), Intake (eat to satiety), Meal frequency (1–3/day).
10.3 If less than three distinct actionable aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and invisible. N/A Three distinct actionable aspects are present.
10.4 All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. 🟢 All three cells fully populated from the ER.

11. Time to Effect

# Description Result Comments
11.1 The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER. 🟢 Weight & appetite (1–2 weeks), Metabolic markers (weeks), Fat-adaptation (3–6 weeks).
11.2 The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit. 🟢 Weight loss and glycemic control are the High-tier benefits, ordered first.
11.3 If less than three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned, unused sets are left empty and invisible. N/A Three distinct aspects are present.
11.4 All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. 🟢 All three cells populated from ER “Time to effect”.
11.5 If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely. N/A The ER provides time-to-effect information.

12. Benefits

# Description Result Comments
12.1 The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section. 🟢 Tiers mirror the ER Expected Benefits.
12.2 Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative]. 🟢 All four populated.
12.3 Items are as concise as possible; no explanations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, or mechanisms. 🟢 Concise; magnitudes/mechanisms stripped.
12.4 Parenthetical content is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried over.
12.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective span is set to display=none. N/A All four benefit tiers have content in the ER.

13. Risks

# Description Result Comments
13.1 The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section. 🟢 Tiers mirror the ER Risks section.
13.2 Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative]. 🟢 All four populated.
13.3 Items are as concise as possible; no explanations, effect sizes, qualifiers, attributions, citations, or mechanisms. 🟢 Concise; magnitudes stripped.
13.4 Parenthetical content is stripped, NOT preserved. 🟢 No parentheticals carried over.
13.5 If no items of a specific sub-section are present the respective span is set to display=none. N/A All four risk tiers have content in the ER.

14. Monitoring

# Description Result Comments
14.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Derived from the ER lab-tests table.
14.2 All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All 9 biomarkers (LDL, ApoB, HbA1c, fasting glucose, eGFR/creatinine, uric acid, electrolytes, vitamin C, vitamin A/iron) listed with matching targets.
14.3 [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER. 🟢 “Baseline, 4–8 weeks, 3 months, then every 6–12 months…” matches ER.

15. Qualitative Assessment

# Description Result Comments
15.1 The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section. 🟢 Derived from the ER qualitative-markers list.
15.2 All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed. 🟢 All 6 qualitative markers listed verbatim.

Issues 25/06/2026 00:58

Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.