Audit: QRS - Pterostilbene for Health & Longevity
Audit conducted on 29/09/2026 04:18 using AI4L / Opus 5.5
Summary
| Items | Count |
|---|---|
| Total | 94 |
| Passed | 86 |
| Failed | 0 |
| N/A | 8 |
| Pass Rate | 100.00% |
- Total = Passed + Failed + N/A
- Pass Rate = Passed / (Passed + Failed) × 100
- N/A items are excluded from the pass rate calculation
1. General Rules
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.1 | Every claim, magnitude, label, recommendation, and statement in the QRS is literally supported by content in the source ER. | 🟢 | All lede, protocol, time-to-effect, tier, gate, marker and cadence content traces to ER text (e.g., ER lines 145, 320–324, 355, 374–396, 414–418) |
| 1.2 | Where the ER uses cautious phrasing (“not formally studied”, “None documented in human trials to date”, “theoretical concern”, “data are limited”), the QRS uses the same phrasing. | 🟢 | Cautious phrasing kept: “no study compares timing”, “(uncontrolled)”, “no harmful interaction identified” |
| 1.3 | The QRS never strengthens an ER claim (e.g., “not formally studied” → “not required”) or softens one (e.g., “do not use during pregnancy” → “use with caution during pregnancy”). | 🟢 | No claim strengthened or softened; contraindications mirror ER lines 297–302 |
| 1.4 | The QRS does not relabel an ER fact under a different decision category. A “Benefit-Modifying Factor” from ER section is not surfaced as a “Caution”; a “Risk-Modifying Factor” is not surfaced as a “Side Effect”; etc. | 🟢 | Items stay in their ER categories (interactions, contraindications, benefits, risks) |
| 1.5 | PubMed IDs, study citations, expert names, clinical trial identifiers (NCT*), and brand names appear in the QRS only if they appear in the source ER for the same fact. | 🟢 | No PMIDs, NCT numbers, expert or brand names added |
| 1.6 | The QRS does not introduce new attributions. | 🟢 | No new attributions |
2. Focus, Tone & Audience
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | The QRS follows the tone of the ER, which is determined by the ER’s own language, phrasing, and framing. | 🟢 | Measured, evidence-weighted tone matches ER |
| 2.2 | The tone of the QRS is simultaneously expert, accessible, objective, and data-driven, but also empowering and encouraging | 🟢 | |
| 2.3 | The QRS reads as a trusted, knowledgeable guide rather than a prescriptive doctor | 🟢 | |
| 2.4 | The QRS avoids language that implies medical or clinical advice | 🟢 | |
| 2.5 | The QRS “presents information” instead of “providing guidance”, “recommending”, or “advising” | 🟢 | |
| 2.6 | The QRS never addresses “the reader” directly — it presents evidence, not guidance | 🟢 | No direct address found |
| 2.7 | The QRS is written in plain language, avoiding unnecessary medical jargon | 🟢 | Technical labels (CYP2C9, UGT1A9) are ER bold labels kept verbatim per 4.2 |
| 2.8 | Information is presented in a concise and very compact manner | 🟢 | |
| 2.9 | It DOES NOT address the reader directly | 🟢 | |
| 2.10 | The target audience is health- and longevity-oriented adults who are risk-aware, proactive, and actively seeking to optimize health or apply the intervention under review. | 🟢 | |
| 2.11 | The target audience is willing to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes as well as follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. | 🟢 | |
| 2.12 | The document is NOT written for the general population, who are unwilling to employ lifestyle and behavioral changes or follow protocols that may be inconvenient, costly, or require effort. | 🟢 | |
| 2.13 | Framing, takeaways, and risk/benefit weighting throughout the document reflect this audience, including where an intervention’s signal for the average person differs from its signal for this audience. | 🟢 | |
| 2.14 | The document’s own voice frames usage in longevity terms, not “anti-aging” (e.g., “anti-aging clinics”, “anti-aging community”, “anti-aging medicine”). Proper names that contain “anti-aging” (e.g., “American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine”) are quoted verbatim. | 🟢 | “healthy aging” framing; no “anti-aging” |
| 2.15 | The document’s own voice uses formal clinical and scientific terminology, not colloquial or consumer-grade language (e.g., “oral medication” not “pill(s)”; “oral” / “administered orally” not “taken by mouth” / “given by mouth”; “injection” not “shot”; “adverse event” not “bad reaction”). This holds on EVERY surface, including the QRS lede — the stricter plain-language bar (see 2.7) does not license lay phrasing for route of administration. Direct quotes from sources are exempt. | 🟢 | No colloquial route or product terms |
3. Template Integrity
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3.1 | The following labels and headings on the QRS are fixed and not modified: • Card and section headings: “Protocol”, “Time to effect”, “Benefits”, “Risk & Side Effects”, “Monitoring”, “Qualitative Assessment” • Gate headings: “Contraindications”, “Key Interactions” • Tier labels: “High”, “Medium”, “Low”, “Speculative” • Table column headers in Monitoring: “Marker”, “Target”, “Why” |
🟢 | All fixed headings, tier labels and column headers present unmodified (lines 440, 477, 519, 539, 552, 576, 595, 599–601, 725) |
| 3.2 | All “…” from the [qrs_template] are present in the the QRS. | 🟢 | All template data-qrs-var spans present |
| 3.3 | Spans that are not addressed in a checklist item are left unchanged | 🟢 | Diff against template shows changes only inside variable spans |
4. Formatting
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4.1 | When the source ER section is empty, the QRS uses the ER’s own empty-state phrasing verbatim. Typical phrasings are “None documented in human trials to date” and “Not formally studied” | N/A | No QRS section is sourced from an empty ER section; empty High tiers governed by 12.5/13.5 |
| 4.2 | Where the ER presents a bulleted item as “Label: content”, the QRS uses the ER’s bold label verbatim as the cell or row label. | 🟢 | Protocol labels and interaction labels match ER bold labels (ER lines 282–293, 320–324) |
| 4.3 | Labels are not paraphrased, abbreviated, or invented. | 🟢 | |
| 4.4 | The QRS DOES NOT use emoji indicators (no 🟩, 🟥, 🟨, etc.). Color and emphasis are conveyed through CSS and bold labels. | 🟢 | No emoji in QRS |
| 4.5 | The QRS is designed to render on one A4 page. Any section that has more content in the ER than fits the per-section budget is condensed by the LLM, not extended onto a second page. | 🟢 | Content condensed per section (interactions reduced to label + severity, tiers to key facts) |
5. Metadata
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | The metadata is placed inside a single HTML comment that is the first element after “<!doctype html>” and before any other comment, head, or body content. | 🟢 | |
| 5.2 | Inside that HTML comment the YAML block is delimited by a line “—” opening and a line “—” closing. Text before the opening “—” is permitted but is not parsed as YAML. | 🟢 | |
| 5.3 | The metadata is not visible in any rendered view of the QRS and is not surfaced by any other element on the sheet. | 🟢 | |
| 5.4 | All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. | 🟢 | duration quoted because value contains a colon |
| 5.5 | The filename of the source ER is stated as “er_filename: [er_filename]” | 🟢 | |
| 5.6 | Version of the QRS.md file used to create the document is stated as “qrs_prompt_version: [Version of QRS.md]” | 🟢 | 26.9.28 matches QRS.md |
| 5.7 | Creation date and time of the document is stated as “qrs_creation_date: [YYYY-MMDD-HHMM]” (e.g., 2026-0501-1430) | 🟢 | 2026-0929-0354 |
| 5.8 | The nickname of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_nickname: [qrs_creator_ai_nickname]” | 🟢 | |
| 5.9 | The nickname of the AI is just a single word model name without version, etc. (e.g., Opus, Sonnet, Grok, Gemini, ChatGPT) | 🟢 | |
| 5.10 | The full name of the AI used to create the document is stated as “qrs_creator_ai_fullname: [qrs_creator_ai_fullname]” | 🟢 | |
| 5.11 | The full name of the AI consists of the [qrs_creator_ai_nickname] and the model version number and no additional qualifier (e.g., Opus 4.6, Sonnet 3.2, Grok 4.5, Gemini 3.1, ChatGPT 5.4) | 🟢 | |
| 5.12 | The filename of the document is stated as “qrs_filename: [filename of this document]” | 🟢 | |
| 5.13 | All frontmatter values are trimmed: no leading or trailing whitespace, no surrounding quotes unless the value contains a colon, bracket, or leading special character that requires YAML quoting. | 🟢 |
6. Page Title & Header
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | [page_title] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter followed by “ - Quick Reference Sheet” (e.g., “Intervention - Quick Reference Sheet”). The [canonical_topic] is HTML-entity-encoded as needed (e.g., & for &) |
🟢 | |
| 6.2 | [header_topic] is set to the [canonical_topic] of the ER frontmatter, with HTML entities encoded as needed (e.g., & for &) |
🟢 | |
| 6.3 | [header_subline_date] is set to [qrs_creation_date reformatted as MM/DD/YYYY] | 🟢 | 09/29/2026 |
| 6.4 | [header_subline_model] is set to [qrs_creator_ai_fullname] | 🟢 | Opus 5.5 |
| 6.5 | No additional header content appears: no badge, version stamp, AKA / alternate names line, source-AI attribution, audit date, or QRS variant marker. | 🟢 |
7. At-A-Glance Section
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 7.1 | [at_a_glance] opens by saying what the intervention is — its kind (e.g., dietary supplement, prescription medication, peptide, plant, procedure, practice) — and what it is used for, in plain language, before any verdict on the evidence | 🟢 | Opens “Pterostilbene is a dietary supplement … of interest for healthy aging” |
| 7.2 | [at_a_glance] is dense, execution-oriented summary of the ER Conclusion section |
🟢 | |
| 7.3 | [at_a_glance] is no longer than 70 words | 🟢 | 69 words |
| 7.4 | Every fact in [at_a_glance] is supported by a distinct passage in the ER. | 🟢 | |
| 7.5 | It DOES NOT use acronyms or technical classifications that require specialist knowledge, uses plain-language terms instead | 🟢 | |
| 7.6 | It DOES NOT cite specific trials (names, years, sample sizes, p-values) | 🟢 | |
| 7.7 | It DOES NOT cite effect sizes, relative risks, or statistical results | 🟢 |
8. Contraindications
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 8.1 | The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section |
🟢 | |
| 8.2 | [stop_items] represent the Contraindications from the ER | 🟢 | All six ER populations (ER lines 297–302) listed |
| 8.3 | Individual [stop_items] are formatted as <li></li> | 🟢 | |
| 8.4 | Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. | 🟢 | Rationale “(no safety data)” stripped |
| 8.5 | Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). | 🟢 | Thresholds kept (≥190 mg/dL, under 18 years, below 90/60 mmHg) |
| 8.6 | When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. | N/A | ER uses no ranking notation |
| 8.7 | The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no population, condition, or scenario for which the intervention should be avoided, deferred, or used only under specialist supervision. |
🟢 | ER names populations to avoid; section populated |
| 8.8 | If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [stop_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. | N/A | Section not empty |
9. Key Interactions
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9.1 | The section is derived from the ER Key Interactions & Contraindications section |
🟢 | |
| 9.2 | [caution_items] represent the Key Interactions from the ER, excluding any that are already listed as Contraindications | 🟢 | All 12 ER interactions listed |
| 9.3 | Individual [caution_items] are formatted as <li></li> | 🟢 | |
| 9.4 | Items are as concise as possible. No trailing explanations, no elaborations, no mechanistic rationale, no attributions, no citations, no study details. No content after an em-dash, en-dash, or hyphen-dash (e.g., “— dose reduction required”, “— reduced efficacy”) — these trailing clauses are stripped. Just the key fact. | 🟢 | |
| 9.5 | Parenthetical qualifiers from the ER bullet — example drug lists, time windows, severity classes, threshold values, clinical staging — ARE preserved as part of the item, kept as concise as possible (shortened or trimmed where needed to fit the one-page budget, but never dropped entirely). | 🟢 | Example drug lists preserved |
| 9.6 | When the ER uses ranking notation inside parens (e.g., “>” for severity ordering) that depends on an explanatory phrase to interpret, normalize the items to a plain comma-separated list rather than carrying through the bare symbol. | N/A | ER uses no ranking notation |
| 9.7 | The section is left empty ONLY IF the ER’s Key Interactions & Contraindications section identifies no interaction, additive effect, or exposure that changes how the intervention is used. |
🟢 | |
| 9.8 | If the section is left empty, an HTML comment inside the [caution_items] span records the ER basis for the absence, naming or quoting the ER text relied on. E.g. | N/A | Section not empty |
10. Protocol
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10.1 | The section is derived from the ER Protocol section |
🟢 | |
| 10.2 | The three sets of [action] items cover the three most important actionable implementation aspects from the ER Protocol section |
🟢 | Standard dose, NAD+ combination, time of day |
| 10.3 | If less that three distinct actionable implementation aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. | N/A | ER provides more than three aspects |
| 10.4 | All used [action_#label], [action#value], [action#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER Protocol section. |
🟢 |
11. Time to Effect
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11.1 | The three sets of [time] items cover the three most important time-to-effect aspects from the ER | 🟢 | Blood pressure, liver enzymes, menopause symptoms (ER line 355) |
| 11.2 | The sets are picked and ordered by the magnitude of the related benefit | 🟢 | Medium-tier benefit first, then Low-tier in ER order |
| 11.3 | If less that three distinct time-to-effect aspects are mentioned in the ER the unused sets are left empty and made invisible, not filled with placeholder text or empty-state phrasing. | N/A | ER provides at least three aspects |
| 11.4 | All used [time_#label], [time#value], [time#_sub] items are filled with meaningful content derived from the ER. | 🟢 | |
| 11.5 | If the ER does not provide any information on time to effect, the section is removed completely from the Protocol Panel |
N/A | ER provides time-to-effect information |
12. Benefits
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12.1 | The section is derived from the ER Expected Benefits section |
🟢 | |
| 12.2 | Key variables are [benefits_high], [benefits_medium], [benefits_low], [benefits_speculative] | 🟢 | |
| 12.3 | Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. | 🟢 | |
| 12.4 | Parenthetical content — including effect sizes, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. | 🟢 | |
| 12.5 | If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. | 🟢 | benefits_high hidden with display: none |
13. Risks
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13.1 | The section is derived from the ER Potential Risks & Side Effects section |
🟢 | |
| 13.2 | Key variables are [risks_high], [risks_medium], [risks_low], [risks_speculative] | 🟢 | |
| 13.3 | Items are as concise as possible. No explanations, no elaborations, no effect sizes, no qualifiers, no attributions, no citations, no study details, no mechanistic explanations, etc. Just the key fact. | 🟢 | |
| 13.4 | Parenthetical content — including frequencies, severity grades, sample notes, mechanistic hints, and example studies — is stripped, NOT preserved. | 🟢 | |
| 13.5 | If no items of a specific sub-section (high, medium, low, speculative) are present the respective is set to “display=none”, not filled with “None documented in human trials to date” or similar empty-state phrasing. | 🟢 | risks_high hidden with display: none |
14. Monitoring
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14.1 | The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section |
🟢 | |
| 14.2 | All measurable/quantifiable biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed |
🟢 | All 10 ER biomarkers listed |
| 14.3 | [monitoring_cadence] is populated with the monitoring cadence/frequency derived from the ER Monitoring section. It is not left with placeholder text or empty. |
🟢 |
15. Qualitative Assessment
| # | Description | Result | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15.1 | The section is derived from the ER Monitoring section |
🟢 | |
| 15.2 | All subjective/qualitative biomarkers from the Monitoring section are listed |
🟢 | All 6 ER qualitative markers listed |
Issues 29/09/2026 04:18
Pass rate 100.00%. No issues found.
Issues 29/09/2026 04:14
- 8.4 — Rationale kept in contraindications: The pregnancy/breastfeeding and under-18 contraindications (lines 542-543) retain the explanatory parenthetical “(no safety data)”, which is a rationale rather than a threshold or time-window qualifier and should be stripped.
Fixes 29/09/2026 04:14
- 8.4 — Rationale removed from contraindications: Removed the explanatory parenthetical “(no safety data)” from the pregnancy/breastfeeding and under-18 contraindication items.
Issues 29/09/2026 04:12
- 1.1 — Blood-pressure dose claim overgeneralized: Protocol action_1_sub (line 450) says “blood pressure lowered only at 250 mg/day”, dropping the ER’s qualifier “Pterostilbene alone” (ER line 320); the ER also reports 50 mg twice daily plus grape extract lowered systolic pressure (ER line 145).
Fixes 29/09/2026 04:12
- 1.1 — Blood-pressure dose claim qualified: Changed action_1_sub from “blood pressure lowered only at 250 mg/day” to “pterostilbene alone lowered blood pressure only at 250 mg/day”, matching the ER Therapeutic Protocol wording.
Issues 29/09/2026 04:09
- 7.5 — Unexplained technical compound name: The at_a_glance text (line 433) calls pterostilbene “a berry-derived relative of resveratrol” without explaining resveratrol, a chemical name a non-specialist would not know; the ER glosses it as “the red-wine compound”.
Fixes 29/09/2026 04:09
- 7.5 — Resveratrol explained in plain language: Changed “a berry-derived relative of resveratrol” to “a berry-derived relative of the red-wine compound resveratrol” (ER gloss), and tightened two phrases (“a modest blood-pressure drop”, “weaker liver-health hints”) to stay within the 70-word limit.
Issues 29/09/2026 04:05
- 1.1 — Cholesterol risk overgeneralized: At a Glance (QRS line 433) says “a rise in cholesterol”, while the ER Conclusion (ER line 418) specifies a rise in “bad” cholesterol and the ER notes HDL fell at 250 mg/day (ER line 234).
Fixes 29/09/2026 04:05
- 1.1 — Cholesterol risk wording aligned: Changed At a Glance from “a rise in cholesterol” to ‘a rise in “bad” cholesterol’ to match the ER Conclusion (still 70 words).
Issues 29/09/2026 04:03
- 2.15 — Colloquial cholesterol term in lede: The At-a-Glance (line 433) says “a rise in “bad” cholesterol”, consumer-grade phrasing in the document’s own voice; the ER’s own wording “rise in cholesterol” is plain and non-colloquial.
Fixes 29/09/2026 04:03
- 2.15 — Colloquial cholesterol term in lede: Replaced “a rise in “bad” cholesterol” with the ER wording “a rise in cholesterol” in the At-a-Glance.
Issues 29/09/2026 04:00
- 4.2 / 4.3 — Stilbene interaction label abbreviated: The Key Interactions item at line 563 reads “Resveratrol and other stilbene supplements”, dropping the gloss from the ER bold label “Resveratrol and other stilbene (resveratrol-family plant compound) supplements” and leaving “stilbene” unexplained.
Fixes 29/09/2026 04:00
- 4.2 / 4.3 — Stilbene interaction label restored: Changed the Key Interactions item from “Resveratrol and other stilbene supplements: Monitor” to the ER’s verbatim bold label “Resveratrol and other stilbene (resveratrol-family plant compound) supplements: Monitor”.
Issues 29/09/2026 03:57
- 1.3 — Risk signal hedge dropped: At a Glance (line 433) says “The most consistent risk is a rise in ‘bad’ cholesterol”, while the ER Conclusion (line 418) says “The most consistent risk signal”, strengthening the ER’s claim.
- 2.7 — Unexplained NRPT acronym: The Monitoring “Why” cell for whole-blood NAD+ (line 712) reads “NRPT response”; NRPT is not expanded anywhere on the sheet.
Fixes 29/09/2026 03:57
- 1.3 — Restored risk signal hedge: Changed At a Glance “The most consistent risk is a rise” to “The most consistent risk signal is a rise”, matching the ER Conclusion (70 words).
- 2.7 — Expanded NRPT acronym: Changed the whole-blood NAD+ “Why” cell from “NRPT response” to “Nicotinamide riboside + pterostilbene response”.